Indian Navy News & Discussions

I am not a subject expert for cranes and their types.
But found something interesting here! @Nilgiri @Guynextdoor
Oh, you seem to have misunderstood me. I wasn't trying to compare this crane at all.

Because the news came from the internet, I am not sure whether it is true or not. My English is not good enough for me to check the information on the English web. So, I ask my Indian friends to identify the authenticity of the message. That's all.

With the working limit data of the dry dock and the gantry crane, we can roughly analyze and judge the working capacity of the dock, and thus infer its shipbuilding capacity. This includes its maximum building capacity and working efficiency.
 
Oh, you seem to have misunderstood me. I wasn't trying to compare this crane at all.

Because the news came from the internet, I am not sure whether it is true or not. My English is not good enough for me to check the information on the English web. So, I ask my Indian friends to identify the authenticity of the message. That's all.

With the working limit data of the dry dock and the gantry crane, we can roughly analyze and judge the working capacity of the dock, and thus infer its shipbuilding capacity. This includes its maximum building capacity and working efficiency.
I Am not comparing. I have very little ideas about cranes and their types. So found this news while searching for the Hyundai 600 T crane. Posted it here to get more details in laymen terms..
 
Oh, you seem to have misunderstood me. I wasn't trying to compare this crane at all.

Because the news came from the internet, I am not sure whether it is true or not. My English is not good enough for me to check the information on the English web. So, I ask my Indian friends to identify the authenticity of the message. That's all.

With the working limit data of the dry dock and the gantry crane, we can roughly analyze and judge the working capacity of the dock, and thus infer its shipbuilding capacity. This includes its maximum building capacity and working efficiency.

Many of these companies are listed and so have to report details to public since it affects their share price. I don't think there's any need to go beyond their press releases to check tonnage. capacitty etc.
 
Modern large ships are built using the segmented modular construction method. That is, the construction of a large ship is divided into many segments and modules. These segments and modules are built in different workshops or places at the same time. Finally, they are assembled in a dry dock. It maximizes efficiency and compresses the total construction time.

The data of the dry dock determines the data of the ship to be built. Its maximum size determines the maximum size of the buildable ship; its dock depth and load capacity determines the maximum tonnage of the buildable ship.

And the maximum lifting capacity of gantry crane determines its construction efficiency and maximum tonnage. It directly affects the total number of segments and modules of a large ship and the weight of each segment and module. When the weight of the module that can not be split exceeds the maximum lifting capacity of the gantry crane, it will not be able to continue to build.

Large military ships, usually use multiple main engines of smaller size. For safety consideration, they are usually arranged separately in different engine compartments. For example, the Queen Elizabeth class carriers use two MT30 gas turbines as main engines. The weight of a single engine is only 22T.
The islands of the Queen Elizabeth class carriers are built as a whole and then lifted and installed on the deck of the carrier. Of course, we can split it into smaller modules to reduce the weight, but the construction time will be longer.

Large cargo ships are much larger in tonnage, and they also usually use a more economical power scheme. They usually use a combination of one main engine and several generators. And these main engines have huge weight (e.g. RT-flex96C engine weighs 2300T). Even if you take these engines apart, its main shaft is hundreds of tons.

We know that no matter what government or business, they exaggerate their capabilities many times. This has nothing to do with China or India, in fact, it happens to all governments or businesses around the globe. If we analyze deeply based on some basic logic, we can more accurately make some predictions and judgments in advance.
 
ICG have been operating 20 odd Chetaks for over 20 years with only 1 write off

ICG have been operating 10 odd Dhruvs since 2022, this is the 3rd write off. Something nit quite right here......
 

Indian Navy skydivers crash into ocean after parachutes become entangled​


 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
View attachment 96446
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Their is a need to develop capabilities at a second shipyard for manufacturing submarines

It will take 7-8 years from deal signing for the first sub to be delivered and then 1 sub will be delivered per year for next 5 years
That's 13-14 years from deal signing till contract completion.

It would have been cheaper to order more Scorpenes We are already buying 3 additional subs as well order 6 and be done with it

India is also already paying like 300 million USD each for MLU of batch 1 Scorpenes which will add AIP and VarunAstra Torpedoes as well as DRDO Developed Hypersonic AshM currently being tested

That's a good enough capability jump which should negate any need for U214 subs
 
Their is a need to develop capabilities at a second shipyard for manufacturing submarines

It will take 7-8 years from deal signing for the first sub to be delivered and then 1 sub will be delivered per year for next 5 years
That's 13-14 years from deal signing till contract completion.

It would have been cheaper to order more Scorpenes We are already buying 3 additional subs as well order 6 and be done with it

India is also already paying like 300 million USD each for MLU of batch 1 Scorpenes which will add AIP and VarunAstra Torpedoes as well as DRDO Developed Hypersonic AshM currently being tested

That's a good enough capability jump which should negate any need for U214 subs

IN will go ahead with 2 types of SSKs (size wise)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top