Indian false flag and current Indo-Pak stand-off updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
Please remember that we are here at this point because of a serious attack on civilians who were only tourists
So we have to respond
Now our expectation is that all
Our future actions will create some deterrence and prevent future attacks on our people

You may not know that but you are already losing 'deterrence' by not acting after so forcefully accused Pakistan for the Pahalgam attack and not following through with your threat. I don't see how Pakistan can be 'deterred' to launch similar attacks in future IF Pakistan was launching such attacks.

I see that indians are advocating for "strategic patience" and construction war, why is that stupid, well in 10 years all technological advantage that they now currently have in certain extent will vanish and be reversed fully into Pakistan favor which will be armed to the teeth by China and Turkiye and actually could become bully instead of defender.

Good post.
A few things are obvious as of now:
1) India didn't get the diplomatic support that it used to get; far from that.
2) Public threats of 'not one drop of water will go into Pakistan' after suspending the IWT was a hard sell diplomatically, especially when no proof was provided. A world which just witnessed similar Israeli threats against the Gazans is rightly sensitized to such rhetoric.
3) Pakistan has just now shown an desire to wage a 'do or die' war this time and many Pakistanis, including me, WANT India to start something so that there will be some strategic settlement through a conflict instead of constant blackmails India has been giving for decades.
4) India has no real friends and looking at some Indian bloggers, they know that even Bangladesh is lost for now. A huge blow to the 1971 War triumphalism; actually, a historic re-affirmation of the Two Nations Theory which was the foundation of the India Pakistan Partition of 1947.
5) Turkey and China--and maybe even Azerbaijan and some other Muslim nations like Bosnia--will help Pakistan if they are able to. The help just provided by China and Turkey and more help in the pipeline just may have prevented a war.
6) Going forward, I wish some kind of off-ramp is given to India to restore the IWT or at least not try to do something stupid to use water as weapon in future. Otherwise, however weak Pakistan maybe on economy it will make sure to match India conventionally.
 
PM MODI gives FREE HAND to the Armed forces after meeting 3 chiefs

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


They messed up the title, it should be

PM Modi gives FREE HAND JOBs to the armed forces after meeting 3 chiefs



You know, keep up morale en stuff👋
 
This is the most bizarre order ever. No objectives, no demands, just tell your armed forces they have a "Free Hand"!!!??? Most soldiers would just be like "Fine" fire a single shot over the border then go home for rest.

Modi is in fact no abdicating himself of any responsibility so he can pin blame on armed forces for lack of proper response

Sounds spot on.

Free hand is ofcourse associated with capturing land...if only we had a free hand we would
 
Residing near LOC here in Azad Kashmir.... Situation seems very calm (perhaps calm before storm) and people seem do not care at all.
Believe me we all are very fed up of India and her tactics now and in case of war whole "junta" will be out with their personal weapons and find any potential intruder to disembowell him and hung his mummy on thorny trees.

My village isn’t very far from both the LOC & IB. People are pretty chilled out & no one is bothered about any possible hostilities. Pre 1965 the LOC was a lot closer & almost everyone from the older generation was hot on the heels of Pakistan army in 1965 once the incursion into Chamb was made.
 
I don't understand why Modi Ji has given a "free hand" to the services chiefs? Why the PM of India is not making the decision himself? Given that all the meetings in India are led by the civil leadership.

Phatto nation hy basically .... chiefs bhi tutto hein ....pakistanis 5 times lesser in size, poor ecomony , bad political situation but still ...ready to take on.....knowing it would be bloody war ...but we are Allahmdolliah know how to fight with much bigger powerful enemy ......its our history .......😇
 
After one week of belligerence and imminent Indian attack, India is now trying come down the ladder; one step at a time.

After this incident, it has been established that China is the authority in South Asia and South East Asia.
 
Repeating yourself won't add any value to your bullsh!t. Pakistan would get its water anyways

It was however good to see you moving back from military option. Our thrashing of you guys in 2016 and 2019 didn't go to waste after all :)
Good you realised it, now next step try to understand repeated question gets the same answer, if you ask the same question you will get same answer, you have been repeating you will get water, I have been repeating that you will get your water, but how much and when.

Again if you have not able to comprehend about military options,I will make it simple for you, balakot happened after 12 days from the incident. This incident happened on 22nd and today is 29th, 29-22=7.

If your still did not comprehend then your must go back to school again.
 
After one week of belligerence and imminent Indian attack, India is now trying come down the ladder; one step at a time.

After this incident, it has been established that China is the authority in South Asia and South East Asia.
Please read my above post
 
Unless Pakistan adopt hard stance against terrorists families like India does then nothing will change. India burn whole villages of suspected terrorists while in Pakistan nothing happen to family members who got money because their son blew up.
As I keep saying, the current Indian leadership is hugely inspired by the Zionists and it is only commercial interests in GCC countries which prevent the Modi regime from coming out gun blazing supporting Israel.

Seriously? Is this true? It can't be.. truly madness if so.

Looks like the 56" coward has bottled it ??
Seriously - if the armed forces are "free" to select their own targets, then what is the "political objective" that the Armed forces need to achieve? What does "success" and "completion" of the mission look like ?!?!??

Looks like they all decided to climb up the hill and now that they are there, no one wants to touch this anymore and they dont know how to climb down anymore.

Going to be Devil's Advocate on this: It is possible that some kind of strikes against Pakistan are authorized within certain parameters but the operational details are left to the Services Chiefs to decide: Strike when opportunity given.
Never underestimate your enemy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top