India - Pakistan conflict analysis - aims, tactics, strategy, results

Another point to note......
Pakistan's attack in Chamb sector in 1965, the first of its kind, against 191 Brigade....

Op planning must have been later updated, PA planners must have taken into account that it would be difficult to repeat the same in 1971, therefore, grouped 17 Division with 23 Division in 1971...simple and logical.....

However, as already highlighted, 17 Division got sucked away due to operational requirements elsewhere, and 23 Division was required to conduct the attack all by itself (being a defensive, deployed division, with additional offensive task)...

....and then, as history is witness, Gen Eftikhar did not disappoint anyone.....despite all the above mentioned odds.
 
1775386338256.png

I hope that when we have traversed the adventures of (Indian) XI Corps and I Corps in 1965, and come to 1971, you will give us your own narrative of General Eftekhar's battle management. I know it by heart, but don't have the vocabulary to tell this marvellous story. Marvellous from the point of view of military history; not as an Indian (as an Indian, it is uncomfortable to think that another Eftekhar might be under grooming for battle against us some day - in the words of Krishna's baby sister, who flew out of Kansa's clutches as he sought to murder her, "Tomare bodhibe je, Gokul-e barichhe shay". Not a good feeling).
 
One of the aspects of Indo-Pakistani military encounters that I find most uncanny is the way in which the Pakistan Army or Pakistani irregulars were baulked again and again by the long arm of fate. Baramula in 47-48, the mid-battle replacement of General Malik in 65, General Eftekhar's accident in 71.....

Yeah, but i think fate intervened almost equally for both sides....
for Pakistan...Kutch agreement, Chawinda (25 Cavalry vs 1 Armored Brigade), Zafarwal (PA brigade minus against IA 14 Division), Lahore (22 Brigade / 10 Division counter attack from Ravi North towards south), Chengez Force 1971 in Shakergarh sector, actions of 24 Brigade and 8 IABG against Indian offensive in 1971, Fazilka / Sabuna 1971 against IA 67 IIB, 18 Division spoiling attack at Loganewala.... and later as we have already discussed, Pakistan's riposte to Brass Tacks (positioning of 1 and 2 Corps), Pakistan's counter to Op Trident, Parakaram...

two professional gentlemen

If two are professional and gentlemen both, then quality and constructive discussion is guaranteed.

Thanks, but that young man is streets ahead of me. I appreciate the equating, though; it's flattering, to say the least.

You do realise he's younger than my daughter? I hate to think of him facing our soldiers in a command position, in a few years' time.

Thirst for learning is one thing which i dont intend to quench.
 
1775386462167.png
Yeah, but i think fate intervened almost equally for both sides....
for Pakistan...Kutch agreement, Chawinda (25 Cavalry vs 1 Armored Brigade), Zafarwal (PA brigade minus against IA 14 Division), Lahore (22 Brigade / 10 Division counter attack from Ravi North towards south), Chengez Force 1971 in Shakergarh sector, actions of 24 Brigade and 8 IABG against Indian offensive in 1971, Fazilka / Sabuna 1971 against IA 67 IIB, 18 Division spoiling attack at Loganewala.... and later as we have already discussed, Pakistan's riposte to Brass Tacks (positioning of 1 and 2 Corps), Pakistan's counter to Op Trident, Parakaram...

Thought-provoking......

Chawinda, of course, is a classic, but it was cold feet on the part of (Indian) I Armoured Division Div. Commander, not any accident, and the sheer brass balls of 25 Cavalry, spreading itself across the path of a crack armoured division. The only parallel I can think of, other than HMS Glowworm, or the string bags attacking the Italian Fleet at Taranto, is the brazen attack by American (and Dutch) 'tin cans' in the Battle of the Coral Sea; the charge of the Light Brigade, but at sea.

Yeah, but i think fate intervened almost equally for both sides....
for Pakistan...Kutch agreement, Chawinda (25 Cavalry vs 1 Armored Brigade), Zafarwal (PA brigade minus against IA 14 Division), Lahore (22 Brigade / 10 Division counter attack from Ravi North towards south), Chengez Force 1971 in Shakergarh sector, actions of 24 Brigade and 8 IABG against Indian offensive in 1971, Fazilka / Sabuna 1971 against IA 67 IIB, 18 Division spoiling attack at Loganewala.... and later as we have already discussed, Pakistan's riposte to Brass Tacks (positioning of 1 and 2 Corps), Pakistan's counter to Op Trident, Parakaram...



If two are professional and gentlemen both, then quality and constructive discussion is guaranteed.



Thirst for learning is one thing which i dont intend to quench.

Do you not see the enormous value to the entire world if you were to engage in leading Saudi and Emirati troops into battle against the Houthis? Or perhaps a permanent UN peace-keeping assignment?:p:
 
Chawinda, of course, is a classic, but it was cold feet on the part of (Indian) I Armoured Division Div. Commander, not any accident, and the sheer brass balls of 25 Cavalry, spreading itself across the path of a crack armoured division
Fate....for both sides.....if GOC 1 Armored DIvision could have used proper recce at the front of his division, he would have come to know that he was faced by 25 Cavalry only and would have swept this regiment aside.......same holds good for CO 25 Cavalry, if he would have known that he was facing the whole armored division, he might have been a bit defensive in his approach......
but then fate...1 Armored Division gets challenged by a lone armored regiment....a squadron each for the lead three armor regiments of the 1 Armored Division......Sparrow remains passive, Col Nisar goes head on and comes on top.

Do you not see the enormous value to the entire world if you were to engage in leading Saudi and Emirati troops into battle against the Houthis? Or perhaps a permanent UN peace-keeping assignment?:p:
Yes, but since we are discussing fate.....so in this case as well, fate will intervene.
 
1775386494626.png

We have seen the prelude to the main engagements in 1965, almost the equivalent of a classical music quartet or a quintet to the entire symphonic orchestra of battles heard of elsewhere, even battles fought by the British Indian Army in Burma. Only 13 infantry battalions on the two sides combined, about 4 conventional divisions, 2 and a half armoured regiments, a Corps worth of artillery, sporadic interventions by the IAF. Nothing more than would constitute a skirmish in any campaign of the preceding WWII, or even the Korean War, with its massed infantry attacks combined skilfully with infiltration tactics to take apart far superior weaponry and a technology an order of magnitude higher.

But this was to change very shortly, as a second, and then a third Army Corps on the Indian side took on several divisions on the Pakistan side, and both sides fought like tigers to break the other side.

By the end of August, the Corps Commander Indian XV Corps evidently had had much to say to his Army Commander, the GOC-in-C Western Command, General Harbaksh Singh, and to his COAS, General Chaudhuri. Operation Grand Slam was the last straw; when 191 Brigade, weakened and demoralised by the preliminary engagements that deprived them of their CO, was shredded by General Malik's two Infantry Divisions, and two Armoured Regiments, and his artillery, even the reinforcing two brigades provided to support the nascent Indian 10th Division could not hold out against the onrushing enemy. Given a day's respite on the 2nd, they held out as long as they could on the 3rd and the 4th, until finally flesh and blood could take it no longer, and 41 Mountain Brigade regrouped behind their reserve brigade, 28 Brigade, and took position at Akhnur.

This was effectively the end of both Operation Gibraltar and Grand Slam, and left Indian XV Corps holding the Haji Pir Pass, but not the heights surrounding that feature, thus denying the Indian Army the use of the strategic Uri-Poonch Road; Indian 10 Division was left to hold out against the Pakistan Army 10 Brigade, 104 Brigade and
4 Azad Kashmir Brigade, and two Patton-equipped armoured regiments, and artillery. Attacks on 10 Division continued on the 6th, and it was clear that this pressure would continue, even increase.

The situation needed a sharp reaction.

Sir please, let's think positive.

Despite all the false bravado by fanboys on this forum, my biggest fear is a conflict breaking out between India and Pakistan. Both sides are armed to the teeth, possess some of the most deadliest weapons and have mastery of the arms they possess. That's a lot of bodies sir.

Believe me, there is nothing that I would like to see less than our jawans in danger in war.

Sir please, let's think positive.

Despite all the false bravado by fanboys on this forum, my biggest fear is a conflict breaking out between India and Pakistan. Both sides are armed to the teeth, possess some of the most deadliest weapons and have mastery of the arms they possess. That's a lot of bodies sir.

I'm so glad you're following this thread. It has been a re-education for me; I had no idea I had got so many things wrong.

What do we already know about the background to the 'sharp reaction'?

We know from inputs by Shuja Nawaz, and also from PanzerKiel, about the background to I Corps actions, but immediately, at this moment, it might help focus to look at XI Corps exclusively.

