Meengla
Elite Member
Sounds like US + UAE attacked Iran.
UAE didn’t have the balls to attack Iran without its master alongside them.
I should have known something was coming up because Netanyahu spoke with Trump within last 24 hours.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sounds like US + UAE attacked Iran.
UAE didn’t have the balls to attack Iran without its master alongside them.
they didn't fire that many missiles at them to try not to hit themLike it or not you are in a ceasefire. There is 0% chance Iran tries to sink a U.S. warship during a ceasefire. Not going to happen. U.S. also knows this that’s why ships are much closer than during the war.
whatever helps you lolI can easily contradict your post but it will go off topic. Btw you're still wrong.
I don't know if CIWS were used but I do know that with an E-2D flying (which they likely had) Burkes can shoot down cruise missiles way beyond line of sight.When using a Close-In Weapon System (CIWS), such as the US Navy's Phalanx, the "danger" zone is extremely close—typically within 1 mile (1,600 meters) or less from the ship. CIWS is designed as a last-ditch defense against incoming missiles, meaning it engages when threats have already bypassed long-range defenses.

Iran has responded. It does now seem that the USN attack on an Iranian civilian vessel was responded to by an IRGC attack against USN ships. Mainstream media seems to be echoing the twitter claims in earnest. I don't know why some Iranians are so jittery and seem to think their forces won't respond to aggression.
US and its gCC allies also made claims of 100% interception during 40 days clash only to be badly ridiculed by their wsj, cnn and cbs about the severe damages their 18 bases took, they are almost inoperable with close to 250 structures completely gone including radars, sams etc... Sat images provided the proofs, sadly in naval clashes we wont have sat images and believing Centcom statements alone is a joke...
Events: the US attacked an Iranian oil tanker (Iranian claim), so 3 US destroyers were attacked by Iranian missiles and drones as they exited the Strait of Hormoz (US claim).
The US intercepted all the targets and responded by hitting Iranian missile/drone launch sites, C&C and ISR targets in Bandar Abbas and Qeshm Island (US claim). US insists these were self defence strikes and not a resumption of the war.
--
the fact three US destroyers were able to pass so close to Iran without getting hit once is not good news. we knew Iranian subsonic cruise missiles were outdated and not good enough to hit modern US ships. so much larger numbers of missiles are needed in successive waves to achieve any hits.
Pakistan is trump's offramp mechanism/route , and Pakistan is ok with that, as long as Trump pays Pakistan back "fairly" for the emergency favor given. Nothing is free.The US and Israel failed to achieve any of their stated objectives and the US is looking for a face saving exit. Trump may bark loudly every day, that's all he knows, but he has not attacked again. I think Iran is close to victory and will be allowed to sell its oil to the world very soon.
Respect or acknowledge?I respect your viewpoints.
yes, the drones and ASCMs have a negligible chance of impacting and are almost useless other than to harass the US shipsThe ineffectiveness of Iranian anti ship missiles against the USN is now becoming a serious issue for Iran.
The uncertainty of investment returns on oil pipelines can prevent pipeline construction.The Ed. in Chief of 'The Economist' said it would take only 4-5 years to bypass the Strait of Hormuz for oil/gas by building pipelines. But she forgot to note that those too would be susceptible to the Iranian drones and missiles AND much else critical stuff flows through the Strait then just the fossil fuel.
Well Vietnam was fought for the wrong reasons and America left battered and bruised they didn’t leave with their heads up high not knocking the soldiers who I believe most went theirI can easily contradict your post but it will go off topic. Btw you're still wrong.
i think people kind of a short term memory sometimes they said the same thing about Iranian attacks on bases throughout the Middle East or Hezbollah against Israel first couple of waves were blunted but as the days went by the missiles and drones got through difference with a naval ship only takes several waves before they connect can’t keep firing indefinitely or reloading their interceptors between multiple waves no matter what ship it is Russians may not be on the same league as the American navy anymore but whatever the Ukrainians could do the Iranians can do better in my eyes from USV to UAV to whatever missiles Iran has its disposalyes, the drones and ASCMs have a negligible chance of impacting and are almost useless other than to harass the US ships
the solution is saturation. the ship's limited defences will be depleted and one will get through, and you only need one.
or a more advanced attack involving multiple attack vectors and attacking from below (torpedos), the surface (UUVs), and above (ASBMs) simultaneously
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.