ResurgentIran2
Registered Member
No, this is not correct.
Even though Iran’s territorial waters cover a large part of the Strait of Hormuz, international law specifically prevents it from exercising full control over navigation in that strait.
Same applies for all international straits. From Suez to Bosporus to Malakka - the transit of passage can't be obstructed by nearby coastal countries.
Türkiye hasn't signed it either, yet, customary international law does exist and it is binding.
There is no reason to halt civil maritime traffic while the IRGC continues to damage the energy infrastructure of the GCC. Given that Israel has chosen to attack Iran's essential infrastructure to create a failed state anyways, Tehran has no longer any motivation to officially close the strait and be the official boogeyman in this conflict.
Generating a global energy price shock is Iran's main objective. Why accept the international blame without anything in return if you must strike Arab oil facilities anyway due to the assault on your critical infrastructure by Israel and the US?
Please dispense with the nonsense.
The US war against Iran was vehemently against international law, yet that didnt stop them from doing it. There was no UNSC vote. Hell, it was even against US constitutional law.
The UN "system" (if it ever truly existed) did nothing to halt US illegal actions.
International law is not really a thing. Its now law of the jungle, and Iran is simply playing their game.









