Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[BigMela2onin]

View attachment 130977

AI has truly devastated the internet

 

[Liquidator]

If Iran attacks USA bases in retaliation, will this bring in NATO to the Middle East?

Probably

But remember...NATO nation attacked Iran FIRST.

 

[Shags101]

Iran will not sit there getting bombed by the biggest ordnances of the world supported by all the west and do nothing

Yeah I agree on one thing it’s eerily quiet as I said in a earlier post it either means something very very big about to happen or the Iranians are about to call it a day I’m going to be optimistic in a something is about to happen that might go bananas all over the Middle East and the biggest winner is Israel if that happens

 

[Maarkhoor]

I heard that Iran hit US basis.

Can anyone confirm that?

 

[mangekyo]

Iran threatened to activate terror cells on US soil if Trump attacks their nuclear facilities. Thats why Trump attacked them. Make it make sense. But the dumb Americans will eat this up

https://www.newsmax.com/politics/iran-terrorists-proxies/2025/06/23/id/1216074/

 

[Watandar]

If Iran attacks USA bases in retaliation, will this bring in NATO to the Middle East?

NATO is already there isnt it ? Its covert but we have seen reports of NATO country aircraft providing refueling activities, its Cyprus base assisting Israel and also NATO shooting down Iranian missiles. But Iran attacking US bases in mideast will still be a terrible move equal to falling into a trap. Iran hitting back at Israel is the only right move.

 

[Vortex]

View attachment 130874
Truck activity before the strike

Are the trucks safe after this picture ?

 

[BigMela2onin]

Iran needs to be given a serious diplomatic off-ramp by the US if the US wants to prevent setting the Middle East ablaze. This will not stop with any dreamed up "regime change" in Iran. Remember what happened with the power vacuums in Afg-Irq-Syria?

When will they learn - these are complex regions with complex power plays beneath the surface. A weakened Shia crescent will be a breeding ground for ISIS.

Well ISIS is their agent in the region

 

[Forsvaret]

But remember...NATO nation attacked Iran FIRST.

NATO is a defensive alliance, not offensive. Iran has to attack one of its member countries first before NATO countries take collective action.

 

[MH.Yang]

China accounts for 70% of the production of cotton linters used to make explosives, 40% of urea production, and 53% of steel production. Rare earths, which are essential for military equipment, are produced in China at a rate exceeding 90%, and China has already restricted the use of rare earths by the United States for military purposes. How many people believe that Iran would lose if it were to engage in a protracted war of attrition?

Unless the U.S. sends ground troops into Iran and shows China a huge opportunity. Otherwise China will not want a prolonged state of war in the Middle East.

 

[NA71]

AI has truly devastated the internet

 

[dbc]

Israel has zero aircraft capable of delivering the GBU-57 except perhaps out the backend of a C-130.

no, the GBU-57 needs to be dropped from 50,000 ft. That's way too high for the C-130.

 

[Liquidator]

NATO is a defensive alliance, not offensive. Iran has to attack one of its member countries first before NATO countries take collective action.

That's my point

NATO will join and pretend it's doing so in self-defence.

 

[Tabmachine]

I have to disagree here. We could have had a good democracy, but unfortunately, the west has done anything they can to meddle with our internal affairs. Had we done the same to them, they would have been in the same situation as us.

Iran could, but I would argue that your culture is a little unique in asia. You are a more philosophical people, and I think that would enable you to adhere to a broad spectrum of political configurations. However, that does not mean democracy is optimal. I dont know what the optimal structure for Iran would be ofc.

 

[Cash gk]

Man, I just can't believe their military was still using American GPS few days ago ? What were they thinking ?

The truth about GPS systems that most people don't realize is that they're essentially spy tools for the Americans. Whenever someone programs target coordinates into a missile's GPS guidance system, the U.S. military gets instant notifications. They've set up invisible electronic fences around all important locations worldwide. So the moment you enter coordinates for say, an Israeli target, Washington knows immediately - they can see exactly what you're aiming at, calculate the flight time, and predict the impact moment with scary accuracy.

This isn't just theory - Pakistan found out the hard way back in 2019. When their military programmed Indian targets into their missiles using GPS, the Americans immediately tipped off India about the planned attack. It was such a massive security breach that Pakistan completely stopped using GPS after that incident. I remember reading about it at the time, though I can't seem to find those reports anymore - they've probably been buried or removed from the internet.

That's why Pakistan switched to China's BeiDou navigation system instead. Unlike GPS which answers to the U.S. government, BeiDou gives them actual operational security. The whole episode exposed how these "neutral" navigation systems are really just intelligence-gathering fronts for Western powers. Any country still using GPS for military purposes might as well be sending their battle plans directly to the Pentagon before their own troops even see them.

It makes you wonder - how many other nations have walked into this trap without realizing it? And how many "accidental" leaks or failed operations were actually caused by this hidden backdoor in the GPS system? The scary part is most military planners don't even question it - they just assume the technology is neutral when in reality, it's completely controlled by one government. Pakistan's experience should serve as a warning to every nation that values its military sovereignty.