SiliconBit (silicon0000)
Trusted Member
Easy their princess
The fatwa was unfortunate, if not accurate
A weapon like a nuclear bomb that kills humans, men, women, children so indiscriminately is possibly haram, so the fatwa itself seems logical
However Iran seems to have pushed gradually towards a nuclear weapons program REGARDLESS
What held it back wasn't the fatwa, it was the threat of U.S attack backed by a coalition
In 2003, the U.S was entrenched in iraq and it has already been in Afghanistan since 2001
Iran was surrounded, it takes time to develop a nuclear warhead and time to make a workable bomb/warhead that can be placed on a missile
The U.S was thrown out of Afghanistan only 4 years ago
And half left Iraq about 10
Iran did it's best, as a isolated and sanctioned state to create a weapons industry whilst trying to not be attacked by a coalition of states
It didn't help that the county was full of shah supporting murtad scum, who are attacking their own country to make it a lackey for the west
With all due respect, I don't understand the Supreme Leader's logic. Why did he initially restrict Iran from having nuclear weapons (and seemingly fail to grasp the deterrence they provide)? And if he still believes Iran shouldn't have them, then why is he fighting a war that will ultimately lead to Iran being controlled by rulers no different from those in Jordan or the UAE? Iran should either pursue nuclear weapons or surrender its uranium enrichment program. Why play a losing game?









