Baluch armed groups? 10 dudes in front of a camera with AK-47s? Baluchistan groups are no where near large enough in size.
And I’m an Iranian Kurd. Kurdistan isn’t going to rise up like you think, they didn’t even when Saddam invaded. Iranian Kurdistan is very different than Iraqi and Syrian Kurdistan.
Jundullah has had deadly clashes with Iranian forces in the past. And it took hours and days to suppress them even in small numbers. They have recruited 2,000 soldiers. Now imagine they also have the backing of the US. They won't be able to invade cities, but they will surely cause trouble, particularly if Baluch people join them too.
I remember you said you were Turkic, but I guess you're Kurdish-Turkic, probably from a place like Hamedan or nearby areas. Anyway, Kurdistan is not going to rise up, Kurdish separatist groups are. They have been preparing for this situation for decades.
Unarmed and untrained protestors? The ones that were armed had pistols and shotguns.
You want a revolution so bad you aren’t even looking at this rationally. It’s clouding your thinking.
I remember you guys were quite fond of reminding us about that Pompeo's tweet that said Mossad agents were among the protestors. So, what makes you think that there are no trained agents among the protestors to lead them? You don't need a million trained protestors, just enough leaders to lead them.
Unarmed does not matter when your anti-riot forces and the police have been bombed by the US. When people start to feel that the regime is too weak to stop them, more and more people will have the courage to come to the streets.
My first preferred option is not a revolution, but a soft transition of power like a coup within the system, handing it over to people with ideas that fit our today's society. Sort of like what Bin Salman did in Saudi Arabia, with a 180 degree turn in our foreign policies. If it is impossible, then my second choice is a revolution.