Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds
- Thread starter Khorasan Black Flags
- Start date
Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
show me where Europeans admit to violating JCPOA
BigMela2onin
Registered Member
Seems fake, there's been no program for 23 years.
OldTwilight
Registered Member
These days , i rather to wast my times on anything rather than following the disgrace I.R is bringing to our nation ...
speak for yourself...
In other words, it means they want to re-start the war
Bharatah
SpeedLimited
They admit that due to the delay in activating SNAPBACK and the window they waited to try to do it, why didn't they activate it 3 months ago? 6 months ago? 3 years ago? I'll explain:
Because they're aware of the complications(for the irregularities they committed), they need the UN Security Council presidency to be a 100% puppet of theirs to initiate the request; otherwise, the snapback request would be denied(like USA Snapback attempt was in 2020). This is exactly what's happening now: the UNSC presidency is held by South Korea, a puppet country militarily occupied by the US. In October, RUSSIA enters (the presidency of the UNSC) and then they can forget about activating SNAPBACK (this is another reason why Russia asked for 6 months + ...) which can only be activated until October 18, 2025 !
NOTE : This implies another violation of the agreement. Beyond the E3 not having complied with it and therefore not being able to activate the snapback, it clearly shows the US's "hand" behind everything, which further aggravates the legal impossibility of the situation(because the US snapbacks have already been denied).
Bharatah
SpeedLimited
Absurd fake news made for an idiot(Reuters). If Iran had to clean up something, it would have done it already, not wait now. It's fake news created to force the European puppets to risk trying to implement SNAPBACK.
Doubtful any of these sanctions would be applied by China or Russia for instance, but yes, Iran aircrafts wouldn't be able to get in Europe, Asstralia or western countries anymore (what a loss.........)
Iran Update, August 27, 2025
The E3 (the United Kingdom, Germany, and France) will reportedly initiate the JCPOA snapback process as soon as August 28.www.understandingwar.org
Iran Update, August 27, 2025
Aug 27, 2025 - ISW Press
Ben Rezaei, Ria Reddy, Nidal Morrison, Avery Borens, Adham Fattah, Ben Schmida, Kelly Campa, Henry Jenks, and Annika Ganzeveld
Information Cutoff: 2:00 PM ET
The E3 (the United Kingdom, Germany, and France) will reportedly initiate the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) snapback process as soon as August 28, according to three European diplomats and one Western diplomat.[1] The JCPOA snapback mechanism allows JCPOA signatories to reimpose UN Security Council (UNSC) sanctions on Iran in the event of “significant non-performance” of JCPOA commitments.[2] The snapback mechanism is currently set to expire on October 18, 2025. The E3 imposed a deadline of August 31 on Iran to make meaningful progress toward a nuclear deal, such as by renewing cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and resuming negotiations with the United States.[3] The E3 offered to postpone the expiration of the snapback mechanism to allow Iran more time to negotiate with the United States.[4] Iran reportedly failed to make “sufficiently tangible commitments” during the most recent Iran-E3 meeting in Geneva on August 26.[5] Another source stated that Iran offered “very little to work with” to secure an extension.[6]
It is unclear if the E3 will initiate the dispute resolution process outlined in the JCPOA or directly refer Iran's non-compliance to the UNSC. The dispute resolution process can take up to 35 days and involves a series of steps that aim to resolve non-compliance issues.[7] The E3 can choose to engage in the dispute resolution process and then refer the issue to the UNSC if it believes that Iran continues to show "significant non-performance." The E3 can, conversely, bypass the dispute resolution process and directly refer the non-compliance issue to the UNSC. The E3 would be required to include a description of "the good-faith efforts the [E3] made to exhaust the dispute resolution process" when they refer Iran’s non-compliance to the UNSC.[8] The JCPOA gives the UNSC 30 days to pass a resolution to extend sanctions relief for Iran, but UNSC permanent members (the United States, the United Kingdom, France, China, and Russia) can veto such a resolution. The E3 is reportedly hopeful that Iran will make unspecified commitments regarding its nuclear program within 30 days that will allow the E3 to avoid reimposing UNSC sanctions on Iran.[9] The snapback mechanism would reimpose six UNSC resolutions on Iran, including bans on the transfer of conventional arms to and from Iran, international support for Iran's missile program, enrichment-related activities, and the testing and development of nuclear-capable missiles.[10]
