Brutal.
Registered Member
Only if they had a competent airforce. Problem is they are dependant on missiles. Cant fight so many countries just with missiles.Would Iran be justified in targeting the bases which will be used by US to hit Iran?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Only if they had a competent airforce. Problem is they are dependant on missiles. Cant fight so many countries just with missiles.Would Iran be justified in targeting the bases which will be used by US to hit Iran?
So many people on this forum are quick to blame China, Russia, India, etc., but I'm not sure what exactly they were expecting. These countries might offer diplomatic niceties and do business when it's mutually beneficial but they’re not going to throw away their long-term strategic interests to jump into a conflict that isn’t theirs.Never forget, Russians are white. They will side with whites everytime. we should not expect anything from them
A lesson for the so-called leftist liberal pro-western secularists. You will never be one of them no matter what you try.
It is not Iran fault that this is happening to Israel. Israel started this and Iran has the right to defend itself.
so at last you see what is the problem with interceptors and fighter inside mountain air bases
UAE needs one for sure.....loll...
Only shows you have been completely (deliberately, most likely) ignorant of many facts such as creation of Hamas resistance and Hezbullah.I have a different perspective from many others here, as much of the discussion seems to reflect one-sided narratives.
I do criticise the U.S. and the West for their monopolies and geopolitical dirty games, which often come at the cost of human lives.
At the same time, I also criticise Iran for supporting non-state actors such as Hamas and Hezbollah, which contributes to regional instability.
A stable and peaceful Iran would benefit the entire region. Iran absolutely has the right to defend itself and pursue what’s best for its people—but that should come with a focus on internal progress and a better future and safety for its citizens.
US foreign policy has been hegemonic and never altruistic from it's inception on, the Monroe doctrine of one of american founding fathers and the fifth president called for the whole western hempisphere, i.e. all of North and South American to be under US control.It's hard to predict how the Chinese government and people will behave if China becomes the undisputed, sole, global power for a few decades. People change; attitudes change.
The US also started out with lofty ambitions and stayed true to them for a long time. It was US President Johnson who was the force behind European colonial powers giving freedom to their colonies after WW2.
Over time the US foreign policy has been taken over by less altruistic goals. Will China do the same? Maybe it is a Machiavellian necessity to become like that in order to stay at the top.
Yes, the Iranian situation is complicated. They are strongly nationalistic but also infested with Israeli spies. They are proudly and fiercely Muslim, and they also have a super strong bond to their ancient heritage. This leads some to dream of reclaiming their ancient dominance and complicates the relationship with neighbors. It all goes south when other regional countries have their own dreams of reclaiming their own past glories. If only these countries could look at the United States and see that focusing on the future rather than the past may be a more fruitful enterprise.
I had posted these links on one dynamic between missiles and interceptors.What’s Iran’s Game plan here? Fire 5-10 missiles per day until Fordow also gets blown up?
I am trying to understand the strategy
www.middleeasteye.net
Regime change in Saudi Arabia would deliver even bigger benefits.Regime change in the UAE will be the single biggest gift to Muslims around the world.
Agreed, I'm an unconditional supporter of our Army (as a matter of our geolocation, I unconditionally believe they are more important than any political entity or person).Do you think people of Pakistan will allow Iran to be attacked from their soil? Specially when its taking on Israel?
Noone will risk a massive revolt within country to please US.
US foreign policy has been hegemonic and never altruistic from it's inception on, the Monroe doctrine of one of american founding fathers and the fifth president called for the whole western hempisphere, i.e. all of North and South American to be under US control.
You can follow the trajectory of US expansion, land theft, conquest, annexation, enslavement and colonization and support of other colonial powers throughout its history.
No revolt is happening in Pakistan over Iran. We killed 70K of our own people on behalf of their amreeki masters, helped americans drone our own children by the thousands, massacred girls in a madressa in the middle of Islamabad and our beghairat cuck qom stayed home.Do you think people of Pakistan will allow Iran to be attacked from their soil? Specially when its taking on Israel?
Noone will risk a massive revolt within country to please US.
sorry, my mixup, Original one was from Sharon, latest one was form Yair of Opposition.Ariel Sharon ? That evil monster has been dead for many years. Maybe you mean some other politican.
For what it's worth, FM/AM is said to be a Shia. That may (or may not) make him a bit more acceptable to Iran and may allow him to mediate between the US and Iran.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.