dint we do the same to Afghans? unfortunately!
Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds
- Thread starter Khorasan Black Flags
- Start date
东风夜放花千树
Registered Member
U.S. oil accounts for less than 10% of the world's oil exports, and combined with Venezuelan oil and UAE oil, it still cannot monopolize the oil market.
The U.S. has tried to control Iranian and Middle Eastern oil through aggression in Iran, which would allow it to gain pricing power over oil. There is sufficient evidence that the U.S. controlled Venezuela and then announced the sale of Venezuelan oil.
Trump wants to control oil pricing and tightly link oil to the dollar. When the dollar’s ability to extract from the global economy weakens, Trump hopes to control the global economy through oil. If Trump achieves this plan, the next step would be to force other countries to use dollars to settle oil purchases. This would stabilize the huge U.S. dollar debt, lower its interest, and allow the U.S. to continue issuing massive dollar-denominated debt.
However, the U.S. cannot accomplish this plan.
Except for U.S. allied countries, no country would give up cheap energy in favor of expensive energy controlled by the U.S. Moreover, the U.S. is accustomed to attaching additional requirements in trade.
The UAE’s exit from OPEC was certainly supported by the U.S. and Israel. When the oil-dollar system existed, the U.S. could require OPEC to control production, and now the UAE should also be under U.S. control.
Therefore, I believe this viewpoint is incorrect. There are two reasons why the UAE increased production. First, the UAE’s economy has been greatly affected, and they need to increase production to sustain their economy. Second, the Epstein alliance wants the UAE to increase production to lower oil prices, reduce the funds Iran receives, and use economic pressure to force Iran to give up interests. This is what Trump is doing now.
EugeneP
Trusted Member
I think there is a difference. UAE is deporting Pakistanis of a certain sect, not all.
nope reports are they are deporting irrespective of sect.
东风夜放花千树
Registered Member
These hypocritical Western politicians make me feel nauseated. Especially the countries allied with Trump.
Choosing to ignore facts and accuse Iran is an inhumane act.
Before the Epstein coalition invaded Iran, the Strait of Hormuz was open. They condemn Iran for blocking the Strait of Hormuz, yet they do not condemn the Epstein coalition for launching an aggressive war.
They accuse Iran of attacking other countries while ignoring the fact that these countries have U.S. military bases.
Now they accuse Iran of 'holding the world hostage,' ignoring that the ones truly holding the world hostage are the United States and Israel. The U.S. is still carrying out a blockade on the Strait of Hormuz.
Is this what the West calls 'civilization'? When did human civilization become so degenerate and anti-human?
Lulldapull
Trusted Member
Abbu-G Humreeka couldn’t budge Iran after 40 days of bombarment, what can GCC do?
Iran will demolish them all in no time if this escalates.
Invading the GCC is most certainly an option on the escalatory ladder, specifically if Iran notices the GCC complicit in US aggression.
Garcia Sea
Registered Member
Iran has shown patience by failing to retaliate after its own ships were bombed and sunk. Now it has shown that it is easy prey for the US military to bomb freely, ignoring the ceasefire. Furthermore, a cargo ship was bombed and set ablaze in a southern port, but Iran has remained silent. Even when its own territory becomes the direct target of bombing, it accepts it as is.
It's game over. Under its weak leadership, Iran is surely heading down the path to becoming another Iraq.
It's game over. Under its weak leadership, Iran is surely heading down the path to becoming another Iraq.
Papa Schultz barking again ?
KingQamaR
Elite Member
It means
USN ships transiting doesn't mean the strait is open.
It means Iran recognises destroyers are maybe too hard of a target to be worth the expenditure of munitions to land a hit, when their goal is to keep commercial vessels bottled up.
USN ships transiting doesn't mean the strait is open.
It means Iran recognises destroyers are maybe too hard of a target to be worth the expenditure of munitions to land a hit, when their goal is to keep commercial vessels bottled up.
SolarWarden
Trusted Member
Really bruh?
brazensword
Registered Member
Deus Ex Machina Mankind Divided already shows Dubai in ruins
BHAN85
Trusted Member
18 minutes ago
050630 UTC MAY 26
NAVAREA IX 150/26
STRAIT OF HORMUZ
BA CHARTS 2888, 3172, OMAN CHART OM100,
OM302, OM509 AND OM1219
DECK CARGO SHIP (SIRIK) REPORTED INVOLVED IN
A SECURITY INCIDENT CAUSING FIRE IN POSITION
26-19.0N 056-20.3E (.) VESSELS TRANSITING
THROUGH THE AREA ARE ADVISED TO NAVIGATE
WITH CAUTION
hydrography.paknavy.gov.pk
050630 UTC MAY 26
NAVAREA IX 150/26
STRAIT OF HORMUZ
BA CHARTS 2888, 3172, OMAN CHART OM100,
OM302, OM509 AND OM1219
DECK CARGO SHIP (SIRIK) REPORTED INVOLVED IN
A SECURITY INCIDENT CAUSING FIRE IN POSITION
26-19.0N 056-20.3E (.) VESSELS TRANSITING
THROUGH THE AREA ARE ADVISED TO NAVIGATE
WITH CAUTION
NAVAREA IX WARNINGS – National Hydrographic Office Pakistan
BeTheme is the most advanced WordPress theme we ever did. Immerse yourself into Be|theme and explore awesome features.
hydrography.paknavy.gov.pk
