Brother,
I understand you are trying to offer a counter opinion, which is okay, but let's be honest here. GCC people are largely lazy; they buy don't build.
They are hyper reliant on the US for their security and their own armed forces, although well-equipped, they largely lack an indigenous defense industry, relying and depending on foreign contractors to operate and maintain advanced platforms.
Historically their militaries have conducted nothing more than minor self-defense roles. As such they are simply not built or designed to function as a strong institution.
This is simply because their raison d'etre is to secure internal regime survival and border defense rather than projecting any form of expeditionary power.
There is a complete lack of Cohesion between the GCC nations, they may say things in public but don't sing from the same hymn sheet, even the touted unified military command - Peninsula Shield Force failed to achieve its enforcement and operational cohesion.
The outlook for the foreseeable in terms of GCC posture will be “active defense” plus enabling support for US-led operations whilst calling for "negotiations and deescalation" in public.
----
View attachment 205525
Strength Profile:
View attachment 205526
Iran's missiles, drones, and defensive geography would make any conflict prolonged, costly, and difficult to resolve decisively, the GCC nations know this, which is why they are playing possum for some time now.
Remember that the GCC nations are businessmen, they don't want anything to upset their apple cart.