About XI Corps, we are reminded that I Armoured Div was very much part of XI Corps reserves, and Dhillon gave up command of I Armoured to I Corps with great reluctance. So we have General Dhillon executing his part of the operation short of the thunderbolt that he should have been able to hurl, and having to traverse clear country, with no defences to shield his troops, and these troops being almost exclusively PBI: 15 Infantry Div, 7th Infantry Div, and 4 Mtn Div. A quick flash forward: 15 Div zipped over its given line of attack, and not only reached the Ichhogil Canal, the given objective, but was recalled and then asked to advance a second time, in the teeth of a warned and aroused opposition. This, in spite of the visible war-weariness of the divisional commander, and his contribution to the legacy of the Pakistan Army - he donated his jeep to its war museum.

7 Div pushed forward rapidly to Hudiara, its objective; however, while its two brigades, 48 and 65, were to have leapfrogged each other, 48 to capture Hudiara and Nurpur, two points across each other on the Lahore road, and 65 to approach the position held by 48 and move on past it to the Ichhogil Canal, in reality, while 48 Brigade achieved its objectives, 65 faced the aroused Pakistan Army and made heavy weather of its advance. Their story effectively ended when 48 Brigade was diverted to support 4 Mtn Div. which was in trouble to the south of 7 Div's axis.

4 Mtn Div proved all over again that mountain troops really have no business fighting in the plains; why these troops were repeatedly deployed during this phase and immediately earlier is a mystery (we just saw 41 Brigade come up to support the badly battered 191 Brigade at Chhamb, and their rough handling by the two Pakistani armoured regiments supporting Grand Slam). On top of everything else, this division and its components had to travel very long distances, hundreds of kilometres, to reach its assembly point. It is best to deal with the actions of 4 Mtn Div. separately, as it saw the most action, even keeping in mind the magnificent performance of individual battalions within the 15 Infantry Division.

XI Corps, under Lt. General J. S. Dhillon, was asked to strike straight for the Pakistani defensive line at the Ichhogil Canal. The topography between Amritsar and Lahore is flat and unrelieved by any kind of cover; that leads to advantages and disadvantages both. The advantage was that armour could move quickly, stopped only by canals and waterways, including rivers; the disadvantages were that artillery and air attack both could stop an attacking team in its tracks. For that matter, it could also expose a defending team to a pounding.

XI Corps also had the element of surprise. Pakistan had not done anything particularly effective to defend Lahore. Even its 10 Division had been positioned in front of the city only the day before; actually, only hours before the Indian attack.

XI Corps then had, north to south, 15 Infantry Div., aiming for Dograi; 7 Infantry Div., aiming for Hudiara, and 4 Mtn. Brigade was launched at Kasur.

The initial objective was to advance along the GT Road to the east bank of the Ichhogil Canal, just next to the village of Dograi, which lay east of the Canal. To do this, General Dhillon had assigned 15 Infantry Division, that had two Brigades under command: 38 Brigade, tasked to take the road bridge at Bhaini Dhilwan, leading to the Pakistani enclave; and 54 Brigade, launched straight down the GT Road (the northernmost bridge near Dera Baba Nanak was assigned to 29 Brigade).

Let us see what happened at each of these bridges.

BRIDGE OVER RAVI NEAR DERA BABA NANAK

First, northernmost bridge near Dera Baba Nanak, and 29 Infantry Brigade; Brig. Pritam Singh, had captured this bridge and its enclave early on 6th September. Dera Baba Nanak was 80 kms southerly of Jammu, where all the excitement had been on the 1st, 3rd, 4th and 6th of September.

If I have read the maps correctly, this is the same bridge that connects Dera Baba Nanak to Kartarpur, over the Ravi, and allowing Pakistan access to its land enclave east of the Ravi; a bridge that has been much in the news recently.

However, the Pakistan Army, realising the situation in all its gravity with the three divisions attacking and gaining quick objectives on the 6th itself, reacted very strongly, and recovered much of the losses; this bridge was one of the first to be recovered. Around 15:00 HRS on the 6th, the Army Commander and the Corps Commander heard from Pritam Singh that the situation was dire, and that 29 Brigade should be allowed to fall back on the Batala Road, further behind his current position off the objective, of which he had been dispossessed.

There was logic behind this, although Pritam Singh had gone into a flap earlier than necessary. The thinking behind the bid to capture this bridge had been to pre-empt a Pakistani crossing in strength and a drive towards Gurdaspur and then towards Pathankot; Pathankot, it needs to be remembered, was 108 kms from Dera Baba Nanak, Gurdaspur only 70. They lay in the easterly direction from DBN; therefore withdrawing to the Batala Road, somewhat south-east of DBN, would allow Pritam to threaten the right flank of such an attack if it developed, and cut the lines of communication by attacking the connecting bridge.

However, Pritam Singh had not checked the situation on the ground, and was reacting to the tales of woe received from his forward battalions. While capturing the bridge in the early hours of the 6th, in darkness, the Indian troops had not noticed that a watchtower remained intact, and that the Pakistan Army were using it as an Artillery Observation Post, and calling down heavy fire from first light itself on the troops occupying the bridge. After softening them up for eight hours, the Pakistan Army advanced with tanks and overran two companies of the forward Indian battalion; the rest of the battalion managed to hang on. The shelling continued, and most of 29 Brigade got a fair share of attention.

This was the position at 14:00 HRS and this is what was partially reported to General Harbaksh Singh and General Dhillon at 15:00. On realising what had happened (or not happened, in this case), Dhillon ordered the 29 Brigade to stand firm, and put his GSO1 on site, to sit on Pritam Singh's head and generally encourage and edify him. For whatever reason, perhaps due to a refreshing and encouraging conversation with his Corps Commander, 29 Brigade first held out against a renewed Pakistani attack in the darkness of the 6th night, around 21:00 HRS, and then counter-attacked with armour at around 02:45 HRS on the 7th morning, winning back the bridge, and winkling out the mischief-making observation post. The PA, however, demolished one span of the bridge; in other words, the Indian defensive objective was achieved, the feared offensive move of the PA was still-born.

BRIDGE OVER ICHHOGIL CANAL AT BHAINI DHILWAN

The reader will have to bear with the narrative, as formation replaced formation in quick succession during the course of pursuing this objective.

Of the two brigades assigned to 15 Infantry Division, 38 Brigade was set to capture the Bhaini Dhilwan Bridge, and it fell to 1 Jat to achieve that. They did that, but could hold on, due to heavy artillery and tank fire. Later, on their falling back around noon on the 6th, the Corps commander personally ordered 6 Kumaon of the reserve 96 Brigade to take up the task and re-capture the bridge. They were unsuccessful in their attack on the 7th September evening, but consolidated nearby, holding on until the 8th September evening.

On the 11th, however, opposing tanks and infantry that had followed 6 Kumaon and 1 Jat when they left their firm defensive positions near Ranian, began to pose a major threat. To support them, 2 Independent Armoured Brigade, held by the Corps, that had just fought a brilliant battle in the Kasur sector, was shifted from 4 Mtn. Division to 15 Infantry Division, and reinforced 96 Brigade, whose unit 6 Kumaon was. Relieved of pressure from the opposing armour, 96 Brigade now took back the bridge in three days' time, by the 14th September.

96 Brigade had been the corps reserve for XI Corps. As it had been committed, 50 Independent (Para) Brigade that had arrived on the field, was attached to XI Corps, but was relieved in two days time by our old friends, 41 Mtn. Brigade, last seen fighting for its life in front of 28 Brigade in Akhnoor, and forced to pass through that brigade to re-group and consolidate. That regrouped and consolidated formation now was transferred from XV Corps to XI Corps, and took up position as Corps reserve; 50 Independent (Para) Brigade moved to a point north of Atari.
____________________________________oxoxoxoxo_________________________________________

These, then, were the two smaller engagements that 15 Infantry Division had, involving 29 Brigade in the north, 38 Brigade, later 96 Brigade.

The larger one was the battle for the Bridge over the Ichhogil near Dograi, fought by 54 Brigade, 3 Jat in particular, and the recoil and renewed attack on Dograi after the recall of the victorious troops by the Brigade Commander of 54 Brigade. This story might be named Victory into Defeat.

This will be narrated as THE BRIDGE AT DOGRAI.

Besides this, 7 Infantry Division struck out for its own objectives, and was not really successful.

To be reported as THE BRIDGE AT BARKI.

The really significant fighting under XI Corps, however, was the fighting under 4 Mtn. Div. in the extreme southern edge of the Corps boundary. That might echo Field Marshal Bill Slim's book, and be described as Defeat into Victory.



Just to remind all readers of an earlier post in the thread by @Panzerkiel, here it is:

Coming to Operations Riddle and Nepal....

XI Corps attack plan was named RIDDLE.....
involved attack towards Lahore along three axis (15, 7 and 4 Mountain Divisions), they were to capture area uptill BRBLC, with a be-prepared mission to go across it in case of unexpected success...moreover, Jassar enclave was to be eliminated and its bridge capture to negate a Pakistani offensive option towards DBN.

