BananaRepublic
Trusted Member
you're right that the nukes fail to prevent someone from attacking you conventionally, but it also has a fear factor for the attacker, that if the one being attacked has RED LINES crossed, then it would spiral into a nukes war.
So between India-Pakistan, say we have 10 days fuel, and india has 15 days supply. When we run out early at 10, guess what, its nukes then. Last resort but its a MAD type situation then
Russia can turn europe into dust if it so wants, its trying to avoid it. But it may just have its hand forced.
Do u think fat kim cares? the moment he senses anyone attacking his land, he will fire those big boys and that would be it.
If Pakistan did not have nukes, we would've been attacked by many countries by now. So having them is keeping many at bay. Thanks to Dr AQ Khan and his team.
If Pakistan didn’t have nukes - India would threaten to nuke 24/7.
Their rabid dog saffrons would also demand tactical nukes if India ever got into a hole fighting a conventional war.
Nukes puts a ceiling on how far conventional wars can escalate.




