Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How much "military force" exactly, what do you know exactly to be true and what is its purpose?What exactly is not clear? You’re sending millitary forces to a country that is participating in a war against us. This is while we are your guests. Obviously I am not going it celebrate it.
How does that change anything?I explained clearly how it is inaccurate.
In your analogy, would Iran also be hosting a peace summit for the belligerent parties?
There is plenty of context missing from your statements.
As i wrote brother, we have our own compulsions. This is the fruit of our criminal negligence to strengthen our economy which we continue to reap.I’m not convinced you would. But if true, you’re at least being consistent. I would never support such a move from Iran btw. Guess we’re just different
Only JD is serious, Kushner and Witkoff are non serious . Talks may fail or JD adopt neutral posture. Trump already fired 8 top Generals who are against this war.My hunch is that the talks will fail (80%) unless the US get something big out of it. JD Vance wouldn't want to look weak, or he can't be in a presidential race. Also, as Iran is losing, so the US cannot accept its all or most of its points. If Iran open the Strait, the US will ask more anyway, which would fail the negotiation. So, nobody will back down first.
Therefore, the talks will stall first, some point will be renegotiated, and then it will be successful. Trump cannot gamble this anymore. He wants to look successful in the upcoming visit to China, in front of MAGA and the NATO.
What exactly is not clear? You’re sending millitary forces to a country that is participating in a war against us. This is while we are your guests. Obviously I am not going it celebrate it.
This seems significant
In your analogy, Iran sends SAMs to protect Delhi. You have equated this to Pakistan's deployment in KSA. But the analogy neglects to include the mediation effort being made in Iranian interests.How does that change anything?
If you read my first post, I was replying toHow much "military force" exactly, what do you know exactly to be true and what is its purpose?
You don't know what you are upset about, yet remain persistent in this specific detail, out of everything else going on
You are foolish if you cannot see that those who wish bad for Iran are trying to exaggerate and sensationalize the Pakistan Saudi defence agreement, and it seems to be working
So if you cannot determine what might just be normal type of events but want to translate it into something to be offended about this is on you
No. I said India attacks Pakistan through UAE bases, and Iran arms UAE with hypersonics.In your analogy, Iran sends SAMs to protect Delhi. You have equated this to Pakistan's deployment in KSA. But the analogy neglects to include the mediation effort being made in Iranian interests.
Do you actually think Islamabad would be angry at a nation that sought to genuinely resolve a war between Pakistan and India while preserving Pakistani interests?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.