Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[hussain0216]

Ngl that's weak in the grand scheme of things. It's not sustainable to win a war or for deterrence.

I believe Israel is going to start another campaign soon.

The problem is this, Israel indeed took a beating and it's not happy about it

BUT whilst some Israeli bases were indeed hit and they took damage and casualties

The Israeli air force is intact

They receive funding from the west so U.S, Germany, Israeli diaspora etc
So money isn't a issue

They receive weapons from the west, so even though they lost or spent a lot of weapons, they will simply be replaced through U.S and western stocks
And bombs and missiles for F35, F15 etc are easier to make and supply, especially if your just using U.S stocks

So in a relatively short amount of time, Israel would again be in a position to attack Iran

Although it has to be seen how many interceptors Israel can get because they can only be made in certain Numbers



Iran's job is much harder,
It can't get a airforce in a few months

It's missile making capabilities may have been hit as a result we don't know how many missiles Iran can make per month

Either way in the next 6 months (if it takes that long) Iran may be able to make maybe 50 missiles a month unless someone can correct me

So over the next 6 months that's 300 missiles added to the stock they already had

Iran should be able to make TELs quite easily

Iran should be able to clear the damage or blockages to entrances of blocked missile sites


But how much repair work Iran can do to it's A.D is yet to be seen


So Iran's only real plan is
Repair damage to A.D ASAP
Make TELs ASAP
Make as many missiles as possible as quick as possible
Organise it's military and prepare it's stocks
Hunt down traitors ASAP

Versus the fully restocked Israeli airforce


Iran needs to be ready and needs to plan smart and negotiations for A.D systems from Russia or China, air.planes and other support need to happen fast

 

[Persian Gulf]

Assuming they had enough ALBMs.

Anyway, I don't think the news is true. I don't think Houthis have long-range SAMs to begin with.

Houthis have Taer-2 SAM with 70km range and possibly Sayyad-2C with 75km range



plus very large numbers of missile 358 (144 in the second image below alone)






but true no 'long range' SAM system

 

[Persian Gulf]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

no evidence this happened

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

Assuming they had enough ALBMs.

Anyway, I don't think the news is true. I don't think Houthis have long-range SAMs to begin with.

They do

Houthi Air Defenses Nearly Hit U.S. F-35s and F-16s

U.S. officials speaking to The New York Times said Houthi rebels ‘nearly struck’ U.S. F-16s and an F-35 within the first 30 days of Operation Rough Rider.

theaviationist.com

 

[shapurzolaktaf]

Pezeshkian won't participate in BRICS ( just losing best opportunity to see all leaders who can help Iran)

and people wonder why we call him traitor (Zarif is trying to make the western happy)

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Araghchi went there, a strong diplomat. Pezeshkian has no political skills.

 

[the saint]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[ShapurII]

Houthis have Taer-2 SAM with 70km range and possibly Sayyad-2C with 75km range

View attachment 133571

plus very large numbers of missile 358 (144 in the second image below alone)

View attachment 133570


View attachment 133572

but true no 'long range' SAM system

Yeah, 100 km is hardly a long-range SAM system. But what radars do they have? You can't just shoot at some random voxels in the sky and deter your enemy.

They do

Houthi Air Defenses Nearly Hit U.S. F-35s and F-16s

U.S. officials speaking to The New York Times said Houthi rebels ‘nearly struck’ U.S. F-16s and an F-35 within the first 30 days of Operation Rough Rider.

theaviationist.com

I quickly checked the article but I probably overlooked where it talks about a long-range SAM. What long range system do they have?

 

[Persian Gulf]

Yeah, 100 km is hardly a long-range SAM system. But what radars do they have? You can't just shoot at some random voxels in the sky and deter your enemy.

100km is long enough to keep Israeli jets out of Yemeni airspace

they use mostly EO/IR systems but they probably have the SA-6 radar too (50km range)

Israel does not have good intelligence in Yemen hence they keep attacking the port and power stations... they tried to kill the Houthi chief of staff a few weeks ago but failed...

they used modernised SA-6 to hit Saudi F-15 in 2021 (plane continued but was likely damaged, and was likely due to pilot errors)

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[BigMela2onin]

“We condemn the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025,” leaders said in a summit statement, without naming the United States or Israel.

