ghazi52
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Thread starter
- #226
Rules reset
After years of restraint, Pakistan has carried out limited kinetic actions, which, security and diplomatic analysts say, reflects a recalibration of the “rules of engagement” after political and diplomatic efforts failed to move the Taliban.
“Pakistan’s patience has worn thin due to the Taliban regime’s persistent denial of TTP sanctuaries on Afghan soil,” says Inam. “On Oct 11, Pakistan revised its ‘rules of engagement’, declaring it would strike targets inside Afghanistan without restraint if credible evidence exists. This shift was long overdue,” he adds.
“While border skirmishes with Afghanistan have occurred in the past too — from Bajaur in the 1960s to Angoor Adda in 2008 and Tari Mangal in 1987 — this latest flare-up is different. It is no longer a localised issue, but one directly linked to the policies and protection offered by the Taliban regime,” adds Inam, who has the firsthand experience of leading the fight against terrorists on the western frontier.
After years of restraint, Pakistan has carried out limited kinetic actions, which, security and diplomatic analysts say, reflects a recalibration of the “rules of engagement” after political and diplomatic efforts failed to move the Taliban.
“Pakistan’s patience has worn thin due to the Taliban regime’s persistent denial of TTP sanctuaries on Afghan soil,” says Inam. “On Oct 11, Pakistan revised its ‘rules of engagement’, declaring it would strike targets inside Afghanistan without restraint if credible evidence exists. This shift was long overdue,” he adds.
“While border skirmishes with Afghanistan have occurred in the past too — from Bajaur in the 1960s to Angoor Adda in 2008 and Tari Mangal in 1987 — this latest flare-up is different. It is no longer a localised issue, but one directly linked to the policies and protection offered by the Taliban regime,” adds Inam, who has the firsthand experience of leading the fight against terrorists on the western frontier.









