Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[VCheng]

MANAGEMENT. CONTROL

"Dialogue... future MANAGEMENT."


FUTURE management. i.e NOT during the 60 days. The understanding problem is definitely not on my side.

In any case, the MoU seems to be secondary at the moment, so arguing about what it says is probably not very fruitful at this point.

I still hope negotiations continue so that we can hope for a reasonable resolution.

 

[Oldenwisdom...قول بزرگ]

If Iran and the U.S. can’t agree on anything. Then Iran should just go nuclear and put this 30 year drama to rest.

I assume if Iran started dashing for bomb in June 2025 when the first war broke out then they should be close to having a few for testing by the end of the year.

The casus belli exists... as a legitimate pursuit of self defense against naked aggression backed only by the jungle law.
Going nuclear is only rational choice. And as I have said there are potentially legitimate voices now alluding that Iran has the devices to reciprocate such aggression. However, that doesn't provide the much needed deterrent.

 

[030292]

Yeah yeah I know it's the usual hate America spiel. Anyway I was being sarcastic. I wouldn't want the us or (any other country for that matter) ever using a tactical nuke.

Unless of course someone launches a nuclear attack against them forst

Fair enough mate, but your government doesnt make it hard to hate your country, the bar is unbelievably low with american people constantly electing warmongering war criminals like bush, obama, sleepy joe and orange clown for the past couple of decades.

 

[tsunset]

Iran should threaten to take control of Hawaii and plunder them until the last cent and steal everything in response to Trump's terror threats

 

[Sal12]

There is no justification for Iran to target commercial ships passing near Oman. It is also unreasonable to demand that these vessels sail closer to the Iranian side of the Strait of Hormuz so that Iran can potentially impose a toll in the future.

No country or operator would agree to such conditions for long.

 

[KAL-EL]

Fair enough mate, but your government doesnt make it hard to hate your country, the bar is unbelievably low with american people constantly electing warmongering war criminals like bush, obama, sleepy joe and orange clown for the past couple of decades.

Say whatever you will about Joe Biden, but if he was still in office, there would be no war with Iran.

BiBi netanyahu laid out plans to Obama to attack iran, Obama said no, then laid plans out to Biden, Biden said no.

Say whatever you want about those two presidents but we wouldn't be in this situation with either of them

You have issues with the American government I can understand. But most of the American people right now are against this war. No need to despise their citizens overall.

I mean I have issues with several governments around the world, not the people who inhabit the country.

 

[ShapurII]

8 Iranians killed and Iran’s response was…?

"Next time we will do this, we will do that, blah blah blah"

 

[ShapurII]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

They are even losing Arya

Do you think they care? The Islamic Republic is a regime without legitimacy ruling over Iran with brutal oppression. They even beat up the IR supporters who disagreed with the MoU.

People here who constantly label me as a traitor do not remember how I put all non-Iranians in their place 10-15 years ago on PDF.

At some point, you realize that the IR is just full of shit.

 

[Hassan Al-Somal]

There is no justification for Iran to target commercial ships passing near Oman. It is also unreasonable to demand that these vessels sail closer to the Iranian side of the Strait of Hormuz so that Iran can potentially impose a toll in the future.

No country or operator would agree to such conditions for long.

But that is the only leverage Iran has, and the article 5 of MOU clearly states:

"5 — Upon the signing of this MOU, the Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge, for 60 days only, from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, and considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles, and demining by the Islamic Republic of Iran will be instated within 30 days. The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialog with the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz in discussion with other Persian Gulf littoral states in line with the applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz."

By directing shipping traffic to the Omani side of the Strait of Hormuz under US protection and without consulting with Iran is a clear violation of article 5 in that agreement.

And with such background, not sure how you can make the case that "There is no justification for Iran to target commercial ships passing near Oman".

Remember, the dispute is not between Oman and Iran; it is between Iran and the US, where on the US side a guy named Bitchjamin Satanyahu is calling the shots.

 

[ShapurII]

Throwing Oman under the bus is the most convenient scapegoat. Oman has no say regardless. They cannot force US out. Generally they take the path of least resistance and no one should blame them for it. US is plowing through Omani waters as Oman doesn't exist and when told by Oman otherwise face bombing threats from none other than the orange-in-thief. And those ships in turn undermine the MoU the way Iran intends.

Suffice to say that this was in the making and Iran though being hard pressed to create a new normal, SHOULD NOT! The slight of hand or pulling the rabbit has been seen way too many times to be tolerated. Status quo doesn't exist and US is seeking to establish another one in a path of least resistance.

Orange couldn't protect zion and threw gulf statelets under the bus blatantly showing them their place. He knew that they are pressed for choice and China doesn't care... in fact all indications are that China wants a global reset. A oil crash that is inevitable if the inventories collapsed. The paper oil doesn't reflect the true price...the manipulators in action wouldn't want the reality to kick in at any point in time... Reserves helped cushion that blow... the problem with US shale is that it needs constant reinvestment. Fields generally dry up in one year... it remains the most expensive way ... to leverage market and fight wars.

You can apply the same logic to the Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and to some extent even Saudi Arabia. Maybe Iran should stop targeting these countries too?

 

[KAL-EL]

First of all upfront I freely admit I'm not completely aware of all of the facts Happening in the straight

But if those ships were traveling in Oman Waters, wasn't it provocative for the Iranians to fire on those ships?

 

[Kyussis]

Who designed and constructed this? Was it built using the annual US aid and by US companies?

I'm sure Israel was given the Blueprints.

 

[030292]

But that is the only leverage Iran has, and the article 5 of MOU clearly states:

"5 — Upon the signing of this MOU, the Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge, for 60 days only, from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, and considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles, and demining by the Islamic Republic of Iran will be instated within 30 days. The Islamic Republic of Iran will conduct dialog with the Sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz in discussion with other Persian Gulf littoral states in line with the applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz."

By directing shipping traffic to the Omani side of the Strait of Hormuz under US protection and without consulting with Iran is a clear violation of article 5 in that agreement.

And with such background, not sure how you can make the case that "There is no justification for Iran to target commercial ships passing near Oman".

Remember, the dispute is not between Oman and Iran; it is between Iran and the US, where on the US side a guy named Bitchjamin Satanyahu is calling the shots.

The MoU which even the US president personally signed is crystal clear, its just that the puppeteer satanyahu doesnt like to have a peace in the middle east so that he can rule over the bones of destroyed middle eastern countries and as such the puppet USA is throwing toys out of the pram.

There must be some vile stuff in the epstein files.

 

[lightning f57]

The US killed atleast 8 Iranians so a lack of a strong response will lead to more killings.

If GCC countries are involved in these attacks Iran needs to unload to mount up the pressure on them. It can't be proportionate when you have a mad man hell bent on threating to destroy you.

Unfortunately whilst trump and yahu are in power the ME will stay in constant war.

 

[Flotilla]

"Dialogue... future MANAGEMENT."


FUTURE management. i.e NOT during the 60 days. The understanding problem is definitely not on my side.

In any case, the MoU seems to be secondary at the moment, so arguing about what it says is probably not very fruitful at this point.

I still hope negotiations continue so that we can hope for a reasonable resolution.

According to international rules that points directly to article 22.4 of the UNCLOS where It is said clearly giving instructions!!!!!.

You don't need to wait 60 days for implementing the instructions given by Islamic Republic and recognized even by US. Burro!!!