Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Iran should regicide the kings of Bahrain and Jordan at their palaces with hypersonic missiles if the US launches a full scale attack against Iran, leaving them with no time to hide

All kings and their obsolete primitive monarchies in the region needs to go or be killed
With enthusiasm like that, it's little wonder the Muslim world is beating down the doors to side with Iran in this epic struggle.

I might be inclined to join myself.
 
Everyone is getting Flankers except us. And morons here say the Orcs are a much better ally.


What will you even do with Flankers against Israeli fighter jets exactly? I know that real war has shown that every weapon system has its limit. Even the F-35 is not a wunderwaffle but investing on Su-35s or even Su-57s seems like a dying cause.
 
+100 means more than 100. It's not my problem that you do not understand that 224 > 100.

As for F-16A, 80 F-16s were supposed to be delivered before 1980. Had the revolution not happened, Iran would've been in possession of 80 F-16s. That's what shortly means.

And the Shah was way more competent than the Islamic fools ruling over Iran. Iran was the world's 13th largest economy in 1979. Even the nuclear program that you guys boast about was started by the Shah and he imported laser isotope separation which was cutting edge back then and still is. Now look at where we are now. A war-torn country that Netanyahu bombs freely whenever he needs it for propaganda, with an economy that is falling behind all of our neighbors.
All that and he still fled with a suitcase under each arm! LOL!!!You better go dig him up and put him him back on the Peacock Throne, better yet why don't you go worship his dim whit son?
 
All that and he still fled with a suitcase under each arm! LOL!!!You better go dig him up and put him him back on the Peacock Throne, better yet why don't you go worship his dim whit son?
Well, at least he didn't get his 14-month old daughter killed while his son is currently busy begging the Americans to negotiate with his father's murderer instead of trying to avenge his father.

By the way, his son couldn't even show up for the burial of his father, who couldn't be buried for months LOL Also, worshipping people is for the Basijis who worshipped that idiot who deprived Iran of ICBMs and nukes.
 
As long as they are a thorn in your side they will remain near and dear to my heart!
Lmao, bro, you won't change will you?

I mean, I suspect Asim Munir the FM didn't think about Iran "facilitating"the Taliban military against Pakistan when he unleashed the Balochi insurgency in Iran to pressure Iran to help US?

I mean, no country has beaten the Taliban militarily yet...so I can say Pakistan doesn't have what it takes to bea the Taliban, so Pakistan should find a way to stop the fighting with by Taliban soon, because it will get worse for Pakistan the longer it continues. If Pakistan starts losing territory and internal control due it's war against the Taliban, China will stop supporting it militarily - the harsh truth .
 
How do you think Iran can survive a siege for 5 years?
They're already shutting down Iran's land routes and air lines and have imposed a naval blockade on Iran's imports/exports. How do you think Iran can live with that for 5 years?
Self reliance and disruption of neighbors who are acting like enemies. it won't be easy, but Iran is a country that's hard to live with or near if it isn't happy and treats you as an enemy ( Iraq still doesn't want any beef bro), even white colonizers from far away know this.
 
No trade with Iran, Afghanistan and india-, is this why your country accepted money from KSA for mercenary services offered in lieu of lack of trade with your neighbors?
Here's a brief reminder of Pakistani history for all and sundry visitors to this thread.

USA, Japan, most of Eurozone, IMF all sanctioned Pakistan in 1998 following our nuclear tests. WHATEVER FLOWS OR FLOWED IN AND OUT OF AFG/IRAN WAS DWARFED BY OUR TRADE WITH USA, even in late 90s prior to nuclear tests.

Of course, and interestingly enough, our tests were greeted positively in 1998 by Afg, Iran, KSA, China and other "global south" nations but trade with such nations was far smaller than with USA and Europe (and, barring China, that still is the case) - those were different times when all our interests aligned better.

Why am I telling you this?

It is relevant on a thread like this and in response to comments like yours, to highlight the sacrifices needed by nations like yours and mine in the interests of national security.

Not KSA, not USA, not Iran, not Talibs, not anyone comes ahead of our sovereignty. Decisions we make are made with our interests in mind, not anyone else's. If others benefit from our decisions, it is happenstance, and all the better for all parties. But if we need to sacrifice even our biggest trade partner for our security, it will happen in a flash.

"We (Pakistan) will eat grass, even go hungry, but we will get one of our own (atom bomb). We have no other choice!"

@Meengla (tagging you sir as you know better than I do of aforementioned sacrifices)
 
People across the world had enough of these reactionary kings and their obsolete monarchies with numbers in their names

The world should be cleansed and purged of kings and queens and their vassals

Mass-regicide across the region and eventually the world needs to happen or the region will never find peace and stability

Iran did a wonderful job by removing the useless sold out kings and princes from the country, it's too bad they couldn't trial and punish them in front of the people. Iran has to expand its anti-king policy outside Iran's borders

We are not in year 1500 anymore, Kings need to go or die

Democracies and corrupt elected leaders are more easy to infiltrate by superpowers. Weak leaders, easy to blackmail.

Sovereign countries need strong leaders with full powers to stop the USA snake plots.

Praise shitdemocracies is Western narrative. Long life to kings and dictatorships.

Claim something is not modern is Western social engineering argument.
We dont need to be modern in social neither politics, all was invented time ago.

To be modern is only something to wish in science and technology.
But in social sciences to be "modern" is just decadence, the same primitive decadence of monkeys living without civilization, sex degeneration and atheism are called modern things too. In fact it's not modern, it's the most primitive decadence and way of organize a society.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top