Khorasan Black Flags
Trusted Member
- Thread starter
- #146,356
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The US already has more military bases near Khuzestan and Bushehr than it had around Syria. As I have said before, the US largest military base in the Middle East and North Africa is in Qatar which is not that far from both Khuzestan and Bushehr. And it will create more bases once it settles there, and it will start to destroy all land routes to Khuzestan and setup a border.What???
US had basically Syria surrounded from all sides... Jordan, Iraq, zion and even Turkiye...
The logistics of basing in Iran are infinitely harder. Besides Iran has an effective drone strategy. One that isn't saving American bases in supposedly safe zones in GCC and Jordan. Zion itself is keeping it's head down because they cannot effectively throttle Iranian response. You would have had that miliekowsky running like a bunny for an encore. Instead, that rats tail got a shellacking of lifetime... licking it's wounds. It can effectively end their project... as coming congress not only defunds them but perhaps sanctions the entity.
Seriously!!!The US already has more military bases near Khuzestan and Bushehr than it had around Syria. As I have said before, the US largest military base in the Middle East and North Africa is in Qatar which is not that far from both Khuzestan and Bushehr. And it will create more bases once it settles there, and it will start to destroy all land routes to Khuzestan and setup a border.
Remember if it was possible and Orange had support ... and men lining up to volunteer for an adventure in Iran... perhaps!In 1945, the Berlin war was created in just two weeks. Do you think building reinforcements around our oil fields will be that difficult for the US then? Do you think if the US, God forbids, can occupy our oil fields, it will give up on $15 trillion dollars worth of money and will just let it go?
The benefits go far beyond direct tolling income. Shaping behavior will force nations to avoid hostile actions including hosting bases, do business with Iran, buy and sell materials and technology, buy oil and petrochemicals, etc. and eventually align militarily. That coercive power is the foundation of the American empire. Iran can do the same. It is impossible to put a dollar figure on the value of that.The math doesn't math, to be honest with you. Even if Iran imposes a toll on the Strait of Hormuz as proposed by the IRGC, our annual income from the Strait of Hormuz will be about $40 billion. It will take 125 years for Iran to make 5 trillion dollars from the Strait of Hormuz.
And of course, the Strait of Hormuz will lose its relevance then because other countries will start to avoid the Strait of Hormuz. The Emirates can easily bypass the Strait of Hormuz by creating new infrastructure on the other side of it and tiny Sheikhdoms like Bahrain and Kuwait will use Saudi Arabia to bypass it. Saudi Arabia may even create a canal to bypass the Strait of Hormuz completely and charge a toll there and Arab states will use that canal which will be a shortcut to the Western countries as well. The toll will be economically justified due to shorter distance to Europe.
Yes, seriously. The US stayed in Afghanistan for 20 years, even established military bases there. The US could've held Afghanistan indefinitely if they wanted to. They left Afghanistan after turning the country into an even worse failed state than it initially was.Seriously!!!
You didn't just repeat that claptrap, right¿
Almost every base got hit in their safe zones... and you're saying they'll have an effective air bridge for logistics in Iran?
Do you remember Afghanistan?
US left weapons worth tens of billions because of logistics and that inspite of the fact Pakistan provided a land corridor. And when Pakistan stopped it for a country like Afghanistan it made things difficult for US! Where Hillary made less-than-an-appology to get their logistics running.
Iraq is also the size of multiple European countries. Afghanistan too. What's your point?Remember if it was possible and Orange had support ... and men lining up to volunteer for an adventure in Iran... perhaps!
But at a cost ... Iran is the size of western Europe!
Who said anything about blowing it up? That's a strawman fallacy.
We were talking about Iran losing trillions of dollars and you said Iran couldn't lose 5 trillion dollars. Who talked about blowing it up? If Iran loses its oil fields to occupying forces, Iran has lost trillions of dollars. But that's OK to you because you're not Iranian.
What you think as some random person on the internet has no importance in the war whatsoever. So, if your best argument for that is "I think it is so", then let's agree to disagree.
You are free to express your views and I am free to express mine. What does that have to do with the statement you made?
I said you were ignorant, not angry. Read it again. I said you were ignorant about the situation of Iran, as clearly demonstrated by your idea that Iran cannot lose 5 trillion dollars, and you not being Iranian even strengthens my position, not weaken it. So, stop pretending to be an Iran expert when your information is incomplete and mostly wrong.
No, you just disproved your point and discredited yourself. You demonstrated you did not understand the value of Iran's resources.
What happened to we are free to express our views?
If getting your stupid definition of winning the war challenged by other members triggers you, then you can put me on your ignore list.
his is the Iranian section of the forum and I'm an Iranian and can participate and challenge anything that concerns my country.
Not a pipeline, but a canal. Something like Volga-Don canal that has existed for decades. How do you plan to destroy something like the Volga-Don canal?The benefits go far beyond direct tolling income. Shaping behavior will force nations to avoid hostile actions including hosting bases, do business with Iran, buy and sell materials and technology, buy oil and petrochemicals, etc. and eventually align militarily. That coercive power is the foundation of the American empire. Iran can do the same. It is impossible to put a dollar figure on the value of that.
Pipelines can easily be destroyed if the will exists. The Russian pipeline was blown up on deep sea bed. All Iran has to do is disrupt the Saudi and UAE oil flow through pipes. One Shahed hit a day at a random pumping station will do the job. Or the entire processing facilities can go up in smoke in extreme cases. That part is easy. Iran currently possesses the capability to prevent them from exporting oil if it really wants to. If that comes to force it will be regional hegemony.
Petro Rial would be the crown jewel and the confluence of all the above.
Imagine dying to protect a country like Kuwait.
The Arabs are slowly roping in Pakistan against Iran.
It will lead to both Iran and Pakistan destroying themselves.
And creating an opening for their plethora of separatists.
Pakistani military needs to be careful about hiring itself out like a mercenary.
This is why it’s important to have a functioning political wing to provide balance.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.