Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Watandar said:
Iran needs to build an anti-satellite capability. It was a huge disadvantage in the war for the US to see everything happening in Iran via satellites/reconnaissance drones and feed all the data to Israeli targeting.
Click to expand...
Even if Iran does possess such technology, we will never dare to use it against the US.

I'm sure you can see a clear pattern in Iran's behavior: Iran always refrains from war with the US, for very good, reasonable reasons. It shows that our military commanders are not stupid.
 
GWXP said:
If we use unclassified CENTCOM data then Iran had 3000 ballistic missiles in 2020 up from 1000 missiles in 2010 indicating annual production rate of 200 missiles per year.

At this rate of production Iran had to produce another 1000 missiles between 2020 and 2025 bringing the total size of the arsenal to 4000 missiles.

Of these 4000 missiles, 150 have been launched during Operation True Promise 1 and True Promise 2 and another 550 missiles during the recent war.

So Iranian missile arsenal at this moment might be around 3300 missiles left of which probably 1300 missiles are short range and 2000 missiles are long range and can reach Israel.

Of these 550 missiles fired most were old liquid fuel missiles produced between 2003 and 2010 with the age between 22-15 years.

Unclassified reports claim after October 2024 Iran produced 50 ballistic missiles per month of 600 missiles per year.

Short range missiles should be phased out and Iran should bring the total arsenal of its long range ballistic missiles (Khaybarshekan) to 12.000 missiles by 2035 in case if Iran has to fight a coalition of US+Israel+Saudi Arabia+UAE+UK+France+Turkey.

To achieve that, Iran must produce 10.000 missiles in the next 10 years or 1000 missiles per year or 83 missiles per month.

1000 Khaybarshekan missiles per year at an average cost of 1mln per unit means Iran must spend 1bln$ per year on ballistic missiles.
Click to expand...

Your calculation also have to account for possibilities of missile bases & launchers lost in Israeli attacks. If Iran agreed to ceasefire, that means a strong possibility that Iran is also running low on missiles just like Israel could be running low on interceptors.

Also, I believe 2000 medium or long range missile is exaggerated number. These are extremely big and heavy ballistic missiles. The storage space needed for this much amount needs to be extremely large. Its logistical nightmare to securely store such huge numbers.
 
What is happening is a truce. What happened yesterday was an arrangement for each party to emerge in a way that saves face.

The Americans announced that they had struck the reactors and destroyed the program, but this is not true.

The Americans want to keep the Iranians as a source of terror for the Gulf goats, milking them and obtaining Gulf money by constantly terrorizing them.

The Iranians struck an American base in Iraq, an American base in Syria, and the Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, to save face, in addition to a final strike against Israel.

The warning was given in advance so that the Americans would not suffer any losses, as if they had agreed to it. The Iranians emerged from the war by preserving what remained of their program and their goal of obtaining a nuclear bomb in front of their people.

The Israelis found themselves losing, and they are the biggest losers. Their reputation has been destroyed, and any future war will have the primary goal of quickly destroying their military facilities and military bases in the first hour of fighting. This makes Israel's project as a state a failure.

They thought they would bring the Middle East under their control, but they failed. They are oppressed, humiliated, and exposed, and their people are fully aware that their state is doomed and has no future. Rather, everyone is encouraged to attack them, and their extermination is easier than anyone expects.

The Jews will pour money into Israel and prepare for a new round of military conflict. The next round will be a more violent war.

The Iranians need a lot to build their military capabilities with effective weapons. They need command and control systems, effective air defense systems, and an air force to manage multi-domain battles.

The Gulf paid the money and found their competitors extremely weak and under threat, and that the Americans themselves will be unable to protect them from any attacks.

What is certain is that the war is not over, but rather a truce, whether long or short. The war is inevitable, and each side must prepare for the other.
 
Be dazzled said:
Rajesh lacks brain and life purpose but...
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Sometimes I'm so surprised that I start to fantasize that maybe these clips are AI generated, but then again I remember the things I have seen in the past about Indians and it immediately ceases to surprise me lol
 
Watandar said:
Iran needs to build an anti-satellite capability. It was a huge disadvantage in the war for the US to see everything happening in Iran via satellites/reconnaissance drones and feed all the data to Israeli targeting.
Click to expand...
Dude you have to understand that attacking the U.S or pre-emptively attacking them is pure suicide

What happened to the last country that pre-emptively hit the U.S?

U.S can flatten Iran with 100000x more firepower than what Israel shown, their carpet bombing with dedicated conventional bombers are the most brutal in modern history

Israel operations are a pure joke compared to US ordnances. Avoid war with them at all cost
 
tsunset said:
Dude you have to understand that attacking the U.S or pre-emptively attacking them is pure suicide

What happened to the last country that pre-emptively hit the U.S?

U.S can flatten Iran with 100000x more firepower than what Israel shown, their carpet bombing with dedicated bombers are the most brutal in modern history

Israel operations are a pure joke compared to US ordnances. Avoid war with them at all cost
Click to expand...
I get that, although the flaw in that thinking is that you are allowing the US to attack Iran risk-free via its proxy Israel. There is also a difference between destroying equipment and actually killing Americans. There were Israeli satellites collecting data as well and if Iran could have taken them out, Israel would be even more dependent on the US and forced to obey them.
 
Watandar said:
I get that, although the flaw in that thinking is that you are allowing the US to attack Iran risk-free via its proxy Israel. There is also a difference between destroying equipment and actually killing Americans. There were Israeli satellites collecting data as well and if Iran could have taken them out, Israel would be even more dependent on the US and forced to obey them.
Click to expand...
I can assure to you that the US will flatten Iran if Iran fires an ABM at one of their satellites

With the space debris from the destroyed satellite, China and Russia will not be happy with that

I don't say that having the capability is useless, it can be used in times of full war with them

The safest approach is to target Israeli satellites, but again the debris will make China and Russia angry, also Iran would be the first country in history to fire at a satellite, thus opening the door for the US to do the same to our satellites and we cannot quickly replace them, it took us 40 years of space program to launch a satellite
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 5 more.
    • Total: 206 (members: 28, guests: 178)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top