1 Corps attack plan was named Nepal..
for which a bridgehead was planned in Bhagowal-Phillaurah area to provide a firm base for 1 Armored Division to break out towards MRLC and Daska....

Problems faced by IA...
first, owing to vast distances (international border to peacetime locations), WC was forced to stagger all these attacks...therefore all these formations had to attack right from their line of march without any rest or necessary coordination...
WC also did not have upto date maps of their area of operations....

Moreover, there was also indicators of indian reluctance to cross the international border....some reasons being...
PA's edge in armor (quantity and quality)
Superior PA artillery
F-104 (even though it was available in a limited quantity to have any major impact on the tactical battle)

GOC XV Corps, since he was hard pressed due to Gibralter and Grandslam, pressed COAS to open the international border so that PA pressure against him can be reduced. Therefore IA D Day was advanced to 6 Sep in order to relieve pressure against Akhnur..

PRELIMINARIES TO THE BATTLE FOR THE BRIDGE AT DOGRAI

If we look at how the conflict unfolded, there is a steady development of the theme visible up to a point. So we had irregulars in action in Operation Gibraltar, messing up the peace of mind of the Indian XV Corps, and getting Katoch to imitate Stephen Leacock's hero: "Lord Ronald said nothing; he flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse and rode madly off in all directions." Katoch managed to keep the upper hand, and even capture an important strategic feature, but not without suffering injuries; not crippling injuries, but in the context of things, given that 47-48 was 17 years before, most alarming. He successfully communicated his troubled state of mind to his Army commander, and to his Chief, during his conference with them at Srinagar, and it was actually while they were with him that news of Grand Slam broke upon them like a, well, thunderclap. General Chaudhuri immediately air dashed to Delhi (I've always wanted to use that phrase!), got permission for taking action with a free hand and issued orders for the Indian riposte; Operations Riddle and Nepal (for some reason, these names are never mentioned in Indian circles in Indian annals).

So we saw a progression; from an entire Army Corps facing a large number of irregulars (estimates differ), albeit with considerable 'sympathetic' support from heavy artillery across the line of control, fire that had its own effect in battering the Indian troops defending Chhamb-Akhnoor, we next had, in Operation Grand Slam, 7 battalions and 2 Armoured Regiments, and the artillery from a Corps, on the Pakistan side of the equation, facing 5 battalions, a light tank regiment and fairly innocuous artillery. The inevitable consequences followed; the Indian position of the newly-institutied 10 Division was opened up as if by a tin-cutter, with one segment doing a backward left wheel from a north-south orientation to a west-east orientation along the foothills, and another segment falling back before a traumatic armoured attack faced by a mountain brigade, 41 Mtn Brigade, to re-group behind the Corps reserve, 28 Brigade.

The Div. commander lost his job; very unfairly, considering that he only got a division that took up its war-time location on the very day that his enemy attacked, and considering that he was left with ad hoc formations deputed to him at the eleventh hour, including a Mountain Division that didn't have the tools to resist an armoured attack, and an armoured contingent that was frankly not fit to oppose main battle tanks in battle. But there it is; he and the CO, 15 Infantry Division, were the two divisional commanders to be removed.

Both were negligent in reporting, and tried to mislead their respective commanders, Chopra the Corps commander XV Corps General Katoch, and Niranjan Prasad, who had already two strikes against him (NEFA 4 Division, Kashmir 25 Division) the Corps commander XI Corps Joginder Dhillon.

That was the critical difference.

One last point: it was baffling to see XI Corps attacking on such a broad front. From Dera Baba Nanak to Kasur is 125 kms; we have XI Corps deploying 3 Divisions, 15 Infantry, 7 Infantry and 4 Mountain, with two brigades, 38 and 54, under the first, two brigades, 48 and 65, under the second, and 7 Mountain and 62 Mountain, under the third. In addition, 96 Brigade was pressed into service vice 29 Brigade, in the tussle over the bridge near Dera Baba Nanak.

General Harbaksh Singh has an explanation, and we will go into that later. It was not a terribly convincing explanation, having to do with this being originally a plan that would have deployed 1 Armoured Division along one of the captured bridges, and looking a bit pointless after the COAS had diverted 1 Armoured Division to his pet new 1 Armoured Corps, and made a joke of the entire plan. That does not explain why, having found that this was going through, the XI Corps plan had not been changed to strengthen one of the four access points to Pakistani territory.

@Cuirassier

I don't know. I only have this brutally direct piece of narration by Harbaksh Singh:

In the meanwhile, a message came from 39 Medium Battery of Artillery (this was part of a Sikh Battalion converted into a Medium Artillery Regiment and the message was meant for me as Colonel of the Sikh Regiment) that the personnel of the 161 Artillery Regiment, deployed next to them, had deserted enmass, leaving their guns, with stacked ammunition, and wagon-line (vehicles) behind.They wanted them collected, lest they fall into enemy hands. Despite the desertion, they averred that the Medium Battery, in position, would continue to support the forward Brigade. Upon receipt of this message, I ordered the Divisional Commander, Major General Chopra, in the presence of his Corps Commander, to muster as much manpower and as many electrical mechanical engineers from his Division, as he could, and arrange to collect the guns, the ammunition and the vehicles. Having done so, he could then order 41 Mountain Brigade to withdraw that night. The orders for withdrawal were to get to the Brigade by 2 o’clock that afternoon, so that the Brigade Commander could plan his withdrawal properly. Thereafter, General Kashmir Katoch arid I left Akhnoor, by the same helicopter in which we had come, and flew back to our respective Headquarters.

The next morning, the 5th of September, my Chief of Staff was rung up by General Officer Commanding 10 Division to say that the Brigade had come back safely, with all its equipment and ammunition. But before congratulating the General Officer Commanding for this successful operation, I asked my Chief of Staff to check up from the General Officer Commanding if the guns had also been brought back. His reply that they could not be brought back made me furious. I ordered his Corps Commander to hold a Court of Inquiry for this lapse. As a result of this inquiry, General Chopra was sacked from his appointment.


After finishing the narration of the battle for the bridge at Dograi, and for the bridge at Barki (by 7 Div in the second case), when we come to the actions of 4 Mtn Div. I plan to share some relevant extracts from several different accounts. I do not have the book written by Major General Joginder Singh*, who seems to have been a thorough-going pain in the, erm, elbow, which is a pity.

Please bear with me till then.

* There were two general officers named Joginder Singh.
One was Major General Joginder Singh, Chief of Staff to Lieutenant General Harbaksh Singh; the other was Lieutenant General Joginder Singh Dhillon, GOC-in-C XI Corps.
 
1775386960584.png
THE BRIDGE AT DOGRAI: 15 DIV.

In keeping with the broad vision of capturing all 4 bridges across water obstacles that the PA had planned to use to defend itself and its territory minus what lay on the Indian side, the Indian 15 Infantry Div had been set the objective of reaching the bridge at Dograi, only a few kms from Lahore, and within shelling distance of the Lahore International Airport. The division had the 38 and 54 Brigades, and we have seen that 38 Brigade was busy with the bridge at Bhaini Dhilwan (that was ultimately captured on 14th September). That left Brigadier Rikh and his three battalions to deal with the bridge at Dograi.

The plan was simple.

3 Jat would take up position at the villages of Gosal and Dial, just 4 kms from the border at Wagah, and establish a firm base at Milestone 14 on the Lahore Road. 15 Dogra would leapfrog that position and attack the actual bridge another 3.5 kms on. Simultaneously 13 Punjab would make a right hook and capture another bridge that lay a little further south on the Dograi (or Dograe Kalan, as Google Maps prefers to call it) and Jallo.

With this, four out of five bridges that might be used for a break-out by the Pakistan Army would have been bottled up.

Plans last, according to military officers, until the moment of contact with the enemy. Quite in keeping with this aphorism, nothing went according to plan for this plan. It started off very well, with 3 Jat achieving its objectives and settling down to its well-earned rest and vantage point for the rest of the struggle. 15 Dogra faced problems from its kick-off point itself, and had to use 14 Horse to see off their unwanted company. By the time they reached the 3 Jat, they claimed they had suffered too many casualties to go on and take their objective, the bridge. 13 Punjab also got into a corner at Jallo Railway Station, on their way to their objective, suffered heavy casualties, and were stopped in their tracks.

[I am sorry to report that another set of notes taking this forward, through the delegation of the operation to capture the east bank of the Ichhogil Canal to 3 Jat, their crossing of the Canal, their inability to hold the position due to lack of support and finally an order to withdraw, and their return to the same object and capture of the east bank of the canal around the 22nd has been lost; it is not clear how.