That's a pretty significant distinction. Aka we don't actually support you at all

 

[Arash]

He is too busy bending over for Erdogan and Aliyev!

Simply dump him, irgc should have no problem handling him...

 

[RealNapster]

If Iranian missiles had little to no effect, as Israel had claimed, then Israel would still be bombing Iran today just like we see in Palestine, Lebanon, Syria. Israelis got hit hard and backed off Op Rising Lion quickly once they saw no uprising in Iran. For the first time since 1948, Iran brought the war to Israeli streets instead of just their television screens.

Indians gave up even quicker in Op Sindoor , a 4 day war. It proves that you must be able to impose severe costs on your adversary in order to quickly end wars, otherwise they will mistreat you forever.

Iran had very limited numbers of Kheyber missiles it seems. Thats why they were firing one or two of these missiles in a salvo of 40. I believe Iran need to quickly manufacture many of these. As Israelis systems were unable to intercept these missiles and out of the. 3-4 Kheyber missiles fired, all hit targets.

I know Iran still have hundreds of older generation missiles. But if it can fire 20 Kheyber missiles in a salvo of 100 with 80 older generation ones. I don't believe Israel will be able to do much.

Also, now is the time for Iran to take help. Take satellite help from China and other sources if you got. And identify targets throughout the Israel. 100+ ready to be fired on targets. As we all witnessed in recent war that Iran had 6-7 targets only where they were striking, and occasional 1-2 missiles on other targets. While Israel targeted 100+ targets throughout Iran.

 

[Arash]

This better be fake news

How can you assist illiterate dumb inefficient talebs?????

 

[吃瓜群众]

Su35 can start flight mission from east of Iran and wit combat range f 1500 KM , go to west of Iran and do mission flight and then comeback without needing air to air refueling . It can cover entirety of Iran ...
So Su35 even with weaker avionics are better choice for Iran because lets be honest , we would know our airbase will be first targets in any war with Israel or PGCC...

If the war didn't happen and we would get first complete batch till the end of 2025, all these speculations would be baseless ...

And part of Su35 deal was paid by Iran sending drones and ammunition to Russia ...

Chinese act so high for us and it became frustrating.

What do you have to be frustrated about? We should be frustrated, we have always treated you as friends, you think we let you be your minions, shouldn't you go down the path you have chosen? The Americans and Israel want to destroy you, so why don't you let others see your bravery? And you say in good conscience that we have always supported you on the Internet, and I also support you in China's anti-aggression network every day, but why did you choose Russia and India instead of us at that time?

 

[shapurzolaktaf]

That's a pretty significant distinction. Aka we don't actually support you at all

6 July 2025, 9:45 pm
Share

Iran won the support of fellow BRICS nations meeting in Rio de Janeiro today, with the bloc condemning Israel and the US for the assault on Iran’s nuclear program and military infrastructure throughout the 12-day war last month.

“We condemn the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025,” leaders say in a summit statement, without naming the US or Israel.

“We further express serious concern over deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities,” the bloc says.


The 11-nation grouping says the strikes “constitute a violation of international law.”

The declaration is a diplomatic victory for Tehran, which received limited regional or global support over a 12-day bombing campaign by the Israeli military, which culminated in US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities at Natanz, Fordo and Isfahan.

 

[ShapurII]

What do you have to be frustrated about? We should be frustrated, we have always treated you as friends, you think we let you be your minions, shouldn't you go down the path you have chosen? The Americans and Israel want to destroy you, so why don't you let others see your bravery? And you say in good conscience that we have always supported you on the Internet, and I also support you in China's anti-aggression network every day, but why did you choose Russia and India instead of us at that time?

We have never chosen India over China. This is completely baseless and a fabrication of the Chinese. If you want to talk about the Chabahar Port, it was first offered to you. You were not interested because of the US sanctions. And China was distancing herself from Iran after 2008.

About Russia, it is unfortunate. I personally think that the Chinese are more trustable than the Russians. At least, the history of Iran-China relations is a lot more amicable compared to the history of Iran-Russia relations which has been filled with animosity and mistrust. However, certain factions inside Iran are Russian puppets, in my opinion. There is absolutely no justification for this level of closeness with the Russians.