India Has Lost Air Superiority to Pakistan, No Jets Left to Fight

[fitpOsitive]

Lets go one by one for this Indian take over story. Rich in soil? Most of your country is Arid, agriculture output is as bad as it is in India, Connections - Connects to Iran and Afghanistan, less said the better, people.... South India has around 250+ million people their GDP is $1.3 trillion with smaller area. There is zero benefits to adding Pakistan into India ZERO. I would personally fight for you if ever there is an occupation plan by India for Pakistan.

Just don't join them, if you want to fight for me. Love your offer.

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

Do you think it matters? After establishing direct link to you, why do you think how boat came in or blah blah blah is important. You can close your eyes but the world don't go blind. Tell me why is there a Mumbai attack investigation going on in Pakistan and why arrest people over it? Western Pressure because they too were listening in on your shenanigans.

So, you have no logical answer for me, most probably Mumbai attack was also false flag by your beloved RAW, because you planned very well a false flag and we had lot of international pressure upon us

 

[Maarkhoor]

@Gregor Clegane

"Tum itna jo muskra rahey ho, Kiya ghum hai jiss ko chuppa rahey ho"

 

[Mufasa]

Using this logic, If IAF has no jets left to fight, PAF has no airbases left to even fly.

What Indian policymakers fail to realise is that Pakistan can procure weapons from China at low cost and in large quantities. India does not have that luxury.

Soviet Union no longer exists, and India cannot rely on foreign suppliers to sustain a prolonged conflict. India needs a military-industrial complex capable of matching the scale and production capacity of Russia or China.

That is the only way to build the industrial capacity required to fight a two-front war. I am not saying a two-front war is inevitable, but the military must prepare for that possibility regardless.

Without prioritising indigenous weapons, domestic production and self-reliance over excessive dependence on foreign imports, India risks being dangerously unprepared for such a conflict.

 

[r3alist]

Okay - now staying with the 4th largest airforce getting thrashed. Sure PAF will claim victory as has been discussed beforehand but here are some facts which I (as an Indian) believe where IAF came out on top:

1) Hit targets well beyond IB, cratering runways, destroying terrorist buildings - that is indisputable
2) Successfully deployed A2G weapons to do so from long range
3) Lost a few planes (3 perhaps 4) - shouldn't have happened but the other side has right to respond and some damage will occur
4) No loss of airforce pilots - that is undisputed
5) At the end, according to India's version Pakistan DGMO asked for ceasefire. Pakistan says it was mutual - it never claimed that India asked for ceasefire. As an India, this is telling for me as if Pakistan would be winning, it would at least claim that Indian side called for ceasefire but no, only India is claiming that.

In the battle of narratives (big picture), India increased the red-lines and IAF played a role in that. To me that is success. You might see it differently...

On the contrary, the defenders couldn't do any independently verifiable damage on ground, most likely lost 1 HVT (Bholari one) and could only damage a few planes (we've heard theories of "restraint" not to escalate.

You did nothing Pakistan can't do if they chose, hit a runway wowww



but Pakistan achieved something India could not do twice and inflicted losses twice on India

That proves unambiguously you have a quality and capability gap, quality of personnel and thinking


You didn't expect what Pakistan did twice, you deterred your dithering selves, the smaller nation so much poorer. Why not stick to the Maldives? That's your level of strategic thinking possibly,

You accepted a ceasefires proposed by whoever.

Why?

 

[Vikramaditya1]

lol google it says 1.4 million at LOC, don't live in your utopia and fantasy world

 

[Yasser76]

View attachment 218757

O love it when you post basic search results as it really shows you know jackshit about the military. Like you really are the most ignorant Indian on here, and that is some achievment.

Any one who knows anything about military deployments (not you obviously), will know that for every single soldier on the front you require 1 to replace him, another one in reserve and around another 4-5 in support/logistics etc

By posting this you made yourself look even more stupid, and i did not even think that was possible

 

[Vikramaditya1]

So, you have no logical answer for me, most probably Mumbai attack was also false flag by your beloved RAW, because you planned very well a false flag and we had lot of international pressure upon us

Then it must be the world's best false flag. Because Danish intelligence were the ones who beamed us conversations between handlers, Americans were the ones who arrested who planned this, the British were the ones who had listened in on it and also Danish intelligence helped us get Tahawwur Rana a Pakistani former military doctor now rotting in Indian prison on trial. All false flaag

 

[Yasser76]

Then it must be the world's best false flag. Because Danish intelligence were the ones who beamed us conversations between handlers, Americans were the ones who arrested who planned this, the British were the ones who had listened in on it and also Danish intelligence helped us get Tahawwur Rana a Pakistani former military doctor now rotting in Indian prison on trial. All false flaag

and what do we have?

 

[Vikramaditya1]

O love it when you post basic search results as it really shows you know jackshit about the military. Like you really are the most ignorant Indian on here, and that is some achievment.

Any one who knows anything about military deployments (not you obviously), will know that for every single soldier on the front you require 1 to replace him, another one in reserve and around another 4-5 in support/logistics etc

By posting this you made yourself look even more stupid, and i did not even think that was possible

"You're right" is the word you're looking for. Knight in shining armour should produce what your Google results say as requested lol!

Even if you count 4, 5 times replacement that still wouldn't make sense because who's then deployed at Chinese border? Myanmar??? Nepal, Bangladesh. What about the rest o the Pakistani border, different regiments along South, Central India, Territories and Islands?

Only certain military deployment experts like yourself believe there is 1.4 million personnel in Jammu and Kashmir.

 

[Yasser76]

"You're right" is the word you're looking for. Knight in shining armour should produce what your Google results say as requested lol!

Even if you count 4, 5 times replacement that still wouldn't make sense because who's then deployed at Chinese border? Myanmar??? Nepal, Bangladesh. What about the rest o the Pakistani border, different regiments along South, Central India, Territories and Islands?

Only certain military deployment experts like yourself believe there is 1.4 million personnel in Jammu and Kashmir.

You are counting frontline troops, if you include paramiltary and armed police, my guess is around 1 million, but you have already proven you know little about what it takes to sustain 1 front line soldier, your ignorance does not deserve anymore engagemnt, just like I stop talking to a small child after a while

 

[Master Chief]

Women and Children die in India too, even in Kashmir, one of the shelling killed a Kashmiri madrassa teacher and injured his students.

We don't have it in us to pull of an Invasion of Pakistan is true lol!

Kashmir is disputed territory. Nice try though!