r3alist
Elite Member
I don't disagree as wellOK, to sum up (your POV!)
1. KSA wont recognize zios
2. IR is making KSA weak
3. IR is zios party, which is actually looks like a muslim state but it is not (a majoosi)!
4. IR mimics or tries to work for the muslim interests but actually works for the zios!
suppose, all that is true...
what action has KSA taken against 1. USA 2. zios, who attacked IR?!!!
if KSA does not take any action rather openly gives bases to parties who are attacking IR, then, all the 4 points are actually not true!
The Saudis are where they are with us bases
I have criticised then as well, but they cannot sign their suicide by actively removing the Americans who they offshored their defence
yes the Iranians are taking out military structures but do we agree to bringing economic hardship to everyone for so long helps
To what extent do you draw the line on Saudi being attacked and undermined, why does it seem like a binary choice, because if the Mecca pact means anything then Saudi need to pump oil
Actually the Saudis are probably in agreement on USA bases in their land, obviously this needs time to change, why push the Saudis too far because if you kill oil revenue then what






