Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[Bengal71]

2. A country can only get a nuclear weapon if at least one of the 5 permanent UN Security council countries allow it!

Where is this rule written? You are making stuff up and building the rest of your points on the made up stuff.

 

[Persian Gulf]

GBU-39 recovered intact

 

[Oracle]

Just curious... What if Trump is not bluffing and end up using Nuke?
What could be Iran reaction?
What would be world's reaction?
What will be the consequences for middle East?
What will be effects of it on South East Asia?
Suppose Trump went insanely wild....

Iran can't do anything.
Nuclear on ground or inside ground will have less destruction on air but under ground bases will be destroyed completely.


If they will hit they will not detonate in air but with missile striking inside mountains

 

[Immortals]

As you can see the Larijani clan has always wanted to be in bed with the Americans.

@Emirzad
@Persian Gulf
@ShapurII

 

[Persian Gulf]

 

[MNZGamerX]

 

[ShapurII]

As you can see the Larijani clan has always wanted to be in bed with the Americans.

@Emirzad
@Persian Gulf
@ShapurII

We are on thin ice. We may very well get nuked in this war. Maybe he knows something we don't.

On a side note, this mother f*cker is the man behind the theory of "Umm al-Qura" in the Islamic Republic. His stupid theory has been the basis of Iran's foreign policy for decades.

 

[Oldenwisdom...قول بزرگ]

After this statement. I think Pakistan should wipe its hands clean from any efforts on mediation. As the clown is hell bent on sabotaging any engagement after initiating an illegal war.

This statement collapses in essence the post second world war concensus and all states should immediately retrench for what they can get out until a new concensus is established. And let America figure out if they'll keep lunatic pedos run their affairs. Any adults in the room should take his phone and slap him around to the nearest nursing home around LeDroit park!
End this now!

 

[Bengal71]

It seems like the bombing of railways has started.

Bombing railways is quite stupid and waste of precious munitions. Railways are cheap and quick to repair.

 

[Anahita]

Just curious... What if Trump is not bluffing and end up using Nuke?
What could be Iran reaction?
What would be world's reaction?
What will be the consequences for middle East?
What will be effects of it on South East Asia?
Suppose Trump went insanely wild....

United States, China, India, and Russia will never use nuclear weapons. These countries maintain a no-first-use stance simply because their conventional military capabilities are strong enough to protect their interests both within and beyond their borders.

Moreover, using nuclear weapons would defeat the very purpose of conflict—how can a country capture, control, or exploit resources if it has already destroyed them through nuclear strikes?

In fact, even if Iran possessed nuclear weapons, it is unlikely that it would use them in response to a conventional war, given the catastrophic consequences and limited strategic value of such a decision.

 

[Kyussis]

More intelligent convos than what I found here...

Good. Keep talking to your self instead of spreading your crap here!

 

[ShapurII]

Bombing railways is quite stupid and waste of precious munitions. Railways are cheap and quick to repair.

Some of these railways are in fact railway bridges. Not so quick to repair.

 

[BigMela2onin]

United States, China, India, and Russia will never use nuclear weapons. These countries maintain a no-first-use stance simply because their conventional military capabilities are strong enough to protect their interests both within and beyond their borders.

Moreover, using nuclear weapons would defeat the very purpose of conflict—how can a country capture, control, or exploit resources if it has already destroyed them through nuclear strikes?

In fact, even if Iran possessed nuclear weapons, it is unlikely that it would use them in response to a conventional war, given the catastrophic consequences and limited strategic value of such a decision.

Afaik US does have first use policy

 

[Blain2]

Members of Congress in both US parties are sold out to the Zionists. They are quietly letting this pan out thus no serious opposition to Trump's bullying rhetoric (I do not think the nuclear strikes are on the table), however I just heard on Al-Jazeera that Israeli PM and government are pushing the US to consider the nuclear option because their calculations do not pander to whatever happens to Iran/Iranian people. They are looking at is as an existential war for Israel.

That aside, what is stupidly insane and hilarious in an obscene way, is that the fundamentals of the NPT treaty, which Iran has signed, are that any country that becomes its signatory is automatically guaranteed protection from a nuclear state - this is guaranteed by the P5 on the Security Council. The threats to Iran fly in the face of the entire NPT regime because the ones threatening not only include a P5 state, but also two established nuclear powers threatening a non-nuclear state.

What does it mean for NPT? It essentially means the NPT is finished. The race to nuclear weapons will accelerate in the coming years.

 

[Bengal71]

Some of these railways are in fact railway bridges. Not so quick to repair.

yeah, those will take time. Rail tracks on the ground are cheap and quick to repair.