Hardline Iranian parliamentarians criticized the return of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors to Iran and argued that their return undermines a recent law that parliament passed to restrict cooperation with the agency.[11] These criticisms arose after IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi announced on August 26 that IAEA inspectors would soon resume inspections in Iran.[12] Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) Spokesperson Behrouz Kamalvandi stated on August 27 that IAEA inspectors will supervise the fuel replacement at the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP) to ensure that electricity is produced in a timely manner.[13] The Iranian parliament passed a bill on June 25 to suspend all cooperation with the IAEA.[14]
The Iranian Parliamentary National Security and Foreign Policy Commission warned on August 26 that the AEOI and Foreign Affairs Ministry must fully comply with the law suspending cooperation with the IAEA.[15] Hardline parliamentarians separately accused the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) on August 27 of concealing decisions from parliament and the public.[16] Hardliners warned that continued government cooperation with the IAEA would justify legal action against senior SNSC officials for undermining parliament’s authority.[17] Foreign Affairs Minister Abbas Araghchi stated on August 20 that Iran cannot completely end all cooperation with the IAEA since the upcoming fuel replacement at the BNPP requires inspectors to be present. Araghchi emphasized that the return of IAEA inspectors to Iran would take place within the framework of the law that parliament passed on July 25.[18] The IAEA inspectors currently in Iran are reportedly only permitted to oversee the fuel replacement at the BNPP and cannot access or inspect damaged nuclear sites such as Natanz and Fordow.[19] These sites remain largely inaccessible to any party.
OldTwilight
Registered Member
About JCPOA trigger mechanism , well , from the day one I was sure that EU will just use it in the end of JCPOA , it was too powerful and good option for the west that not use ....
entirety of IR signed JCPOA and they couldn't see this simple day which even a no name guy ( me ) could see from years away , because they are incompetent corrupted people who are surrounding themselves among bunch of guys even worse than themselves
entirety of IR signed JCPOA and they couldn't see this simple day which even a no name guy ( me ) could see from years away , because they are incompetent corrupted people who are surrounding themselves among bunch of guys even worse than themselves
Snapback doesn't have much economic impact. However, it is a signal they want to resume the war. Don't forget that as of today, Europeans & Israel are the TOP warmongers, although they can't do anything without U.S. support..........
OldTwilight
Registered Member
I.R never intends to fight the west , they are just bullying Iranians and other Muslims with their proxies ...
Their first victim are Iranians who payed for nuke more than any other nation and now , we event dont have anything ....
we already lost in every front ...
این یک بیت وصف کل جمهوری اسلامی هست:
یا رب مباد که گدا معتبر شود / گر معتبر شود ز خدا بی خبر شود
Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
30 days starts now
Bharatah
SpeedLimited
As i already said before :
Russia: E3's snapback decision has no legal bearing
Russian First Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN Dmitry Polyansky said on Thursday that the E3's (Britain, Germany, France) decision to reimpose snapback sanctions against Iran has no legal effect.
"We believe that the E3's decision cannot and should not entail any legal or procedural consequences. It is merely an escalatory step," Polyansky told journalists.
Earlier today, E3 triggered the snapback mechanism in order to reimplement UN sanctions against Iran.
======
NOTE: The REAL objective of the SNAPBACK maneuver is TRY to force Iran to accept a "defeat deal" like SYRIA, West Bank, etc but that's not going to happen.
NOTE2: the "30 days" were counted to end before Russia takes over the presidency of the UNSC (October/2025), to try to block Russian action. Snapback expires in full on October 18, 2025.
Last edited:
Pakistan Defence Latest
Country Watch Latest
-
Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds (216 Viewers)- Latest: TallarnDesertRaider
-
-
-
-
Latest Posts
-
Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds (216 Viewers)
- Latest: TallarnDesertRaider
-
-
-