ShapurII
Trusted Member
Iran and Saudi Arabia had excellent relations before King Faisal was assassinated. As for the Shah, the Shah also suffered from the same Iranian grandiosity that Khomeini did. Nevertheless, the Shah wasn't overthrown simply because he made a few remarks against Europeans in his interviews. He had turned millions of Iranians into his enemy for decades. Millions of Iranians poured the streets of Iran to topple him.Bro, youre being delusional. Iran became forever marked as an enemy when the shah started beefing with the Europeans and threatening US hegemony when he tried to create an alliance with the Arabs to control the oil. A plan that failed because of the Saudis.
It's a characteristic of Iranians to refuse any sort of accountability for our actions.
Why do you think Iran's size is an issue but countries larger than us live peacefully without going through the same issues? Iran is the world's 18th largest country. Saudi Arabia is even bigger than Iran. Why did the West prefer them over us if it's all about size? Because we are too loud. We talk too much when we should shut up. Again, nobody asked us to liberate Palestine and most Arabs don't even like us but we are sacrificing our national interests over such an irrelevant issue.I'm sorry but you don't know what you're talking about. You're missing the elephant in the room. Where was that rat Khomeini living before they chauffeured him into Tehran? You need to understand, because you seem to have difficulty doing so, that Iran's size is the problem. They'd love to cut it up into little statelets.
Imagine Iran being an enemy with only 4 million inhabitants. Nothing to worry about, just another middle eastern oil rich fiefdom.
Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan, they're all more populated than Iran and none of them are getting bombed by the US because their population size is a threat to the Western interests. If anything, Pakistanis are hardcore Muslims, much more zealous than average Iranians when it comes to Islam.







