Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[Par 5]

A friends latest VLOG on the matter

 

[Kyussis]

Hmmm...doesn't Iran have an active biological weapons program? If Iran does, then hypothetically, could make and use a dirty bomb?

If Iran had an active biological weapons program, wouldn't we be hearing about it in the news 24/7 like the nuclear program? Wouldn't it be included in the terms of negotiations? I am certain Iran has no such program for the same reason we don't have a Nuclear weapons program.

 

[ShapurII]

There is a poll, if we can count on it.....a lot of people say in this kind of govt, you can't have an accurate poll. Pahlavi had about 30% poll backing.....but most pros believe those numbers were skewed to bulk up his popularity...so even with the juiced numbers he only managed 1/3. The numbers are supposedly closer to 15%.........and that's mostly with the older set that were alive before the revolution.
Google GAAMAN Pahlavi poll. and then ask AI for a breakdown

AI breakdown:
Mixed Popularity: A 2022 survey showed that while 64% of Iranians viewed his father, the former Shah, positively, this does not translate directly to equivalent support for Reza Pahlavi himself. Other analyses suggest his popularity is high among certain segments, particularly monarchists, but low among reformers and liberals.
Divided Opposition: Pahlavi is seen by many in the diaspora as a prominent opposition figurehead, especially during recent protests, yet he faces criticism from within the fractured Iranian opposition for being polarizing.
Questioned Support Base: Critics argue his support is often overestimated, pointing to a lack of deep, organized support inside Iran and potential artificial inflation of his popularity via social media.
Controversial Image: His reliance on supporters often seen as far-right, his association with US/Israeli interests, and his monarchical background limit his appeal among those prioritizing national sovereignty or anti-monarchy views.

Well, 30% is actually a lot. AFD in Germany and Le Penn in France have similar support and nobody says they should not be taken seriously.

And remember that's from 2022. Back in 2022, a lot of people like me thought that the regime would change course. It was the first year of Raeesi's presidency and I thought we would finally do something about years of mismanagement by Rohani and Zarif. Hope for change and reform still existed to some extent. It was before Mahsa Amini protests became serious.

Things started to greatly change after Mahsa Amini protests. I believe Mahsa Amini protests should be seen as the turning point, like the Qom uprising in 1976 before the 1979 revolution. Remember how even the most pro-IR people on here watched Omid Dana and how he has changed now? I remember even Salar Haqq once told me that Omid Dana was doing a lot for "Iran", and by Iran, of course he meant the Islamic Republic.

The situation in Iran is extremely volatile and can change any minute. It is hard to predict what will happen in March, or even by March.

 

[ShapurII]

New anti-regime protests erupt in some universities after they are reopened.

 

[Cash gk]

Lol... what made you think that

Just like that lol

 

[Mehdipersian]

Mossadeq would not be happy with the economic concessions we will have to give them

but our survival is on the line so anything that prevents war and preserves our MRBM production is worth pursuing

I still think it has a very low chance of success, and war is inevitable.

I don't know what you think, but Iran will not back down even one step from its rights.

If they don't accept it, we will fight, and it will be a bloody war.

 

[Bharatah]

New anti-regime protests erupt in some universities after they are reopened.

it's fake news .

 

[sharreman10]

very prudent!

though, would give USA an advantage

I mean Iran don't have any choice at this point, the economy is getting worse and worse. Both a deal and war is for the nations survival.

 

[Immortals]

 

[shapurzolaktaf]

Mossadeq would not be happy with the economic concessions we will have to give them

but our survival is on the line so anything that prevents war and preserves our MRBM production is worth pursuing

I still think it has a very low chance of success, and war is inevitable.

We need foreign investments and removal of sanctions. Win-win agreement is not a problem. Meanwhile develop industry and defense to pass this sensitive and dangerous time in our history and become stronger.
However the zionists and many others are interested to prevent this outcome.

 

[tsunset]

 

[ShapurII]

Isn't that what the original photo says anyway? SA-5 Gammon is the NATO code for S-200.

 

[hussain0216]

Mossadeq would not be happy with the economic concessions we will have to give them

but our survival is on the line so anything that prevents war and preserves our MRBM production is worth pursuing

I still think it has a very low chance of success, and war is inevitable.

Another couple of years and Iran will replenish any used MRBMs, and make more, create a better A.D net, make more drones and fix some of its security issue's

If Iran can get the above then, Israel loses it's chance at hitting Iran and the Zionists will be absolutely pushing for conflict

 

[tsunset]

 

[Watandar]

The IRI is a good twitter troll lol.