Indian false flag and current Indo-Pak stand-off updates

[liuzhengdong]

Just remember - Ayub Khan once said Pakistan couldn’t sacrifice its people for five million Kashmiris after the 1965 war.

Similarly, in a full-scale war, China might will do indirect support to Pakistan but won’t risk its own citizens. Their strategic interests and investments can shift, but they won’t endanger their own cities for another country. Only foolish leadership would do that in the 21st century. I see China’s leadership as smart—CPEC is clear proof, they achieved what they supposed to, does not matter Pakistan achieved or not for them. They consistently make calculated moves to serve their own interests and won’t make reckless sacrifices for others.

If the Pakistan-India conflict expands to a full-scale war, the China-Pakistan defense agreement will be activated

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

An interesting Bharati analysis.....

It's obvious they're deep in cowardice, confusion and delusion. No wonder their top generals are backing off due to fear of escalation which might make them face a two-front like situation. They're opting for the Last Afgans/TTP/BLA etc. as their only line of offense....

China's sinister plan behind Pahalgam attack by Pakistan? | Iqbal Chand Malhotra​

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Meengla]

Precisely, India keeps on hoping that China will not intervene due to trade relations with India, however trade relations did not stop China from fighting India in Galwan just a few years ago.

Those like me who have been on PDF for a long time remember a time--maybe 8-10 years ago, where Indian members here would gloat about how India's trade benefits to China were too important for China to take sides in India-Pakistan conflicts. And to an extent that was true: The Chinese used to say generic things like 'why can't we all get along', basically not taking Pakistan's side in too obvious way. But, boy, it is indeed different now and for that only the 'muscular foreign policy' of Modi is to blame, much like Nehru's 'Forward' policy in the 1950s caused the historic rift with China, leading to the humiliating 1962 defeat of India. And I believe both time the Indian leadership got a little too uppity from the Western support. Fools!

Similarly, in a full-scale war, China might will do indirect support to Pakistan but won’t risk its own citizens. Their strategic interests and investments can shift, but they won’t endanger their own cities for another country. Only foolish leadership would do that in the 21st century. I

I don't know why you Indians keep bringing Chinese soldiers into this? Why would Pakistan need foreign troops when Pakistan has 240 MILLION people in Pakistan itself?? Seriously, you sound like coping.

 

[Dalit]

Jab Jung shuru ho jaye
Tab jaga dena
I am going to sleep

It is funny that even an Indian is saying this now.

 

[ety]

Those like me who have been on PDF for a long time remember a time--maybe 8-10 years ago, where Indian members here would gloat about how India's trade benefits to China were too important for China to take sides in India-Pakistan conflicts. And to an extent that was true: The Chinese used to say generic things like 'why can't we all get along', basically not taking Pakistan's side in too obvious way. But, boy, it is indeed different now and for that only the 'muscular foreign policy' of Modi is to blame, much like Nehru's 'Forward' policy in the 1950s caused the historic rift with China, leading to the humiliating 1962 defeat of India. And I believe both time the Indian leadership got a little too uppity from the Western support. Fools!

To put things in perspective, China like all big countries put national security and strategic core interests first before economic interests, Indians should have no illusion about that.

 

[Sharma Ji]

this one interesting

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[mulj]

I've said this before and I'll say it again, India would need to build dozens upon dozens of medium and large dams to even slightly decrease the water flow by only a few percentage points. That would require half a trillion dollars in construction alone. Timeline wise, it would take them the better part of 50 years to build even a portion of them.

Its simply unrealistic. The Indians simply do not have the resources, and no one will help them do it either.


I believe a huge portion goes into simply paying salaries to maintain their large numbers, another huge chunk goes towards maintenance, and the rest goes towards procurement and r&d.

With over 1 million soldiers, $90 billion is nowhere near enough.

For once you should insist on imposing your will over their, that is whole point and they gave you full advantage for it.

 

[Raj-Hindustani]

Those like me who have been on PDF for a long time remember a time--maybe 8-10 years ago, where Indian members here would gloat about how India's trade benefits to China were too important for China to take sides in India-Pakistan conflicts. And to an extent that was true: The Chinese used to say generic things like 'why can't we all get along', basically not taking Pakistan's side in too obvious way. But, boy, it is indeed different now and for that only the 'muscular foreign policy' of Modi is to blame, much like Nehru's 'Forward' policy in the 1950s caused the historic rift with China, leading to the humiliating 1962 defeat of India. And I believe both time the Indian leadership got a little too uppity from the Western support. Fools!



I don't know why you Indians keep bringing Chinese soldiers into this? Why would Pakistan need foreign troops when Pakistan has 240 MILLION people in Pakistan itself?? Seriously, you sound like coping.

Check my reply – I didn't bring up China; it's continuously being brought up by Pakistani members. My response to the same similar post, might be I am not the right person; you are asking the question.

 

[Raj-Hindustani]

If the Pakistan-India conflict expands to a full-scale war, the China-Pakistan defense agreement will be activated

Where, when and what is the defence agreement?

Never heard that – can you share the reference, or are you just happy to say it??

For an example, the Indo-Soviet Treaty of Peace, Friendship and Cooperation was signed in August 1971 between India and the Soviet Union.

This wasn’t called a “defence agreement” in a formal sense, but it included a key mutual consultation clause: if either country felt threatened by a third power, they would “immediately enter into mutual consultations” to remove that threat. It was the reason they blocked the USN Seventh Fleet and also, they threatened to the Chinese if they open the eastern front; the Soviets would be forced to open their fronts.

 

[pakistanitarzan]

Looks like India has chickened out! Kya hua Agar humare pass Rafael hote!

 

[NA71]

There is rare separate debate on a possibility that Israel may secretly send F-35 for initial strikes against Pakistan. is it possible scenario?

 

[MH.Yang]

Those like me who have been on PDF for a long time remember a time--maybe 8-10 years ago, where Indian members here would gloat about how India's trade benefits to China were too important for China to take sides in India-Pakistan conflicts. And to an extent that was true: The Chinese used to say generic things like 'why can't we all get along', basically not taking Pakistan's side in too obvious way. But, boy, it is indeed different now and for that only the 'muscular foreign policy' of Modi is to blame, much like Nehru's 'Forward' policy in the 1950s caused the historic rift with China, leading to the humiliating 1962 defeat of India. And I believe both time the Indian leadership got a little too uppity from the Western support. Fools!



I don't know why you Indians keep bringing Chinese soldiers into this? Why would Pakistan need foreign troops when Pakistan has 240 MILLION people in Pakistan itself?? Seriously, you sound like coping.

China is a country that can cut off trade with the US without hesitation. How dare Indians think that China wouldn't dare cut off trade with India? Are the people who think that way hydrocephalic?

Do Indians know how former Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji talked about China-Pakistan relations? He said, “青山松柏，永不相负.” Meaning, we are like the green hills and the pines and cypresses that will never fail each other.

 

[hembo]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Dalit]

RSS headquarter in nagpur. Nerve center of all Hindu terrorism and extremism. Couple of baburs would do. We need to bring this structure down, for shock and awe purpose.

View attachment 116026

Excellent. All such Hindutva terror structures need to be identified as potential targets.

 

[r3alist]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

India's son in law

Friends in both

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies