Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes! They undoubtedly did.
But they could have done more.
If they weren’t ready to do more - they should have bid their time instead of giving the Zionists an excuse.
They should have followed the China strategy of patience - over Taiwan.
Can,you share some more info to support this claim? This looks easy to say but we need more insights to agree with this odd allegation.Because Khamenei preferred to prioritize Russia and Arab militias over Iran's national security.
Only for US to need to have to bomb it with its entire military on a 2nd try? And Mind you , Iran's leu and heu are still safe, plus iran needs a nuclear infrastructure to have secure nuclear technology amd resources- dont ignore Iran's actual practical nuclear needs.He wasted 35 years of Iran's resources on a nuclear program that eventually ended up bombed by the US.
So how will US control things on the ground in Iran after bombingThere will be no gorilla warfare because first of all, the US is not planning to invade Iran on the ground
Maybeand secondly, Iranians will not unite in support of the current regime. If any sort of warfare takes place, it will be civil war.
Yltransition from what to what exactly? Just like in Iraq and Afghanistan , the eventual leader of Iran wont be pro US.In fact, the US is most likely counting on a planned transition of power in Iran.
are we talking about Iraq under saddams control or anything relevant for the past 40 years that Iraqs territory was used to launch attacks on IranLets see, I've seen a lot of incompetence and negligence.
Ironically Iraq("Resistance country") has been used to attack Iran, more than any other country.
are we talking about Iraq under saddams control or anything relevant for the past 40 years that Iraqs territory was used to launch attacks on Iran
Thank you for your efforts.did you report any posts?
I am the only moderator here, I can't watch the thread 24/7
if you want to help then report the posts and they will be dealt with
To be fair iraqs government isn’t part of the actual resistance are the Iraqi groups going to go to war over a small amount of troops in Iraq that aren’t threatening them sorry same could be said about a few hundred idf in Syria is Syrias army going to go to war to kick out a few hundred troops that have taken territory past the golan heights line I don’t think that’s happening any time soon.I'm talking about currently. The biggest militant group with the most amount of fighters and resources are the PJAK and other Kurdish militant groups, all are based out of Iraq and use Iraq to set up operations.
The Israelis and the US have a base in the KRG, and until recently in Al Asad airbase.
The largest amounts of infiltrations happen on the Iraqi border.
Iraqi airspace gets used to launch standoff missiles into Iran. Iraqi airspace gets used to launch drone attacks into Iran.
A "Pro Resistance" government failed to purchase air defense failed to purchase Fighter jets to guard its airspace, a "pro resistance" government has thus far failed to expel the US, A "pro resistance" government gave the US control over its airspace. Sulaimani was killed in Iran under "Pro Resistance" govt with a drone flying and hovering over Iraqi airspace.
Now, this a model discourse.....I need to learn how to debate like you, brother. This is the way............I could never by default and let me disengage from discussion, also thank you for your time and effort trying to clarify your positions for me, although i disagree with lot of it i appreciate courtesy.
I'm talking about currently. The biggest militant group with the most amount of fighters and resources are the PJAK and other Kurdish militant groups, all are based out of Iraq and use Iraq to set up operations.
The Israelis and the US have a base in the KRG, and until recently in Al Asad airbase.
The largest amounts of infiltrations happen on the Iraqi border.
Iraq expects to receive the medium-range KM-SAM air defence missile systems it ordered from South Korea by early 2026. At the same time, Baghdad has asserted it won’t allow Israel to use Iraqi airspace to bomb Iran again.
Iraq’s military announced in September that it would introduce the KM-SAM into service early next year. That acquisition will mark a substantial upgrade of Iraq’s existing short and medium-range American-made AN/TWQ-1 Avenger and Russian-made Pantsir-S1 systems.
Shortly after that announcement, Iraqi National Security Advisor Qasim al-Araji declared that Baghdad would ensure Israel doesn’t use Iraqi airspace in another air war against Iran.
Israeli warplanes repeatedly passed through Iraqi airspace during the June 12-day war. On 20 June, Iraq complained to the UN that 50 Israeli jets had violated its airspace earlier that day.
If another Israel-Iran war breaks out after Iraq acquires KM-SAMs, Baghdad would theoretically have a much greater capability against Israeli aircraft operating in Iraqi airspace.
“Iran has spared Iraq from the conflict with Israel, as Iraq’s oil-dependent economy is currently the only sanctions-free source of funds and trade for Tehran,” he said. “The protection of this precious but vulnerable economic infrastructure in Iraq is at the forefront of Iran’s policy to avoid a conflict with Israel.”
With or without Baghdad’s approval, PMF militias could easily be ordered to join the Houthis, Hezbollah, and the IRGC, and the Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani could do virtually nothing to stop it, according to Sagnic.
This policy is “best reflected” in the recent release of Elizabeth Tsurkov, the Israeli hostage held by the Iran-backed Kataib Hezbollah in Iraq.
“In short, the central Iraqi government would undoubtedly want to avoid a conflict with Israel,” he said. “But the decision to do so was made in Tehran, not Baghdad.”
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.