Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Speaking to Al Mayadeen, Saeid Ajorloo, a member of the media team close to the Iranian negotiating delegation, said that the US-Iran agreement includes a clause that would allow Iran’s withdrawal if the Americans renege on returning $14 billion of its frozen assets.

He highlighted that so far, the Iranian side has not approved the Memorandum of Understanding and has not informed the Pakistani mediator of an approval.

Ajorloo noted that if the Americans violate any of the terms of the understanding, Iran will revert to its current measures in the Strait of Hormuz.




Suffice to say that some just simply don't understand how strategic the control of Hormuz really is for Iran. It has tremendous security implications... detrimental to the state!
Let go now and forever lose the claim.
 
It seems vessels are no longer scared of IRGC and the strait is becoming a tad more leaky as vessels get sneak out when IRGC is not paying attention.

This is what happens when you fail to upload deterrence.

In my oppinion US is using civilian ships to force the blockade. They're dealing but in reality they're testing and learning how works the kinetic measures of IRGC to force blockade.

If US continues in such way a DDG may be hit. Irán would have no more option than escalate the ladder hitting a warship.
 
Suffice to say that some just simply don't understand how strategic the control of Hormuz really is for Iran. It has tremendous security implications... detrimental to the state!
Let go now and forever lose the claim.

Hormuz is indeed of strategic importance and it would be huge achievement for the side that wins control over it. 100% agreed.
 
NO TO ABHRAHAM ACCORDS PERIOD...
BY ALL MEANS RE START THE WAR....
BUT PAKISTAN WILL BE NEVER EVER BE IN SAME LEAGUE WHERE FILTHY UAE PIGLETS ARE PART OF... ...
SO BASICALLY ILLEGAL ENTITY UAE AND BAHRIN CAN GO FCK THEMSELVES...
TIT FOR TAT....
Mount hermon I wonder if PAF can take a pic or two of it...
MAKE SYRIA MELTING BLAZING VOLCANIC ASH FOR ISRAEL....THATS THE FCKING RESPONSE
 
What you did not realize is that the question posed was not about political beliefs, but rather economic well-being:

Do Iranians feel that having a nuclear weapon will improve their economic well-being?
Im pretty sure North Korea would have good economic well being thanks to China if they weren't a communist dictatorship. So it's not the nukes that's causing NK issues but rather the establishment in charge. That's why your question is a bit of a non-sequitur.
 
Im pretty sure North Korea would have good economic well being thanks to China if they weren't a communist dictatorship. So it's not the nukes that's causing NK issues but rather the establishment in charge. That's why your question is a bit of a non-sequitur.

What is a non sequitur here, if any, it is comparing different countries, as the question I asked is one that every country must answer for itself, given its own unique geopolitical situation.

By all means, if it is decided that such technology is of great benefit, then any country is entitled to acquire nuclear weapons equally, being fully aware of all the costs associated with such a decision. After all, it is the people who must pay the price for such consequential decisions.
 
What is a non sequitur here, if any, it is comparing different countries, as the question I asked is one that every country must answer for itself, given its own unique geopolitical situation.

By all means, if it is decided that such technology is of great benefit, then any country is entitled to acquire nuclear weapons equally, being fully aware of all the costs associated with such a decision. After all, it is the people who must pay the price for such consequential decisions.

So by comparing Iran and North Korea, like you just did, would constitute a non-sequitur? I agree!

What is for certain is that countries won't just come in an invade you that easily if you have nukes. That means Iran can have sound economic relations with like minded nations as well as sound distribution of wealth, as well as have nukes.
 
Does anyone else feel like maybe Trump wants the strait closed, so the US can renegotiate LNG contracts and also enrich himself and his family by manipulating the market?
 
Does anyone else feel like maybe Trump wants the strait closed, so the US can renegotiate LNG contracts and also enrich himself and his family by manipulating the market?
American Jewish elite wants everyone outside America dead or impoverished.

Energy and raw materials are limited.

Trump is nothing.

Money is a problem for common people, it's not a problem for USA ruling elite who has endless money.

The only concern is energy and raw materials supply in the future, and the way to achieve is massive impoverishment through wars in rich zones like Europe and GCC.

USA ruling elite wants nothing from Eurasia but to die and a cheap funeral.
 
Does anyone else feel like maybe Trump wants the strait closed, so the US can renegotiate LNG contracts and also enrich himself and his family by manipulating the market?

That’s a double edged sword for USA:

1, it only benefits the US oil companies whilst US consumers pay higher prices at the pump.

2. It hurts US stooges who use their surplus dollars to buy US debt. If they have to pay higher prices - they cannot buy US debt. Which ultimately hurts the USA. Look at how Europeans, Japan and others have had to sell US debt to fund oil subsidies for their voters. US treasury is struggling to sell debt and has resorted to massive QE again.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top