While I will obviously re-write it, readers may please forgive the repetitive inclusion of new passages, and saving this note incrementally; as each section gets written, it will be placed on the body of this note, and saved.
]

THE BRIDGE AT DOGRAI – DELEGATION TO 3 JAT AND THE ATTACK ON THE EAST BANK

With the failure of the designated units to take up their assignments, Brigadier Rikh came up to Milestone 14 to confer with Lt. Col. Desmond Hayde, CO of 3 Jat. He asked 3 Jat if they would take up the task of 15 Dogra, to attack the east bank of the Icchogil Canal. Hayde agreed. By then a squadron of 14 Horse had arrived at Milestone 14, so they were roped in; it was agreed that one troop would go along with the Jats, and the other would follow after the settlement of Dograi had been cleared. With all this cleared and agreed all around, 3 Jat moved into action around 09:00 HRS on the 6th. They walked straight into an air attack, and lost men; in addition, they lost their recoilless rifles as well, and were left helpless against armour. This was to have critical consequences later.

As the leading company of 3 Jat collected themselves after the air attack, and moved forward on the GT Road, at this point running east-west, they came under heavy fire. Hayde then ordered the party to swing to the north and circle around the settlement. At the outset of this looping advance, they faced artillery fire while they were on the open field, got through it, and then attacked the fortifications on the east bank of the Canal.

The attack was successful. 3 Jat managed to clear the defences that they attacked on the east bank, and forced the troops stationed there to retreat to the west bank.

THE BRIDGE AT DOGRAI – BATAPORE AND ATTOKE AWAN

On inspecting the scene, Hayde realised that the bridge had been demolished by the defenders, but had fallen down neatly along its foundations, meaning that it could still be crossed as it had fallen. He led two companies across in the teeth of defending fire, and stationed them to north and south of the GT Road beyond the canal, in Attoke Awan and in Batapore respectively.

This was the furthest that Indian troops penetrated in 1965.

Unfortunately, the situation was not stable, and both companies had to retreat in about four hours, only for the battalion to be flung into battle just two weeks later, to engage with the Pakistan Army in the very hard-fought Battle of Dograi.

THE BRIDGE AT DOGRAI – FOR WANT OF A NAIL

Having got to the west bank of the Ichhogil Canal, the two companies of 3 Jat found themselves totally abandoned by their brigade. The company in Attoke Awan was driven back across the canal by heavy shelling from Sherman tanks. At this point, a troop of 14 Horse arrived on the east bank (it had been planned that one troop would accompany the original attack on the east bank, and the other would follow once Dograi had been pacified, but thanks to Hayde’s northward loop around Dograi, neither troop kept up – this was the earlier troop that had proceeded cautiously a quiescent Dograi and reached the bridge). Their covering fire encouraged Hayde to cross once again, and to reoccupy positions on the north side, just as before.

He was unable to communicate with his brigade HQ, as the equipment for man-packing their radio set had failed to arrive in the morning, so he sent three messengers to the 14th Horse to message brigade HQ and ask for anti-tank equipment; finally, since he got no replies, he sent off one of his officers. There was still no response, and the situation was bad for the Attoke Awan company in its exposed position and under enemy fire. Finally, he was forced to lead this company back, crossing the canal a 4th time.

On reaching the east bank, he got a shock. Lt. Brijendra Singh informed him that he had been asked to fall back, and to bring the infantry back also.

Hayde withdrew the company that had been holding its position in Batapore and fell back as ordered. It would take several hundred lives in a bloody battle two weeks later to get back to the east bank, and the only reason for this was the indecision of Brig. Rikh, and the panicky state of mind of the divisional commander, Major General Niranjan Prasad.
 
One last point: it was baffling to see XI Corps attacking on such a broad front. From Dera Baba Nanak to Kasur is 125 kms; we have XI Corps deploying 3 Divisions, 15 Infantry, 7 Infantry and 4 Mountain, with two brigades, 38 and 54, under the first, two brigades, 48 and 65, under the second, and 7 Mountain and 62 Mountain, under the third. In addition, 96 Brigade was pressed into service vice 29 Brigade, in the tussle over the bridge near Dera Baba Nanak.

From a military point of view, the broad front front plan of XI was a necessity as well as beneficial....
...there are three approaches from Indian side towards lahore ---Amritsar-Lahore (shortest), Harike-Khalra-Barki and via Kasur....

XI Corps attack along these approaches, with a Division each, had the advantage of a converging attack (since all these approaches converge on Lahore)....which would make it difficult for PA 10 and 11 Division to hold....converging attack also meant that the more XI Corps advanced, the problem of inter Divisions (7, 15, 4 MD) support in terms of shifting of schwerpunkt would get easier...
....However, conversely, from PA view, the more XI attack came inside Pakistan, the more compact PA defences would become...its just like you may have a 100 men against 1, but due to geo constraints you have to pass through a defile or a single door, as a result, that 1 man can hold a bigger force for a long period of time....like 300 Spartans.

In order to cover the wide gap between 15 and 7 Division, IA deployed an adhoc force name RAJA TAL force.

XI also took away 96 Brigade under its own direct command in order to protect Amritsar against any PA attempt to take it..


Just a point of trivia....the presence of PA 11 Division was NOT KNOWN to Indian int orgs before the war.....they came to know about it once they came face to face with it


Coming specifically to Lahore and PA 10 Division

Main advantages enjoyed by PA 10 Division were....
BRB....already running parallel to IB, a ready made defence line.....ideally located at a distance from IB which allow PA to sufficiently attrite IA attack before the battle of BRB starts....
1/5 of 10 Division front in the north, almost 9000 yards......IA will have to face twin obstacles in the form of BRB and Ravi both...
Two approaches from Indian side towards Lahore...IA force to advance wide apart from IB, which allow 10 Division to respond to both thrusts separately without facing the joint power of 2 IA divisions....

THE BRIDGE AT DOGRAI: 15 DIV.

In keeping with the broad vision of capturing all 4 bridges across water obstacles that the PA had planned to use to defend itself and its territory minus what lay on the Indian side, the Indian 15 Infantry Div had been set the objective of reaching the bridge at Dograi, only a few kms from Lahore, and within shelling distance of the Lahore International Airport. The division had the 38 and 54 Brigades, and we have seen that 38 Brigade was busy with the bridge at Bhaini Dhilwan (that was ultimately captured on 14th September). That left Brigadier Rikh and his three battalions to deal with the bridge at Dograi.

The plan was simple.

3 Jat would take up position at the villages of Gosal and Dial, just 4 kms from the border at Wagah, and establish a firm base at Milestone 14 on the Lahore Road. 15 Dogra would leapfrog that position and attack the actual bridge another 3.5 kms on. Simultaneously 13 Punjab would make a right hook and capture another bridge that lay a little further south on the Dograi (or Dograe Kalan, as Google Maps prefers to call it) and Jallo.

With this, four out of five bridges that might be used for a break-out by the Pakistan Army would have been bottled up.

Plans last, according to military officers, until the moment of contact with the enemy. Quite in keeping with this aphorism, nothing went according to plan for this plan. It started off very well, with 3 Jat achieving its objectives and settling down to its well-earned rest and vantage point for the rest of the struggle. 15 Dogra faced problems from its kick-off point itself, and had to use 14 Horse to see off their unwanted company. By the time they reached the 3 Jat, they claimed they had suffered too many casualties to go on and take their objective, the bridge. 13 Punjab also got into a corner at Jallo Railway Station, on their way to their objective, suffered heavy casualties, and were stopped in their tracks.

[I am sorry to report that another set of notes taking this forward, through the delegation of the operation to capture the east bank of the Ichhogil Canal to 3 Jat, their crossing of the Canal, their inability to hold the position due to lack of support and finally an order to withdraw, and their return to the same object and capture of the east bank of the canal around the 22nd has been lost; it is not clear how.

While I will obviously re-write it, readers may please forgive the repetitive inclusion of new passages, and saving this note incrementally; as each section gets written, it will be placed on the body of this note, and saved.
]

THE BRIDGE AT DOGRAI – DELEGATION TO 3 JAT AND THE ATTACK ON THE EAST BANK

With the failure of the designated units to take up their assignments, Brigadier Rikh came up to Milestone 14 to confer with Lt. Col. Desmond Hayde, CO of 3 Jat. He asked 3 Jat if they would take up the task of 15 Dogra, to attack the east bank of the Icchogil Canal. Hayde agreed. By then a squadron of 14 Horse had arrived at Milestone 14, so they were roped in; it was agreed that one troop would go along with the Jats, and the other would follow after the settlement of Dograi had been cleared. With all this cleared and agreed all around, 3 Jat moved into action around 09:00 HRS on the 6th. They walked straight into an air attack, and lost men; in addition, they lost their recoilless rifles as well, and were left helpless against armour. This was to have critical consequences later.

