Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[mangekyo]

No I dont think its allowed. What are you referring to exactly ? A certain poster ? I have learned to put habitual offenders on my Ignore list and it helps improve my experience.

A certain poster openly said Turkish backed ISIS forces should invade Iran and terrorize its population and change its religion. Its a silly post, but its openly encouraging terrorism. I don’t want to be a part of a forum where expressing such views are allowed. It doesn’t feel right.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

No I dont think its allowed. What are you referring to exactly ? A certain poster ? I have learned to put habitual offenders on my Ignore list and it helps improve my experience.

perfect way of showing back and conveniently called it 'block list'!

you are legit, dude!

sane argumentations lays all demons (inside and out!)

 

[Watandar]

A certain poster openly said Turkish backed ISIS forces should invade Iran and terrorize its population and change its religion. Its a silly post, but its openly encouraging terrorism. I don’t want to be a part of a forum where expressing such views are allowed. It doesn’t feel right.

yeah that poster is unhinged and has been on my block list. I suggest you add him to yours and don't let him spoil your web experience. The anonymity and availability of the internet means you have to read and see all sorts of junk online.

 

[Watandar]

perfect way of showing back and conveniently called it 'block list'!

you are legit, dude!

sane argumentations lays all demons (inside and out!)

I was not referring to you, although I am concerned about the trajectory of your recent posts. But lets get back to topic.

 

[tower9]

I

If Muslims could put their sectarian nature aside and actually side with Iran, we could have all lived like kings. 70% of the worlds oil and gas belongs to Muslims and we have a population of 2B. But you couldn’t set aside your sectarian hatred and sided with the Zionists. I hope you are proud of yourselves.

Enjoy living in humiliation under ottoman NATO rule.

It’s Irans fault that it was stupid enough to think it could win the backing of the Arabs.

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

I was not referring to you, although I am concerned about the trajectory of your recent posts. But lets get back to topic.

you are concerned about my posts!

dude, get a life!

 

[Persian Gulf]

genuine question: Open support of terrorism and encouraging acts of terror is allowed on this forum? I need to know because no fuckin way if I am going to participate in a forum where this is allowed! Please clarify. Simply thread banning or deleting posts aren’t enough

@Persian Gulf

obviously not allowed. did you report the offending posts?

 

[Persian Gulf]

Iran is useful to keep the other side of the Arabian Gulf united against it and within the US camp, so defeating it completely serves no useful purpose, as long as it remains contained without instigating proxies elsewhere.

you will use the correct historical name of the Persian Gulf in this section

thanks

 

[Persian Gulf]

A certain poster openly said Turkish backed ISIS forces should invade Iran and terrorize its population and change its religion. Its a silly post, but its openly encouraging terrorism. I don’t want to be a part of a forum where expressing such views are allowed. It doesn’t feel right.

that user is now banned from this thread

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

I suspect, this announcement has something to do with peace force or Greenland.
Certainly not about IR

or
it could be about Ukraine

 

[tsunset]

I suspect, this announcement has something to do with peace force or Greenland.
Certainly not about IR

or
it could be about Ukraine

Its untrue and his post dates from March 2025, not today

 

[Persian Gulf]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

first tweet is fake, please be more careful

 

[kastor ville]

There are plenty of analysts--both Westerners and Iranians--who say that Iran still holds a large lethal missile and/or regionally disruptive capabilities and I believe that's the only reason that Iran has not been attacked yet.

But Netanyahu, as long as Trump is the President, will keep probing options to attack Iran but he has yet to find a 100% compliant American President. It is very important to note that before the 2024 elections, the VP Candidate J.D. Vance was strongly opposed to attacking Iran but since becoming the VP, he has been quiet, just as expected of the VPs. But I also think there was/is a strong Muslim countries push back on attacking Iran, mostly for their own interests, and Trump cannot ignore them. In Trump's 'bottomline', despite all his love for Israel, there is net gain of $ from the Islamic countries vs a parasite like Israel, useful as Israel maybe in some ways. Noticed how he expressed his real thoughts about 'Bibi' shooting down Iranian missiles in Davos.

In short, while Netanyahu has his best historically possible American President in office right now, there are regional constraints imposed on America and by extension on Netanyahu.

Truth...Nicely said, greed.

 

[kastor ville]

If i am iranian leader in response i would only target zio colony as they are attacked on their behalf anyway, i see it as most reasonable option as it will least enrage world wide public even as much as it seems strange.
Punching some bases in gulf do not have particular value beside destroying radars so limited punches on them should be considered also.
But knowing so far how iranians work they will make calculated counter attack and be by default in inferior position because of it.
That is easier part of the war for them, harder one will be to maintain cohesion of armed forces and rockets units and if war goes in long term air raids ability to sustain war time economy and military production. Also they should send message if their any oil facility targeted that equates closing of gulf straits and targeting oil infrastructure in region wherever usa has stakeholds.

Exactly....hitting empty US bases don't mean jack, except giving ammo to the war hawks in DC. If they attack we should concentrate on 2 things Israel and oil tankers.

 

[VCheng]

you will use the correct historical name of the Persian Gulf in this section

thanks

Thank you for such timely augmentation of my previous comment as explained fuhrther below, now suitably amended in view of your authoritative demand:

Iran is useful to keep the other side of the same historical body of water united against it and within the US camp, so defeating it completely serves no useful purpose, as long as it remains contained without instigating proxies elsewhere.

As if anyone needs more reminders of just how impossible it remains for Persia and Arabia to be able to face any outside enemies in a joint manner.

Maintaining such acrimony just makes it easier for the enemies of both to divide and conquer.

Obviously, there is no need to occupy Iran when it remains so useful, while its economic strength withers away to almost nothing, helping to keep its influence contained but ominous.

In my view, that is the real danger, not nomenclature, but I suppose to many it might be the other way around.