Indian Air Force News and Discussions ll

It is funny, whenever the Brits and BAE name potential new partners they never mention India, only Canada, Germany and Saudi. It is literally only Indian press naming India.

I guess most countries know having any reliance on India or HAL in any project is a receipe for disaster and they will end up haggling over tiny issues as Indians do by nature, and India has no tech to share.

If they have cash rich partners in line, there is no incentive at all to partner with India

GE may have been pushed into this deal by the American government as part of Quad and India's role in the "Indo-Pacific" region to build up India's military capability against China.

Sindoor showed how ineffective India is against a country that operates Chinese technology, let alone demonstrate that they "could" be effective against Chine.

India's geo-strategic role has taken a dive and crashed and burned.

Given that the "Indo-Pacific" has now been renamed to the ""Pacific" region, and the Quad is basically dead and India has no geo-strategic role in the middle east(Pakistan has taken that successfully recently) then there is no real push from the American Government on GE to push this deal through.

GE are obviously not happy with any transfer of technology as they prefer India as with any client, to be an off the the shelf customer, so hiking the price x3 is another way of saying this is "over" and for India to "get real" ..

The French are even more protective of their technology than the Americans.
 
Last edited:
GE may have been pushed into this deal by the American goverment as part of Quad and india's role in the "Indo-Pacific" region.

Given that the "Indo-Pacific" has now been renamed to the ""Pacific" region, and the Quad is basically dead and India has not geo-strategic role in the middle east(Pakistan has taken that successfully) and no role in East Asia ("Indo-Pacific") then there is no real push from the American Goverment on GE to push this deal through. GE are obviously not happy with any transfer of technology as they prefer India to be a off the the shelf customer, so hiking the price x3 is another way of saying this is "over" and for India to "get real"..

The French are even more protective of their technology than the Americans.

100% agree, not a coincedence US are cooling on India and suddenly there are "price issues" on this deal...
 
China spent tens of billions of dollars, and decades developing this engine technology and it seems they may have crossed that line of success with the WS-15 engine. Türkiye is going through that same learning process now for the KAAN engine, they have spent decades building the core infrastructure, people and institutions to get to that point. Japan has engine manufacturers, but they have not managed to cross the line of developing fast jet engines, when they do, they will pay the price in coin to develop that technology. Same goes for Korea who are now looking to start their own fast jet engine development project for the KF-21. France has an aerospace manufacturer of engines, but even with all that France has, it lags behind the UK in this field.

Fast jet military engines are hard to develop, really hard.

All this is because this technology costs serious serious money to develop and alot of time and you need deep institutions and a good quality university network to help.

Yet, India expects this countries to give over their hard earned technology for pennies on the dollar and they wonder why they don't get anywhere.
WS-19's project was running smooth like butter and already installed on airforce J-35 which says a lot, and now we have multiple VCE engine projects on going and one was already on the flying test bed.
 
Are there any Good news out of IAF at this point?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Were they not jumping up and down about first flight in 2026 just a few pages ago?
 
Are there any Good news out of IAF at this point?

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Bad news for Tejas = Good news for IAF.

I don't understand the hype on MK2 when production and induction of the current variant are facing challenges.
 
Bad news for Tejas = Good news for IAF.

I don't understand the hype on MK2 when production and induction of the current variant are facing challenges.

Insane right. Like focus on doing one thing well, be it MK1A, M2 or AMCA.

Instead they are cocking up 3 things at the same time
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top