As the leading company of 3 Jat collected themselves after the air attack, and moved forward on the GT Road, at this point running east-west, they came under heavy fire. Hayde then ordered the party to swing to the north and circle around the settlement. At the outset of this looping advance, they faced artillery fire while they were on the open field, got through it, and then attacked the fortifications on the east bank of the Canal.

The attack was successful. 3 Jat managed to clear the defences that they attacked on the east bank, and forced the troops stationed there to retreat to the west bank.

THE BRIDGE AT DOGRAI – BATAPORE AND ATTOKE AWAN

On inspecting the scene, Hayde realised that the bridge had been demolished by the defenders, but had fallen down neatly along its foundations, meaning that it could still be crossed as it had fallen. He led two companies across in the teeth of defending fire, and stationed them to north and south of the GT Road beyond the canal, in Attoke Awan and in Batapore respectively.

This was the furthest that Indian troops penetrated in 1965.

Unfortunately, the situation was not stable, and both companies had to retreat in about four hours, only for the battalion to be flung into battle just two weeks later, to engage with the Pakistan Army in the very hard-fought Battle of Dograi.

THE BRIDGE AT DOGRAI – FOR WANT OF A NAIL

Having got to the west bank of the Ichhogil Canal, the two companies of 3 Jat found themselves totally abandoned by their brigade. The company in Attoke Awan was driven back across the canal by heavy shelling from Sherman tanks. At this point, a troop of 14 Horse arrived on the east bank (it had been planned that one troop would accompany the original attack on the east bank, and the other would follow once Dograi had been pacified, but thanks to Hayde’s northward loop around Dograi, neither troop kept up – this was the earlier troop that had proceeded cautiously a quiescent Dograi and reached the bridge). Their covering fire encouraged Hayde to cross once again, and to reoccupy positions on the north side, just as before.

He was unable to communicate with his brigade HQ, as the equipment for man-packing their radio set had failed to arrive in the morning, so he sent three messengers to the 14th Horse to message brigade HQ and ask for anti-tank equipment; finally, since he got no replies, he sent off one of his officers. There was still no response, and the situation was bad for the Attoke Awan company in its exposed position and under enemy fire. Finally, he was forced to lead this company back, crossing the canal a 4th time.

On reaching the east bank, he got a shock. Lt. Brijendra Singh informed him that he had been asked to fall back, and to bring the infantry back also.

Hayde withdrew the company that had been holding its position in Batapore and fell back as ordered. It would take several hundred lives in a bloody battle two weeks later to get back to the east bank, and the only reason for this was the indecision of Brig. Rikh, and the panicky state of mind of the divisional commander, Major General Niranjan Prasad.
Click to expand...


Good of you to mention PAF attacks against 54 Brigade ad 15 Dogra. PAF later on attacked 38 Brigade as well, 13 Punjab was routed as a result.

Reasons that IA was not able to consolidate 3 Jat success...
Repeated PAF strikes on follow-up echelons
Lack of foresight on the part of IA commanders
Absence of determined leadership at IA Brigade upwards
....in effect, it was a cheap victory which was thrown away


Just a side note....
There was a real worry on Indian side after the move of 2 IABG from Lahore front to Khem Karan on 13 Sep
XI Corps Commander, being a Sikh himself, somehow was haunted by Pak thrust towards Amritsar...therefore he constituted BHARAT FORCE, which was composed of RAJA TAL force and minor units of 2 IABG, its task being to save Amritsar while being prepared to support 15 Division...interesting point to note is that there was NO armr reserve with GOC 15 Division or Commander Bharat Force.

@Joe Shearer
50 Para Brigade attack...
 
1775387022170.png

From a military point of view, the broad front front plan of XI was a necessity as well as beneficial....
...there are three approaches from Indian side towards lahore ---Amritsar-Lahore (shortest), Harike-Khalra-Barki and via Kasur....

XI Corps faced a major battle at each of these entrances, its 15 Division at Dograi on the Amritsar-Lahore approach, its 7 Division at Barki and its 4 Mountain Division at Kasur - Khem Karan - Asal Uttar.

XI Corps attack along these approaches, with a Division each, had the advantage of a converging attack (since all these approaches converge on Lahore)....which would make it difficult for PA 10 and 11 Division to hold....converging attack also meant that the more XI Corps advanced, the problem of inter Divisions (7, 15, 4 MD) support in terms of shifting of schwerpunkt would get easier...
....However, conversely, from PA view, the more XI attack came inside Pakistan, the more compact PA defences would become...its just like you may have a 100 men against 1, but due to geo constraints you have to pass through a defile or a single door, as a result, that 1 man can hold a bigger force for a long period of time....like 300 Spartans.
Click to expand...

One of the reasons that Harbaksh gave, and that in retrospect I should have taken on board with much greater respect, was his logic that the Ichhogil Canal was a two-edged sword: that while it was a formidable defence for the Pakistan Army against any attack on Lahore by the Indian Army, if the Indian Army could traverse the land gap between the border and the canal, the canal would become the Indian Army defensive line against the Pakistan Army itself.

This was also a reason for attacking the four bridges - Dera Baba Nanak, Bhaini Dhilwan, Dograi and the minor bridge near Jallo - to stop up any opening for counter-attack; so, too, for the bridge at Barki. The bridges further south, within the area of 4 Mountain Division near Kasur, are not included in these.

In order to cover the wide gap between 15 and 7 Division, IA deployed an adhoc force name RAJA TAL force.

XI also took away 96 Brigade under its own direct command in order to protect Amritsar against any PA attempt to take it..

THE BRIDGE AT BHAINI DHILWAN AND 96 BRIGADE

96 Brigade keeps popping in and out of the narrative; it may be recalled that 38 Brigade, operating to the north of 54 Brigade under the general command of 15 Infantry Division, had assigned 1 Jat to capture the Bhaini Dhilwan bridge. As has already been mentioned, 1 Jat got to the bridge, but retreated under heavy artillery and tank shelling. This was on the first day itself, on the 6th September.

This, among other things, including the air attacks on 54 Brigade, with heavy casualties to 13 Punjab, and the difficult passage faced by 15 Dogra, that stopped it from leapfrogging 3 Jat and attacking its objective, the bridge at Dograi, altogether, gave the 15 Div commander an impression that further progress was impossible, and he conveyed this to his Corps commander, General Dhillon. On personally inspecting the situation, along with the Army commander, Dhillon found that there had been casualties, but the situation was not out of control. 15 Div was ordered to continue, and 6 Kumaon was detached from 96 Brigade to support 1 Jat in taking the Bhaini Dhilwan bridge. This was attempted on 7th September, but did not succeed. On 8th September, the Pakistan Army counter-attacked, and put pressure on the combined forces of 6 Kumaon and 1 Jat, on the Ranian axis where they had retreated from their firm base established to attack the bridge.

To relieve pressure on 15 Div., 2 Armoured Brigade under Theograj, fresh from its exploits in the Kasur sector, was brought in on 13th September. 96 Brigade was freed up to take on the pressure, and by 14th September, had pushed back against the attacks, and captured the bridge at Bhaini Dhilwan.

Just a point of trivia....the presence of PA 11 Division was NOT KNOWN to Indian int orgs before the war.....they came to know about it once they came face to face with it

This adds to the failure of Military Intelligence to anticipate trouble for XV Corps, and to spot preparations for Grand Slam against 10 Division of XV Corps.

Coming specifically to Lahore and PA 10 Division

Main advantages enjoyed by PA 10 Division were....
BRB....already running parallel to IB, a ready made defence line.....ideally located at a distance from IB which allow PA to sufficiently attrite IA attack before the battle of BRB starts....
1/5 of 10 Division front in the north, almost 9000 yards......IA will have to face twin obstacles in the form of BRB and Ravi both...
Two approaches from Indian side towards Lahore...IA force to advance wide apart from IB, which allow 10 Division to respond to both thrusts separately without facing the joint power of 2 IA divisions....
Click to expand...

As you mentioned in a parallel discussion on US 3 Army under Patton during the Battle of the Bulge, the numbers were approximately the same, but the cohesion among the 3 Corps that Patton handled was severely more effective than the cohesion among the 3 Corps, XV Corps, XI Corps and I Corps, that Indian Army Western Command handled.

Good of you to mention PAF attacks against 54 Brigade ad 15 Dogra. PAF later on attacked 38 Brigade as well, 13 Punjab was routed as a result.

I wonder if you have Major General Jogindar Singh's book* on the conflict. He was Chief of Staff to Harbaksh Singh, and had rather a high opinion of himself. On this point, of PAF activity, Harbaksh lays the blame squarely on him for the failure of the IAF to give the Army support, stating that without consulting him, Jogindar had consented to the withdrawal of the IAF from Ambala. Harbaksh was unable to get air cover although originally XI Corps had been assigned 24 sorties and air control teams had been attached to Army formations.

