Nope. It’s funny how the border tensions escalated right at the same time the US state dept started their Cold War with China. With all the pressure from the US, why would China open a new front and escalate with India? China isn’t stupid.
Tibet has more in common with India than it does with China.
lol, I would suggest that you learn Chinese or Tibetan and get on Chinese social media, and see what Tibetans think of India and India's claims on them, people have reposted such claims by Indians on Chinese social media, and all I'll say is some Tibetans can be mean.
India was never a country before the British arrival. It’s the English language that unites India. That’s why the Indian constitution is written in English. Indians like to talk smack against Chinese and claim Chinese lands belong to India. Guess what, the community government is quite tame compare to the nationalist Chinese government in Taiwan. The nationalists actually claim more land currency occupied by India. These Indian second Hand imperialists need to stop their fantasies
Yes it is. This is evidenced by Chinese wolf warrior diplomacy, trying to bully Australia, bullying the Philippines, and many countries in South China Sea amongst other notable behaviour patterns.
And the Chinese second hand communists need to stop their fantasies. Nobody cares what the Chinese claims to Indian lands are.
Tibet does not have more in common with India. This is another ridiculous myth that Indian nationalists believe. Just because there are some religious links doesn’t draw Tibet closer to India.
Yes it’s funny all of those conflicts arose right at the same time the US started its Cold War. It’s almost as if the US used its influence to push many of Chinas neighbors into a hostile stance in a bid to contain China.
Enough critical thinking to get that if one country starts trying to bully others, they start responding in kind.
One after another, neighboring countries of India are forging closer ties with China, and distancing themselves from India.
Yes, LOL would have to be there, for someone posing as a serious onlooker to reproduce the usual complaint about India made by interested neighbours. Unlike the lands forcibly occupied by the central core of Chinese empires, both northern and southern components taken into account, what constituted India was not simply political integrity, that was achieved on three occasions before the British. Like Europe, India was constituted of numerous political units unified by cultural ties, that long preceded forcible conquest.
True, as far as the tribes go, and to trace their history and connections, someone would have to have the historical information and knowledge of what happened as the residents of the Brahmaputra Valley interacted with their immediate neighbours, as the kingdom of Manipur waxed and waned, and as both of these interacted with the Toungoo empire. That being absent, we find only the most glib and superficial newspaper-headline defences.
Brilliant logic.
We should push everyone into a vast concentration camp, and pride ourselves on our unity of purpose.
Don't ask us, on this forum.
