BigMela2onin
Trusted Member
It's a shame that Iran didn't learn from Sukarno and the fate of the NAM in Cold War 1.0 that fence sitting isn't a smart idea. Even other Islamists picked a side then; it was the west, look at Zia in Pakistan. If they wanted to stand against the West, the should have sided with the East explicitly instead of crying about neither east nor west. Maybe if other major powers had a vested interest in not letting Iran be destroyed, it wouldn't be facing such a fate now. Better to be the chess player than the chess piece.The US wants regime change to implement the Syria or Libyan model. Take a look at former Yugoslavia, Serbia, or Ukraine, and you will understand. This is not about nuclear weapons; it is about competition and influence. Cold War 2.0 is unfolding, and Iran is a piece on the chessboard of the great game.
Last edited:






