Kyussis
Trusted Member
What was holding Chump back the first 4 weeks of his 4 day war?Careful there or Orangeman may say, oh yeah hold my beer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What was holding Chump back the first 4 weeks of his 4 day war?Careful there or Orangeman may say, oh yeah hold my beer.
Your nuclear weapons did not deter nuclear india from launching operations sindoor last year.
Also, this is probably the first war where the US's airforce has underperformed in helping US achieve its military goals- US and israel bombedsemi intensely for 40 days, and with no ground support to compliment the airstrikes, the US opted for a ceasefire, which it unilaterally extended,and then replaced resuming aerial bombing of
with a blockade- NOT GOOD results from primary reliance on airforce to fight the war.
If and when US loses this war, many countries with large, heavily-invested airforce will have serious doubts about heir effecitveness, no wonder the Arabs(and toothless nato) didnt activate their 100s of fighter jets against iran- if US couldn't use it's airforce effectively, how could they?
He might finally use that kill switch to turn off Iran altogether…..also supposedly our clown in chief doesn’t partake in alcohol just likes fat greasy food as we can all tellWhat was holding Chump back the first 4 weeks of his 4 day war?
What ever memes you make..doesnt change facts .
lol…..more like trumps hollow blockade was just talk.Seems like Iran has secretly or subtly let US know that any complete blockade of its oil shipments via soh would mean return to war
Vietnam took a decade, as did Iraq or Syria. Afghanistan took 2 decades.What was holding Chump back the first 4 weeks of his 4 day war?
The complete absence of nuance in these people is mildly amusing.
“For 47 years, Pakistan has aided the IRGC.” Does this baby-faced twink know that Pakistan’s relationship with the IRGC and the broader Islamic Republic has ebbed and flowed—from mild belligerence to a lukewarm, reluctant embrace? Even accounting for the current, nascent improvement in relations, there’s an argument to be made that they still have not reached the level of our ties under the Shah, who actually helped us in our 1965 and 1971 wars with India.
We have also occasionally had to bear the brunt of the export of Iran’s sectarian conflicts. If Pakistan were the foremost backer of Iran right now, we wouldn’t be this gucci(comfortable) with the United States and the GCC (barring the Emiratis, of course, who are a unique specimen unto themselves).
I also recall a conversation with a Pahlavist on this forum before this war began who was similarly obsessed with Pakistan. Not taking any names, as I’m not interested in getting into a “tu-tu main-main” contest, there are already too many of those going on here already.
US not being able to effectively destroy and dismantle Iran's military operations and infrastructure this year is the biggest blunder the US has made in its Iran policy since 1979. I will guess amd say that anybody who doubts this believes in "white is right" logic.
Too violent. Much better to keep existing blockade and hope IRGC runs out of cash. Bankruptcy is much preferable to bombs. Iranian money has six zeroes now. When it reaches twelve or fifteen zeroes, an agreement will be reached.As I have said, the only options left to accomplish Netanyahu's goals are to carpet bomb Iran with heavy bombers a la Dresden style (not even enough missiles are available) or to drop multiple nukes on Iran. The first is an option with many risks because during the so-called rescue of the American pilot, multiple American aircrafts were lost. Latter one, the nuking, is an option but not really because neither the American or the Israeli existence is at stake.
However I slice and dice, Iran has the upper hand in this conflict, at least as of now.
Sounds like Iran might decide to go nuclear. In my opinion, this is just posturing for negotiations. Both sides are waiting for the other to blink first.
Oh come on!! Just because US attacked Iran twice under the pretense of negotiations doesn't mean it's going to happen again. You can trust the US this time to not attack Iran because US has said pinky swear and when US pinky swears the word is bond.Iran was already attacked twice while they were negotiating on the nuclear issue with the US.
Iran knows they can never satisfy Satanyahu's demands since he seems to be the man who has the final say on which directions the talks would go visavis the HEU and the missile program. So it seems from Mojtaba's and IRGC's point of view, there is nothing to talk about in these 2 areas.
Iran is under a new leadership - a man who is reportedly had enough of the endless negotiations. We're talking about a leader whose immediate family was martyred in the recent unprovoked attack on Iran. So, if circumstances permit, he would do anything in his power to speed things up!

We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.