Behind The Scene: An Analysis of India's Military Operations 1947-1971 Maj Gen (Retd) JOGINDAR SINGH, VSM (Class I) ISBN: 9781897829202

Reasons that IA was not able to consolidate 3 Jat success...
Repeated PAF strikes on follow-up echelons
Lack of foresight on the part of IA commanders
Absence of determined leadership at IA Brigade upwards
....in effect, it was a cheap victory which was thrown away

At one point, Col. Hayde was less than 5 kms from Lahore International Airport.

Just a side note....
There was a real worry on Indian side after the move of 2 IABG from Lahore front to Khem Karan on 13 Sep
XI Corps Commander, being a Sikh himself, somehow was haunted by Pak thrust towards Amritsar...therefore he constituted BHARAT FORCE, which was composed of RAJA TAL force and minor units of 2 IABG, its task being to save Amritsar while being prepared to support 15 Division...interesting point to note is that there was NO armr reserve with GOC 15 Division or Commander Bharat Force.
Click to expand...

This, as you know, was due to the sudden recent formation of I Corps and posting of Major General Dunn as Corps Commander; originally 1 Armoured Div was the armoured reserve of XI Corps.

@Joe Shearer
50 Para Brigade attack...

Coming to that, as a prelude to the Battle of Dograi.
 
1775387122345.png

THE LEAD-UP TO THE BATTLE OF DOGRAI

We had got to the point where 3 Jat had had to fall back to its Brigade HQ under orders from a Brigade Commander who saw that his own Division commander apparently had no confidence in the outcome of the battle. One of the outcomes of the repeated failures of Major General Niranjan Prasad in positions of command, of 4 Div in NEFA, of 25 Division in Kashmir, and finally, twice, separately, of 15 Division at Dograi, was his replacement with Major General Mohinder Singh, a far more active and forward-looking commander; also, Brigadier Rikh, who had proved so susceptible to the influence of his commanding officer’s moods and fancies, was evacuated due to injury, and replaced by Brigadier Niranjan Singh.

Some preparatory moves followed, serving as a prelude to the blood-soaked Battle of Dograi.

15 Division had been reinforced by 50 (Para) Brigade, as 38 and 54 Brigade had already taken a pounding in the first 6 days of the campaign from 6th September to 14th September.

Just to remind ourselves of the actions in that earlier period, Niranjan Prasad barely survived his panic attacks on the 6th and his recall of 3 Jat after they had managed a toehold for themselves in Batapore and Attoke Awan. He also survived a major battle for professional survival, that being his interview with his irate Corps commander and Army commander, with their instructions to 38 Brigade in his presence to press on and capture their target of the Bhaini Dhilwan Bridge. By this time, 1 Jat having suffered casualties and fallen back, 6 Kumaon from the Corps reserve, 96 Brigade, was asked to step in. They moved forward at dusk, but got stuck on the way. In trying to reach them physically, wireless communications having failed, Niranjan Prasad was ambushed, and, although he escaped personally, 12 men of his party and 4 jeeps were captured by the Pakistani forces.

After this huge propaganda success, and with a continued failure to meet his objectives weighing on the minds of his senior officers, Niranjan Prasad had been relieved on the 7th September itself, by Mohinder Singh.

The military situation reflected the gloomy command situation.

On the night of the 7th September, both brigades attacked objectives on the east bank of the Ichhogil Canal, and 96 Brigade continued to try for success capturing the Bhaini Dhilwan Bridge. None of these attacks succeeded. The next day, the 8th, the PA had strengthened its defences. It launched an armoured attack against the front-running Indian troops, and by the second day after that, by the 10th September, 15 Dogra’s position at Dial was overrun.

On the 9th September, the 50 Independent (Para) Brigade had come into the theatre, and helped to relieve the beleaguered Indian forces. The pressure continued; a little further south, 6 Kumaon and 1 Jat had left their positions and moved back on the evening of 8th September, on their failure to capture the Bhaini Dhilwan Bridge. This was a blessing in disguise; the 2 Independent Armoured Brigade, fresh from its outstanding achievements at Asal Uttar, was wheeled in on the 11th September, stiffened the opposition and stopped the Pakistani advance, and allowed 96 Brigade, with morale uplifted, to attack and finally capture the Bhaini Dhilwan Bridge by the evening of the 14th September.

Further reinforcements arrived on the 11th, when the 41 Mountain Brigade that had been swept aside by Pakistani armour in Chhamb, and had fallen back behind 28 Brigade, was re-assigned to this sector. It must be presumed that they had recovered from the bad scare it had got, going up against armour with no anti-tank weaponry, and had been equipped for battle on the open plains. So before the battle commenced, 50 Independent (Para) Brigade (on the 9th), 2 Independent Armoured Brigade (on the 12th) and 41 Mountain Brigade (on the 14th) had joined 15 Division. This was in addition to 38, 54 and 96 Brigade.

THE TROUBLES OF THE PARA BRIGADE

With this background, that takes us up to the end of day on the 14th September, we find Major General Mohinder Singh, determined to undo the errors of his predecessor, ordering the 50 (Para) Brigade to capture a stretch of the east bank of the Ichhogil Canal up to a rail bridge, reported destroyed, but fate uncertain, and to destroy another small bridge over the canal on a road between Dograi and Jallo. All this was to be done by 16th September. That date didn’t work; the Pakistan Army was discovered to be in greater strength than thought, and the attack was delayed by a day. 2 Para, a constituent battalion of the brigade, did capture the road bridge, but suffered horrible casualties, about 60 jawans; the bridge, incidentally,had already been blown up. So 60 soldiers died because there had been no possibility of aerial reconnaissance.

Brigadier Nambiar was removed from command. The new, dynamic division commander was determined to make a difference, and took Nambiar’s decision to dig in some distance away from the actual canal, to avoid fire from the west bank fortifications of the Pakistan Army. This was not taken well, and he lost his job.

Meanwhile, Nambiar’s worst apprehensions were realised because the Pakistani defenders, operating out of a village between the Para’s position and the canal, kept attacking the Indian troops, who suffered heavily from these attacks and from shelling and attacks by combined groups of armour and infantry. The PAF made its presence felt and caused, along with the others, heavy casualties to the Brigade.

The only silver lining to this very dark cloud was the Paras clearing of the village, Jhuggian Mohammed Baksh, on the night of 21/22nd September

As it happened, the Para Brigade’s movements were part of a larger movement, that turned into a full-scale battle, the Battle of Dograi.

THE BATTLE OF DOGRAE KALAN

I have been dreading writing about this battle; the carnage reminds one of the worst phases of the trench warfare of the First World War.

15 Division had decided that its three brigades (96 now being attached to it for all practical purposes), 38, 54 and 96 should advance simultaneously against three different and widely separated objectives; that was the prevailing style of this conflict, just to remind @Panzerkiel of the discussion about the concentration of 3 Army Corps in different hands, in the hands of Patton, and in the hands of Western Command. It was nothing to do with the ability of the individual commanders, as it happens; the topography and the line-up of the opposed troops was completely different.

So 96 Brigade that had last been attacking Bhaini-Dhilwan was to go for that objective once again; surprise was presumably not a consideration. 54 was to capture (re-capture) Dograe Kalan; 38 was to move forward to the line of the Ichhogil Canal. It is not surprising that an aroused and very hostile opponent ensured that both 96 Brigade and 38 Brigade failed; 54 Brigade succeeded, but at a heavy cost.

The plan for 54 Brigade was that of its three battalions, 13 Punjab (last met trying to get to the Dograe Kalan- Jallo Bridge on the 6th September, and suffering heavy casualties to the PAF ground attacks) would go down the GT Road and clear up the Pakistani concentration under cover of artillery fire; 15 Dogra, that had been holding the front line near Dial, would withdraw to remain in reserve; 3 Jat would swing out across the fields to the north of Dograe Kalan (once again) and take the village.

13 Punjab faced the Pakistan Army’s 8 Punjab, 16 Punjab and 18 Baluch. The irony is all-permeating. The 13 Punjab advanced under artillery cover, but came to a standstill soon after, due to very heavy artillery shelling. They got Indian artillery, the integral artillery of the division, to open fire again. Under cover of this massive exchange of artillery fire, 3 Jat quietly moved off-road and across the fields for their 5 kms. (!) approach march. Lt. Col. Hayde, whom we have met before crossing back and forth over the Ichhogil Canal to Attoke Awan and back, twice, had divided his attacking force to attack in company strength different sectors assigned to them. When the leading company on the outermost edge got close to the Canal, the Pakistani defenders opened fire.

