India is incomplete without Pakistan: Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajapayee

B

Baibers_1260

Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2024
Messages
2,063
Reaction score
3,078
Reputation
1,581.6
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
An answer to those who say India has no imperialist ambitions:
To those who don't understand Hindi a detailed translation will be given,
Basically Atal Bihari Vajpayee said India's Independence is incomplete and he will reunite Pakistan back into India. and he mentions some provinces of Pakistan by name.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.




Extract :

Flaying Pakistan for its continued interference in Kashmir, he remarked, "The fact is that the war is not for Kashmir but for the Pakistani psyche; and until they cease to think that Pakistan is incomplete without Kashmir, this will not come to an end."

Here, while he referred to his talks with Sharief during the course of his stay in Lahore, Vajpayee recalled, "I told the Pakistani prime minister to realise what would come out of this in case we also started thinking that India is incomplete without Pakistan.
 
They are indeed a very basic folk, who cannot even conceal their underlying civilisational aspirations. Perhaps they feel the real world plays out like some movie scene, where grandiose verbosity leads to an inevitable victory for he who is most vocal and "performative" to the baying crowd.

The existence of the game itself is understandable.

Why shouldn't any large, populous, industrious nation have regional aspirations, as has been the case throughout human history?

However, the fact that they cannot play this game with nuance, subterfuge and subtlety, and instead resort to Bollywood soundbites to stir the brainless hordes, remains their biggest weakness. Pakistan must continue to exploit this and other weaknesses that they refuse to redress themselves.
 
Vkdindian1 said:
Present day India has no imperialist ambitions. Those who disagree with this, might search and find statements on social media contradicting this observation
Click to expand...
India's independence is incomplete ( Azaadi abhi Adhuri Hai). This is not a social media statement, but an official declaration by the Indian Prime Minister .
 
@Vkdindian1
Present day India has no imperialist ambitions. Those who disagree with this, might search and find statements on social media contradicting this observation



India wants the "return" of Sindh officially declared by the Indian Defence Minister Raj Nath Singh .This is not a "social media statement "

www.indiatoday.in

Borders can change, Sindh may return to India: Rajnath Singh’s big remark

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, while speaking at an event, said the Sindh region, now in Pakistan, may not be part of India today but it will always be civilisationally a part of India.
www.indiatoday.in www.indiatoday.in

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Baibers_1260 said:
India's independence is incomplete ( Azaadi abhi Adhuri Hai). This is not a social media statement, but an official declaration by the Indian Prime Minister .
Click to expand...

A poem = official. Esp. the guy who was backstabbed by Pakistani establishment (Kargil after his Lahor visit).

Selective amnesia ke shikar log... Worthless discussions
 
This will be the outcome for India

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Vkdindian1 said:
Those who fancy that India would attempt to integrate Pakistan back into it’s fold after Pakistan gets weak, lose sight of the fact that many others could have been already integrated, if military power was the only thing keeping Pakistan safe.
Click to expand...
Many others have been integrated:
Hyderabad ,Junagadh, Goa, Pondicherry, Daman, Diu, Dadra, Nagar Haveli, Sikkim, Kashmir, and Ladakh.
What's stopping the integration of Pakistan back into India other than military power ?
Vkdindian1 said:
This includes Bangladesh as well as Nepal. Wouldn’t India have attacked these two and integrated them already? Do they have any military power to resist Indian invasion? In fact 1971 was the best time for India to remain in Bangladesh for many reasons and then occupy that territory. It is pure and simple an absurd idea that is used by fringe elements on both the sides for flaring of sentiments. Same is being done by many posters here.
Click to expand...
Could you answer the question yourself why Bangladesh was not permanently occupied and annexed in 1971 but Sikkim suffered a different fate just a few years later ?
 
Only those born before Independence. I think people like Advani was born in today's Pakistan so of course they may have such dreams. New crop of leaders have zero interest in Pakistan. Like what do we get if we invade and occupy Pakistan? Pakistanis and their problems?? Yeah, no thank you.
 
Religious discussions are not allowed.

Need confirmation from forum moderators that this subject be discussed.
 
El Sidd said:
Religious discussions are not allowed.

Need confirmation from forum moderators that this subject be discussed.
Click to expand...
I think you posted in the wrong thread, There is no mention of religion in this thread .
 
Baibers_1260 said:
I think you posted in the wrong thread, There is no mention of religion in this thread .
Click to expand...

Nope. Correct thread.

Bharatvarsa is a religious concept hence would require discussing religion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top