You are fully right. At the other hand, those bases will be under constant attack any time the US tries to do something. So they are in an untenable position. My hunch is a slow quiet withdrawal, more towards the western side of west asia, i.e. jordan. But yes, their plans are in the rubbish bin. They built the biggest 'embassy' in the world in baghdad, as an operations center for the entire region. That was for nothing too. They won't be operating anything out of there anymore in the future. Plans change, reality exists. They will have to because Iran forced and forces them to.If that's really also the most important demand of Iran then I don't see any peace deal happening.
Because if Iran considers the US bases in the region as a threat to its security at the same time US consider those bases as extremely valuable. Through the presence of this hard power, US enjoys complete hegemony in the region and earn 100s of billions by extortion (oil rich countries spending 100s of billions of dollar on US equipment that's ultimately controlled by the US in the end. That drives US mega defense industry and employs thousands in the US. Also the hegemonic control pushes oil rich countries of region to invest in the US with close to trillion dollars).
So US wants absolute control of that region always. US cannot afford to leave the region as Iranian general demanded. It will be massive blow to US foreign policy and hegemony. US would prefer war but not accept withdrawal from the region.
The middle ground could be that they both decides that few bases to be abandoned like US 5th fleet HQ in Bahrain. That keeps US navy destroyers all in and around PG and strait of hormuz and bases in Iraq and Kuwait. But US will keep bases in KSA, UAE and others for sure.






