India - US Tariff and Relations | News + Updates

[Indos]

I don't know but I connect the dots more about deals that USA was expecting but india is not agreed.

USA pushed - F35 deal - india is not interested.
USA pushed - f18 for navy and F21 for airforce - india not buying it.
USA pushed - air defence - india is buying from Russia.
And the list go on !!!

USA is expecting to sell weapons to india but since india is not buying or buying from Russia.... It's hurting them most.

Agriculture is the sticky points. Buying US defense equipments is piece of cake for India with 80 billion USD annual defence budget

 

[Guynextdoor]

I don't know but I connect the dots more about deals that USA was expecting but india is not agreed.

USA pushed - F35 deal - india is not interested.
USA pushed - f18 for navy and F21 for airforce - india not buying it.
USA pushed - air defence - india is buying from Russia.
And the list go on !!!

USA is expecting to sell weapons to india but since india is not buying or buying from Russia.... It's hurting them most.

what they really want is India to alllow GMO foods and remove pharma related price controls.

Our experience with Monsanto has been bad and so we should be careful about GMO. As for pharma pricing- yeah americans how their healthcare pricing is....no thanks....

 

[Guynextdoor]

Agriculture is the sticky points. Buying US defense equipments is piece of cake for India with 80 billion USD annual defence budget

pharma might be bigger. We have kept tight controls on pharma pricing that the US drug companies hate.

 

[Raj-Hindustani]

Agriculture is the sticky points. Buying US defense equipments is piece of cake for India with 80 billion USD annual defence budget

From what I see, the india–U.S. relationship is about more than just trade — and the strain didn’t start recently. It began during, especially after he claimed credit for a supposed india–Pakistan ceasefire.

At the time, Pakistan played up to Trump, showering him with praise — the kind of flattery we often see in workplace politics: "You’re the boss, you're the best, everything happens because of you," and so on. Trump likely expected India to respond the same way, publicly acknowledging and appreciating his role. But india flatly denied any external involvement, and as we know, Trump takes that kind of rejection personally.

Then came the Iran–Israel conflict, which shifted U.S. strategic thinking again. In that scenario, Pakistan became more relevant, especially due to its proximity to Iran and Afghanistan. If the situation escalates, the U.S. may need access to Pakistani airspace or bases— something India can’t offer in that region.

On top of that, while the U.S. has encouraged India to buy American weapons and oil, India has: Bought U.S. oil - yes But not committed to major arms deals as expected And continues to trade and purchase weapons from Russia

So if this were just about trade or agriculture, the issues might’ve been resolved long ago. But the real tensions lie in geopolitics, defense strategy, and differing national interests— especially when it comes to Russia, China, and regional conflicts.

 

[Indos]

From what I see, the india–U.S. relationship is about more than just trade — and the strain didn’t start recently. It began during, especially after he claimed credit for a supposed india–Pakistan ceasefire.

At the time, Pakistan played up to Trump, showering him with praise — the kind of flattery we often see in workplace politics: "You’re the boss, you're the best, everything happens because of you," and so on. Trump likely expected India to respond the same way, publicly acknowledging and appreciating his role. But india flatly denied any external involvement, and as we know, Trump takes that kind of rejection personally.

Then came the Iran–Israel conflict, which shifted U.S. strategic thinking again. In that scenario, Pakistan became more relevant, especially due to its proximity to Iran and Afghanistan. If the situation escalates, the U.S. may need access to Pakistani airspace or bases— something India can’t offer in that region.

On top of that, while the U.S. has encouraged India to buy American weapons and oil, India has: Bought U.S. oil - yes But not committed to major arms deals as expected And continues to trade and purchase weapons from Russia

So if this were just about trade or agriculture, the issues might’ve been resolved long ago. But the real tensions lie in geopolitics, defense strategy, and differing national interests— especially when it comes to Russia, China, and regional conflicts.

There are some countries that have strong manufacturing sectors with big economy. These are countries that get the focus on Trump

Pakistan exports to US is mostly textile.

