Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds



Meanwhile many Sunni Arabs will deflect and say that Iran is secretly partnering with Israel and that Iran doesn’t fight Israel enough

Meanwhile Arab so called leaders rally around Bibi like he is their new Saddam. These Arab leaders always need a strongman in the region to beat them and tell them how to act.

The majority of Arabs around us in the Middle East are our historical enemies. There is no doubt that they will use any opportunity to weaken Iran.

With the exception of only some Iraqis, Kuwaits, Bahrainis and Emiratis, and again, ONLY SOME OF THEM, the rest of Arabs, most notably Saudis and Palestinians, have always been hostile towards Iran and Iranians in the past. Let's not forget that Yaser Arafat publicly sided with Saddam against Iran. Hamas sided with Al-Qaeda against Syria and Hezbollah.

It is the fault of the Islamic Republic for sacrificing our national interests over the Palestinian cause.
 
Are you speaking for yourself or your mad dog lying president?
He’s speaking his opinion which most people share why use nukes when you can use MOABs to destroy airfields and bases and MOPs for hardened bunkers people start using nukes crazy president or not domino effect and enemies won’t hesitate to use them if he’s willing to use it and than threaten anyone that doesn’t comply
 
Once again. No nukes will be used.

Period. End of story.

There are claims that they have been used after hiroshima. When one side does not have anything to answer back the other than can use it confidentially claiming daisy cutter-moab or similar.
If it cannot be proven like the iraqi case above than most will think that it was not used as you said. Necessary radiation measurement monitoring tools nearby would prove that they were used immediately like for example a mini tactical nuke or a neutron bomb.
 
Last edited:

There are claims that they have been used after hiroshima. When one side does not have anything to answer back the other than can use it confidentially claiming daisy cutter-moab or similar.
If it cannot be proven like the iraqi case above than most will think that it was not be used as you said. Necessary radiation measurement monitoring tools nearby would prove that they were used immediately like for example a mini tactical nuke or a neutron bomb.
If a news source regarding America comes from a Russian government run news organization and it sounds outlandish most definitely fake
 

There are claims that they have been used after hiroshima. When one side does not have anything to answer back the other than can use it confidentially claiming daisy cutter-moab or similar.
If it cannot be proven like the iraqi case above than most will think that it was not be used as you said. Necessary radiation measurement monitoring tools nearby would prove that they were used immediately like for example a mini tactical nuke or a neutron bomb.
For FFS dude, the first Gulf War was 100 hours. Basically 4 days. So which closing day was it? The last day? Or the second to last?

There are claims and then there is proof.

Bring us proof. RT is is NOT proof.
 
And over Los Ángeles or San Diego?. He said not just about Irán but also even in US.
Can you just imagine if Biden would said something like that what would happen?.
You don't follow American politics as well as you think you do.

Perhaps you remember when Biden went on his rant about overthrowing the US government? That you would need F-15s and nukes?
 
If a news source regarding America comes from a Russian government run news organization and it sounds outlandish most definitely fake
It may or may not be fake. But the possibility of usage is real if it can be concealed as a moab strike and no radiation measurement is made on site immediately(especially neutron bomb has reduced radiation signature after a short while)
 
For FFS dude, the first Gulf War was 100 hours. Basically 4 days. So which closing day was it? The last day? Or the second to last?

There are claims and then there is proof.

Bring us proof. RT is is NOT proof.
I saw 2 things immediately which I knew automatically it was fake US nukes Iraq and RT I didn’t even open it 🤦 people have been scarping the bottom of the barrel lately for “news” no offense to anyone just being honest
 
I saw 2 things immediately which I knew automatically it was fake US nukes Iraq and RT I didn’t even open it 🤦 people have been scarping the bottom of the barrel lately for “news” no offense to anyone just being honest
The article is from 2008. It would not be difficult to confirm if the US "source" actually served in 10th Mountain.

If there were such a strike on Basra, the chances of anyone NOT seeing it border on zero. Basra also sits very close to the Iranian border. The Iranians would have picked up on it.

This event only happened in someone's mind whereas reality is very different.
 
You don't follow American politics as well as you think you do.

Perhaps you remember when Biden went on his rant about overthrowing the US government? That you would need F-15s and nukes?
Sooooo not that serious is that why you hate Biden 😆
 
The article is from 2008. It would not be difficult to confirm if the US "source" actually served in 10th Mountain.

If there were such a strike on Basra, the chances of anyone NOT seeing it border on zero. Basra also sits very close to the Iranian border. The Iranians would have picked up on it.

This event only happened in someone's mind whereas reality is very different.
Trust me rolling my eyes slapping my head sometimes what people want to believe
 
The article is from 2008. It would not be difficult to confirm if the US "source" actually served in 10th Mountain.

If there were such a strike on Basra, the chances of anyone NOT seeing it border on zero. Basra also sits very close to the Iranian border. The Iranians would have picked up on it.

This event only happened in someone's mind whereas reality is very different.
The guy in the article was a veteran and gave some interview to Rainews an Italian channel so the main source is not RT.

Tactical nuke could have been used on the deserted area south of Basra for area denial. Far from main population centers and too small yield to be detected by nearby countries. Iran at 1991 didnt have the means to precisely measure if the explosion was nuclear or not. It requires air assets for measurement if you are not close to the deployed site.

Still it may or may not be fake but the point was we cannot be 100% sure that it wasn't used. So we wont be sure in future usages of this type of weapon as well especially when used on a deserted site like mountain bases or similar.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top