r3alist
Elite Member
It is very much that simple, especially for a (percieved by the zionist) "regional pariah" like Iran. It would be foolish to assume that Israel and the west would not call Iran's bluff if it only had 2 or 3 nuke during a nuke test. Iran would get destroyed for only building and using only 2 or 3 nukes which may be a price a non-Iranian like you is happy to pay, but not us who hold more value to our nation. Different story if Iran has a sizeable arsenal which would destroy a few nations and entire naval forces. An no, a single nuke wouldnt destroy Israel, it would wipe out a city at best.
If you go for nuclear attack I suppose you have to game out retaliations, other reactions and net results, so this thinking described makes sense.
Even if you do have nuclear weapons it really just acts as a deterrent in the very worst possible scenarios like overwhelming invasion.
If that's not happening you actually need to focus on the usual conventional aspects of defense.
Btw, let's supposedly Iran did get nukes, it did posture intent to strike, I can't see Pakistans nukes also not being a target for removal.