 

[Terracotta Warrior]

That ill conceived and poorly executed operation has cost them big. If US was giving them some slack for Russian ties etc in the hope that they were too important against China, well that little idea came crashing down to earth on fire like so many IAF jets. After the ass whooping India got from a far smaller / weaker neighbour, nobody with half a brain believes that India will ever be a viable option against China. The US is anything but half brained, so what reason they got left to still go easy on India, let them buy cheap Russian oil etc? What use are they if they can’t take on China for the US? Perhaps Jaishanker can answer this by writing another book titled ‘Why India Matters’.

You're making too many assumptions based on a single event. What Trump is trying to do is create pressure on India to secure a more favourable deal — all the bluster is part of that strategy.


The U.S.-India relationship is a bipartisan effort that has been carefully built over the last 25 years. What we’re seeing now is a negotiation between two major economies, discussing a trade deal whose value is equivalent to 50% of Pakistan’s GDP, in which India also holds a $45 billion trade surplus with the U.S., which is more than Pakistan’s total goods and services exports combined.


As a significant trading nation, India is simply holding its ground — and that’s what’s frustrating Trump. Eventually, there will be a deal that benefits both countries. India is in no rush to sign anything that doesn’t serve its long-term interests.

 

[Indos]

pharma might be bigger. We have kept tight controls on pharma pricing that the US drug companies hate.

As far as I know, Pharma will not be included in recent deal. Pharma and Semiconductor are still under Trump admin analysis. They likely give tariff on this sectors despite recent deal with countries. Sectoral tarrif like for automobile (25%). This is also make countries like Singapore nervous, as despite they only has 10 % tarriff but semiconductor and pharma are both accounted of 70 % of their export to US

 

[Dalit]

7 Indian companies sanctioned for oil trade with Russia including refineries

View attachment 138067

If India thought it was special they are wrong.

The US has very clearly pointed out that as long as India continues its political and economic relationship with Russia this will remain an irritant. I guess the days of waivers are finally over.

 

[Dalit]

From what I see, the india–U.S. relationship is about more than just trade — and the strain didn’t start recently. It began during, especially after he claimed credit for a supposed india–Pakistan ceasefire.

At the time, Pakistan played up to Trump, showering him with praise — the kind of flattery we often see in workplace politics: "You’re the boss, you're the best, everything happens because of you," and so on. Trump likely expected India to respond the same way, publicly acknowledging and appreciating his role. But india flatly denied any external involvement, and as we know, Trump takes that kind of rejection personally.

Then came the Iran–Israel conflict, which shifted U.S. strategic thinking again. In that scenario, Pakistan became more relevant, especially due to its proximity to Iran and Afghanistan. If the situation escalates, the U.S. may need access to Pakistani airspace or bases— something India can’t offer in that region.

On top of that, while the U.S. has encouraged India to buy American weapons and oil, India has: Bought U.S. oil - yes But not committed to major arms deals as expected And continues to trade and purchase weapons from Russia

So if this were just about trade or agriculture, the issues might’ve been resolved long ago. But the real tensions lie in geopolitics, defense strategy, and differing national interests— especially when it comes to Russia, China, and regional conflicts.

For your information, Pakistan will reap the benefits from all ends as long as it serves its interests. Just like India has been playing all sides as long as it could.

 

[Cash gk]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Vkdindian1]

For your information, Pakistan will reap the benefits from all ends as long as it serves its interests. Just like India has been playing all sides as long as it could.

For reaping those benefits, Pakistan has to have decent manufacturing sector, which is almost non-existent.
Even if the effort is started on a war footing, it has a long gestation period of anywhere from 3-4 years depending on what you try and build. That itself would also require a lot of capital.
Not impossible but very difficult.

 

[Master Chief]

I did say this trend of India buying Russian oil and it's weapons and also being able to trade on the best terms with the USA would eventually run into major problems.

India is the definition of a pariah state.

The best part is, the citizenry genuinely thinks nobody has ever figured out their double game. Every day in the west, we constantly hear of the "balancing act", as if India is some civilisational master of diplomacy.

All the genuine global powers know of India's chanakya and indeed, they always have known. The chanakiya was tolerated only because over populated Indian nation was regarded as suitable cannon fodder for (at least) 2 grand imperial projects in Asia. A lot of those perceptions suddenly changed in May 2025.

