Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Sounds like Iran is offering 2015 JCPOA + economic investment contracts and Trump wants total capitulation.

Barring a breakthru tonite, I think Iran is on borrowed time. Persian New Year a few weeks a way, perfect time to start a war as large parts of society are shut down and traveling.
 
Hossein Amir-Abdollahian was very competent and big loss for Iran.

That dude was a bigger idiot. Him and Raisi let the AoR get decapitated and just sat and gave meaningless red lines as Israel destroyed HZ, Assad, and Hamas.

Iran hasn’t had a competent FM in decades. Not a competent president.

The only competent Iranian official was Solemani and his thirst for martyrdom got him killed. The man should never have left Iran. Look at Ghaani, he rarely travels abroad.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Sounds like Iran is offering 2015 JCPOA + economic investment contracts and Trump wants total capitulation.

Barring a breakthru tonite, I think Iran is on borrowed time. Persian New Year a few weeks a way, perfect time to start a war as large parts of society are shut down and traveling.


well, Trump want to take what other achieve with total war and invading others only by threats ....
 
Nuclear weapons are allowed in Islam. Why do they think they are not ?? ( Same bunch of people who can't agree on which day we start and stop Ramadan ?? )
So yeah iI agree with your above post and disagree I don’t agree with nuclear weapons but also agree without them anyone of these countries can be brought to it’s knees for fear of others with nuclear weapons.

It’s definitely stupid to actually use them but if everyone has something to lose in the face of nuclear war no one sane will actually use it
 
Also the GCC could've achieved the same result without the need to be a vassal to the enemies of Islam, but because they're not a natural rule, and they're paranoid, they needed to sell their soul to be able to get protection from the US. This is why educated Muslims hate them....not for their success, but because they're sell outs and corrupt rulers. On tv they don't drink and they go to Mecca....but behind the scenes they appear in the Epstein files.
I doubt GCC would achieve the same success if they weren't vassals. The U.S policy for the Middle Eastern is that you either provide value and comply to American policies, or you get removed. If they can't remove you, you get sanctioned and weakened.
 
Negotiations

Iran :
I offer general peace and will buy American goods and planes, worth many billions to create jobs
Need sanctions off , I need to develop Nuclear Energy for my people and grow my economy

Zionist :
If I don't steal it , someone else will
I will build a casino , I will build nice road and beaches , Prime Resort
If you don't accept my term , I will use American people and their resources to do dirty work for Zionist.

[Opinion of American Podcaster/Journalist]
As Tucker Carlson, highlighted in his interview with the Zionist Pig
The Zionist can use all money of American people their resources because that is what they believe in


If it was a normal American person they would like say why are our ships all the way in Middle east instead for protecting local shores. Has Iran sent any war ship to our Land in past 50 years?
 
Last edited:
I don't think it is Iranian diplomat style to post on twitter they have a proper News Agency for formal statements
 
Nuclear weapons are allowed in Islam. Why do they think they are not ?? ( Same bunch of people who can't agree on which day we start and stop Ramadan ?? )

The idea is a sword or a spear etc you have autonomy over the weapon

So as a Muslim you make the choice to only target your enemy in battle, which doesn't include women and children or the innocent for example


A nuclear weapon does not distinguish
If you drop it on a enemy city, you kill every man, every woman, every child, every dog, cat, bird, fish etc etc etc etc


And unlike collateral damage, where you intend to target a enemy and accidentally kill people in the vicinity

You know right from the beginning a nuclear weapon will kill innocents



Now we can discuss the validity of the above for ages,, but that's the thinking IR is using
Frankly they are RIGHT and they are logical
But the problem is right and logical won't protect you from scum bags like the Jews and Americans and if the choice is their women and children dying or your women and children dying then I would pick theirs

And that's why Pakistan has nuclear weapons, because we would rather fry the fcuk out of the Hindus or any other enemy then sit here and let them kill us
 
Savage Orc quoting Axios: "Talks in Geneva were positive"
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Iran is gaining time. taking leaf from Battle of Trench, they have amassed forces outside the border.and wait yes Amr ibn Abd al-Wud will cross but in greater scheme of things. Iranians will prevail and amassed forces will tire out, and they will start to have doubts and disagreement.

all Iran needs to do is bunker down and ride it out this extreme tension time.

as matter of fact i remember Sardar interview while explaining 2006 battle he refer to this tactic suggested by Supreme leader.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top