I will not describe the battle in great detail. Reading accounts of the troops charging into machine gun fire was extremely trying. Here is one excerpt from Desmond Hayde:

“Suddenly, all hell broke loose from the East bank [of the Ichhogil Canal]. Tracers completely lit up the air and you could hear the angry buzzing of lethal lead, machine-gun fire appeared to be coming from every boot of the bank...with astounding courage, the forward platoons turned en masse and charged into this mass of fire....the casualties to the men were appalling; some went down in the minefields and others fell to machine gun fire, but through dogged determination the gap was closed and a terrific hand-to-hand fight....ensued.”

The battalion lost 80 men here alone. In the CO’s party of eight, only three men were left standing.

On the other side of the village, 13 Punjab was still fighting it out on the GT Road. At 06:15 HRS on the 22nd September, Hayde then opened fire with a medium machine gun and a recoilless rifle from the rear of the Pakistani ranks (his occupation of Dograe Kalan having outflanked the Pakistani position at Milestone 13) and that unexpected fire succeeded in dislodging the defenders.

The fighting did not stop. Around 07:30 HRS, Pakistani armour opened fire from the north, and were fought off with recoilless rifles. Until the ceasefire, however, Pakistani artillery did not let up.

Hayde now asked for reinforcements, and two companies of 15 Dogra joined him on the 22nd afternoon. This reinforcement helped 3 Jat to see off two separate attacks.

The casualties on both sides were horrific.

After the ceasefire, the Pakistanis collected their dead; 247 of them were counted in the 3 Jat area. The Jats lost an equal number, 216, of whom 10 were officers and 5 were JCOs. These 463 soldiers lost their lives solely because of a confused and timid Indian Major General.

This brings us to the end of the narration of events involving 15 Infantry Division.
 
Some additions...

7 Sep...GOC 10 Div decided to counter attack with the reserve brigade, 22 Brigade, east of BRB to cut GT Road between Dograi and Dial....Risks involved in this attack...a weakened 22 Brigade since it had already detached some forces to reinforce main defences and moreover, no rehearsal had been carried out for counter attack on the eastern side of BRB.....
However, GOC reasoned if he delays his counter attack, IA will be able to reinforce and attack with fresh vigor, a fresh attack with fresh troops will have a greater potential to breakthrough.

Hence 22 brigade counter attack was launched...in North-South direction, along the eastern bank of BRB...complete surprise was achieved since it was an entirely unexpected direction of attack..GT Road was therefore cut at Milestone 13.


A word about 50 Para Brigade attack...

Commander 50 Para Brigade, being originally part of Army reserves, was not happy on being placed under command an infantry division. He therefore displayed a mostly casual behavior and kept asking for written orders from Army HQ.

His 17 Sep attack went in with only ONE battalion, 2 Para, which went to ground short of its objective and reported completion.

His 18 Sep attack was again pulled back by the Brigade Commander himself....overall it displayed sluggish and ineffective leadership at brigade and unit level.


Overall, Indians were getting desperate in order to show some gains since ceasefire was being talked about... therefore simultaneous attacks were planned for 21/22 Sep by 15 Infantry and 4 Mountain Divisions...out of which 54 Brigade managed to re-capture Dograi, 50 Para Brigade got partial success while attacks of 38 and 96 Brigades were a failure.


A word about the second battle of Dograi....

Weakness in PA defence of Dograi can be attributed to...
-continuous engagement of defences by IA tanks and artillery in the days prior to attack
-Multiple IAF sorties
-Continuous casualties in the defending unit with no fresh troops
-Overall, gradual attrition of manpower and equipment

Dograi could have been held....however on 21 Sep, B Squadron ex 23 Cavalry which was covering the northern flank of Dograi defences, withdrew under local orders to the west bank of BRB......this withdrawal was not known to 16 Punjab (Dograi) nor to the Brigade HQ.

3 Jat attack from the northern flank of Dograi, therefore, which should have been met by the firepower of the armor squadron, managed to exploit the gap left by our armor and reached the rear of Dograi defences, behind 16 Punjab.

16 Punjab was therefore caught between the cauldron of 54 Brigade and 3 Jat, on being ordered to withdraw towards BRB, it was decimated.

10 Division managed to mount a counter attack swiftly in broad daylight to re-take Dograi which was heavily repulsed.
 
1775387180791.png

Some additions...

7 Sep...GOC 10 Div decided to counter attack with the reserve brigade, 22 Brigade, east of BRB to cut GT Road between Dograi and Dial....Risks involved in this attack...a weakened 22 Brigade since it had already detached some forces to reinforce main defences and moreover, no rehearsal had been carried out for counter attack on the eastern side of BRB.....
However, GOC reasoned if he delays his counter attack, IA will be able to reinforce and attack with fresh vigor, a fresh attack with fresh troops will have a greater potential to breakthrough.

Hence 22 brigade counter attack was launched...in North-South direction, along the eastern bank of BRB...complete surprise was achieved since it was an entirely unexpected direction of attack..GT Road was therefore cut at Milestone 13.
Click to expand...
I really need a reference for the Pakistani side of the narrative. This makes so much clear. Milestone 13 being a target for the attack by 15 Div on the 21st/22nd, for instance.

A word about 50 Para Brigade attack...

Commander 50 Para Brigade, being originally part of Army reserves, was not happy on being placed under command an infantry division. He therefore displayed a mostly casual behavior and kept asking for written orders from Army HQ.

His 17 Sep attack went in with only ONE battalion, 2 Para, which went to ground short of its objective and reported completion.
Click to expand...
It is strange and painful to read this. Whatever his differences, he must have known that pushing out an attacking force with insufficient strength would cause heavy casualties. His desire to withdraw, in this context, doesn't seem to be rooted in concern for his men, but rather in a work-to-rule attitude. And his men paid the price.

His 18 Sep attack was again pulled back by the Brigade Commander himself....overall it displayed sluggish and ineffective leadership at brigade and unit level.
This must have been an especially sensitive point, considering that several brigades under 15 Div had been led with such indifference.

Overall, Indians were getting desperate in order to show some gains since ceasefire was being talked about... therefore simultaneous attacks were planned for 21/22 Sep by 15 Infantry and 4 Mountain Divisions...out of which 54 Brigade managed to re-capture Dograi, 50 Para Brigade got partial success while attacks of 38 and 96 Brigades were a failure.
A word about the second battle of Dograi....

Weakness in PA defence of Dograi can be attributed to...
-continuous engagement of defences by IA tanks and artillery in the days prior to attack
-Multiple IAF sorties
-Continuous casualties in the defending unit with no fresh troops
-Overall, gradual attrition of manpower and equipment
The support from the IAF is not mentioned at all in Praval, for instance; air force oriented narratives seldom give details of sorties made for ground support.

Dograi could have been held....however on 21 Sep, B Squadron ex 23 Cavalry which was covering the northern flank of Dograi defences, withdrew under local orders to the west bank of BRB......this withdrawal was not known to 16 Punjab (Dograi) nor to the Brigade HQ.
Presumably the orders were from the regiment commander.

3 Jat attack from the northern flank of Dograi, therefore, which should have been met by the firepower of the armor squadron, managed to exploit the gap left by our armor and reached the rear of Dograi defences, behind 16 Punjab.

16 Punjab was therefore caught between the cauldron of 54 Brigade and 3 Jat, on being ordered to withdraw towards BRB, it was decimated.
This makes terrible reading. Most of the 267 casualties must have been 16 Punjab, then.

10 Division managed to mount a counter attack swiftly in broad daylight to re-take Dograi which was heavily repulsed.
Your added perspective makes this another very messy battle, and makes clear much of the very heavy casualty rate on both sides.


ABOUT 15 INFANTRY DIVISION

With this in front of us, what do we observe about units of the Indian Army, in common?

1. At that time, the Indian Army was strongly oriented to the Infantry. From the march of 5 kms over open fields by 3 Jat to get to their objectives, to using mountain troops to fight on the plains, without any serious anti-tank weapons to talk of, against an adversary with the latest, best tanks, this characteristic comes out very clearly.

2. The corollary is that given armoured support, these infantry formations did well. Examples: the support given by 14 Cavalry to 3 Jat to fend off the Shermans driving the Jats crazy in their bridgehead at Attoke Awan; the support given by 2 Independent Armoured Brigade to 96 Brigade, helping that brigade to capture the bridge at Bhaini-Dhilwan.

3. The PAF was very active, and troubled the 13 Punjab during their march to their jumping off point; actually rendering it ineffective as a fighting force for a little while; it troubled other IA units considerably during the conflict, most notoriously 50 Independent (Para) Brigade.

4. The IAF was absent during the early stages of this engagement. General Harbaksh Singh traces it back to his Chief of Staff, Major General Jogindar Singh, who apparently allowed the IAF to retire to remote locations without informing the GOC-in-C. That made nonsense of the prior arrangement of 24 sorties in support of the division. However, it is reported that they were very effective later.