 

[Pakistan Space Agency]

And you can easily call the man who gave so much to Pakistan cartoon Azaim right?

Unfortunately for Pakistan, I think that bastard only knew how to loot and plunder the country dry in record time of just 45-months.

 

[Raj-Hindustani]

NEW DELHI: The ministry of external affairs on Friday rejected suggestions of any strain in India-Russia relations following sharp attacks from US President Donald Trump, who questioned the economic and strategic ties between the two countries.​

Responding to questions at the weekly briefing, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said: “Our bilateral relationships with various countries stand on their own merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country. India and Russia have a steady and time-tested partnership.”

03:02
'Steady, Time-Tested': India Defends Russia Ties, Oil Purchase Amid Trump’s Tariff Threat, SanctionsResponding to questions at the weekly briefing, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said: “Our bilateral relationships with various countries stand on their own merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country. India and Russia have a steady and time-tested partnership.

03:02
'

Jaiswal, when asked about Trump’s broader comments, reiterated the importance of the India-US partnership: “India and the United States share a comprehensive global strategic partnership anchored in shared interests, democratic values, and robust people-to-people ties. This partnership has weathered several transitions and challenges. We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and are confident that the relationship will continue to move forward.”
Jaiswal, when asked about Trump’s broader comments, reiterated the importance of the India-US partnership: “India and the United States share a comprehensive global strategic partnership anchored in shared interests, democratic values, and robust people-to-people ties. This partnership has weathered several transitions and challenges. We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and are confident that the relationship will continue to move forward.”

Asked about defence cooperation, Jaiswal added: “The sourcing of our defence requirements is determined solely by our national security imperatives and strategic assessments
Asked about defence cooperation, Jaiswal added: “The sourcing of our defence requirements is determined solely by our national security imperatives and strategic assessments

He declined to comment on Trump’s suggestion that India might one day purchase oil from Pakistan, saying, “I have no comments to offer in this matter


On questions related to sanctions imposed by the US on Indian companies trading with Iran, Jaiswal said, “We have taken note of the sanctions, we are looking into it.”

He also addressed reports suggesting Indian oil firms had stopped sourcing Russian oil: “You are aware of our broad approach to energy sourcing requirements, that we look at what is available in the market and the prevailing global situation. We are not aware of any specifics.”

Russia has remained India’s top oil supplier in recent months, accounting for nearly 35–40 per cent of its imports—up from just 0.2 per cent before the Ukraine war
On questions related to sanctions imposed by the US on Indian companies trading with Iran, Jaiswal said, “We have taken note of the sanctions, we are looking into it.”

He also addressed reports suggesting Indian oil firms had stopped sourcing Russian oil: “You are aware of our broad approach to energy sourcing requirements, that we look at what is available in the market and the prevailing global situation. We are not aware of any specifics.”

Russia has remained India’s top oil supplier in recent months, accounting for nearly 35–40 per cent of its imports—up from just 0.2 per cent before the Ukraine war
He declined to comment on Trump’s suggestion that India might one day purchase oil from Pakistan, saying, “I have no comments to offer in this matter

On Thursday, Union commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal told Parliament that the government is closely examining the developments and will safeguard national interest.

“Government gives utmost priority to the safeguarding of welfare of farmers, labourers, entrepreneurs, industrialists, exporters, MSMEs and stakeholders of the industrial sector,” Goyal said. “We will take all necessary steps to safeguard our national interest.”
On Thursday, Union commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal told Parliament that the government is closely examining the developments and will safeguard national interest.

“Government gives utmost priority to the safeguarding of welfare of farmers, labourers, entrepreneurs, industrialists, exporters, MSMEs and stakeholders of the industrial sector,” Goyal said. “We will take all necessary steps to safeguard our national interest.”

https://x.com/airnewsalerts?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwter

m%5E1951237534194999778%7Ctwgr%5E168dc4eacdf8411d498921f838e39f8d9c6b43e7%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=ht
tps%3A%2F%2Fd-25801118402684206255.ampproject.net%2F2507172035000%2Fframe.html

 

[Dalit]

Not good enough. Pick a side.