5. Since the IA had war-gamed these situations, as stated by Jogindar Singh, it is odd that we find units arriving at the battlefield from very remote locations, as far as Ambala, and immediately being deployed, sometimes with vital pieces of equipment missing. 3 Jat went into action without its wireless set and lost contact with its Brigade HQ at a vital time, and thanks to the lack of communications between forward-deployed units and its brigade headquarters, nearly 500 troops died.
 
1775387251750.png

Joe, from Haydes’ account it’s really disheartening to see that Jats had to make do with mere Super Bazookas to deal with armour. Bazookas were unreliable even during WW2 to use them after 20 years against far more advanced Tanks was suicide. It’s also shocking to see that an Inf Battalion only had 6 RCLs per unit. That they could achieve that much speaks volumes of their performance.
2. The corollary is that given armoured support, these infantry formations did well. Examples: the support given by 14 Cavalry to 3 Jat to fend off the Shermans driving the Jats crazy in their bridgehead at Attoke Awan; the support given by 2 Independent Armoured Brigade to 96 Brigade, helping that brigade to capture the bridge at Bhaini-Dhilwan.
Given their lack of anti armour capabilities Tank support would be a must for a successful operation I believe.
3. The PAF was very active, and troubled the 13 Punjab during their march to their jumping off point; actually rendering it ineffective as a fighting force for a little while; it troubled other IA units considerably during the conflict, most notoriously 50 Independent (Para) Brigade.
The way PAF performed suppressing IAFs combat operations and simultaneously providing effective CAS speaks volumes of their professionalism especially given their small size
4. The IAF was absent during the early stages of this engagement. General Harbaksh Singh traces it back to his Chief of Staff, Major General Jogindar Singh, who apparently allowed the IAF to retire to remote locations without informing the GOC-in-C. That made nonsense of the prior arrangement of 24 sorties in support of the division. However, it is reported that they were very effective later.

5. Since the IA had war-gamed these situations, as stated by Jogindar Singh, it is odd that we find units arriving at the battlefield from very remote locations, as far as Ambala, and immediately being deployed, sometimes with vital pieces of equipment missing. 3 Jat went into action without its wireless set and lost contact with its Brigade HQ at a vital time, and thanks to the lack of communications between forward-deployed units and its brigade headquarters, nearly 500 troops died.[/QUOTE]
Some bugger stole my Behind the Scenes book. Or else I would have looked it up again in context to this thread. Neve lend a book to anyone.
 
1775387280835.png

I read it a very long time back so don’t recall it much, except his tirades against Harbaksh Singh. I am presently reading War Dispatches, and plan to re read KC Praval.

When you read Praval, you will have problems with two several things.

In 15 Div operations, for instance, he suddenly launches 29 Brigade at the bridge at Dera Baba Nanak, without saying where it is from. He doesn't say anything about 96 Brigade, and I had to learn from PanzerKiel about its status as reserve. Integral armour is hardly ever mentioned except to say that 14 Horse turned up and fired at the Pakistani Shermans to the north of Attoke Awan.

Then he gets delicate when talking about the performance of units. 41 Mtn Brigade couldn't hold out against the Pakistani armoured attack; not surprising, but it is made to look as if the Brigade vanished from under the noses of the PA tanks like puffs of smoke, only to re-materialise on the other side of 29 Brigade at Akhnoor. He doesn't mention the debacle when 161 Artillery Regiment abandoned its guns, and that Major General Oberoi was sacked for failing to recover them. He doesn't mention that 2 Battalion COs had been removed from command, from those whose battalions were in action at Chhamb.

Then there is Harbaksh Singh's very sour remark about Niranjan Prasad having been a failure with 4 Division in NEFA (Arunachal Pradesh). In the same passage, he mentions another failure while commanding 25 Division. When was that? Was it possibly during that almost open mutiny when 25 Division was sought to be launched against Haji Pir Pass, but the Division commander took the permission of Katoch, the XV Corps commander, not to pursue the objective. It took strong threats of disciplinary action to get the COs moving. Was this Niranjan Prasad in charge of 25 Div, and was this the poor stint that he was alleged to have made before coming to 15 Infantry Division?

You will have difficulties in reading the maps. For the time and in that age when his book was written, his maps are naturally handwritten, but not very readable.

He remains, however, a very valuable and comprehensive contributor. I am sure you will enjoy reading the book.

Name of the book?

1965 War: The Inside Story
Defence Minister Y. B. Chavan's Diary of India-Pakistan War
by
R. D. Pradhan
 
ABOUT 15 INFANTRY DIVISION

With this in front of us, what do we observe about units of the Indian Army, in common?

1. At that time, the Indian Army was strongly oriented to the Infantry. From the march of 5 kms over open fields by 3 Jat to get to their objectives, to using mountain troops to fight on the plains, without any serious anti-tank weapons to talk of, against an adversary with the latest, best tanks, this characteristic comes out very clearly.

2. The corollary is that given armoured support, these infantry formations did well. Examples: the support given by 14 Cavalry to 3 Jat to fend off the Shermans driving the Jats crazy in their bridgehead at Attoke Awan; the support given by 2 Independent Armoured Brigade to 96 Brigade, helping that brigade to capture the bridge at Bhaini-Dhilwan.

3. The PAF was very active, and troubled the 13 Punjab during their march to their jumping off point; actually rendering it ineffective as a fighting force for a little while; it troubled other IA units considerably during the conflict, most notoriously 50 Independent (Para) Brigade.

4. The IAF was absent during the early stages of this engagement. General Harbaksh Singh traces it back to his Chief of Staff, Major General Jogindar Singh, who apparently allowed the IAF to retire to remote locations without informing the GOC-in-C. That made nonsense of the prior arrangement of 24 sorties in support of the division. However, it is reported that they were very effective later.

5. Since the IA had war-gamed these situations, as stated by Jogindar Singh, it is odd that we find units arriving at the battlefield from very remote locations, as far as Ambala, and immediately being deployed, sometimes with vital pieces of equipment missing. 3 Jat went into action without its wireless set and lost contact with its Brigade HQ at a vital time, and thanks to the lack of communications between forward-deployed units and its brigade headquarters, nearly 500 troops died.

I believe there is a logical explanation for almost everything....


1. At that time, the Indian Army was strongly oriented to the Infantry. From the march of 5 kms over open fields by 3 Jat to get to their objectives, to using mountain troops to fight on the plains, without any serious anti-tank weapons to talk of, against an adversary with the latest, best tanks, this characteristic comes out very clearly.

1965 war caught the IA in the midst of its post 1962 re-org and expansion. Since IA was still raising new formations, especially mountain divisions, therefore some mountains division did have the dual role....NEFA as well as Pakistan...... which is followed even as we speak. Rest of course the organization and training of mountain divisions is not suited for anything other than mountains.....they were used despite these disadvantages.

2. The corollary is that given armoured support, these infantry formations did well. Examples: the support given by 14 Cavalry to 3 Jat to fend off the Shermans driving the Jats crazy in their bridgehead at Attoke Awan; the support given by 2 Independent Armoured Brigade to 96 Brigade, helping that brigade to capture the bridge at Bhaini-Dhilwan.

Firepower.....doctrines of that time, of both sides, emphasized use of firepower instead of mobility of tanks. Presence of artillery and tanks always proved to be a booster for infantry except in some rare instances when infantry managed well without them.....

3. The PAF was very active, and troubled the 13 Punjab during their march to their jumping off point; actually rendering it ineffective as a fighting force for a little while; it troubled other IA units considerably during the conflict, most notoriously 50 Independent (Para) Brigade.

IA columns on roads presented good enough targets for PAF.

Something which normally everyone misses are the effects of PA SSG ops against IAF airfields in 1965 (like readers miss the great effects of Gibralter, term it a failure and move on). A number of IA formations were employed to hunt for PA SSG paratroopers, their clogged vehicles on roads were also found by PAF and heavy casualties were inflicted.

Even till now, both PA and IA are not properly trained to conduct ops of all types in the face of heavy air attacks....hence we have seen that normally in our region, air power tips the balance. In my opinion, it should not be the case. Highly trained troops can adopt lot many measures to negate the effect of enemy air superiority. China (1950) and North Vietnam (60s/70s) are some major examples.

5. Since the IA had war-gamed these situations, as stated by Jogindar Singh, it is odd that we find units arriving at the battlefield from very remote locations, as far as Ambala, and immediately being deployed, sometimes with vital pieces of equipment missing. 3 Jat went into action without its wireless set and lost contact with its Brigade HQ at a vital time, and thanks to the lack of communications between forward-deployed units and its brigade headquarters, nearly 500 troops died.

Such things are part of normal drills and procedures. However, as mentioned before as well, IA was under great pressure to open the front quickly on international border due to the bad situation in Akhnur. Therefore, many IA formations attacked from the line of march, without stopping, without coordinating basic things with their supporting units, without recce.....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top