Iranian Air Force (IRIAF/IRGC-ASF) | News and Discussions

let ask you a question how much is upgrading our mig-29 to smt standard

25-30 Million USD minimum if 9.12 is brought to SMT standard with airframe re-building.

MIG-29UPG to SMT cost is recorded at 16 Million USD.

and which is better that kowsar or mig-29 smt ?

At BVR ranges they are equivalent. Zhuk M and Grifo-346 are equivalent, both airplanes have small RCS, and both have good e-warfare suites.

In WVR, MIG-29SMT is the clear winner because of IRST and 37K lbs wet thrust, Kowsar can get the lucky kill with HMD slaved HOBS but it will not be easy, plane is just way underpowered against the mighty Fulcrum. To score a Fulcurum kill at WVR, Kowsar will need an AL-31/41 in its back. That is one on one scenario, 2-3 x Kowsars against one MIG-29 SMT is an instant Fulcurum death, same also if Kowsar is flying with lets say 3 x datalinked Karrars carrying Azaraksh HOBS.

For CAP, Kowsar having double duplex datalinking with entire drone and fighter fleet and IADS is cheaper and more effective to operate.
 
Babak Taghvaee said that brand new built from scratch Kowsar without armaments or depot spares costs around 10 Million USD which makes sense, its composite built airframe with FBW and is extensively heavier on the avionics side. One that is rebuilt like Mirage "KFIR" program, costs 7.5 million USD with new OWJ engines, FBW, new wings, tails, radomes etc. The slides that showed its specs mentioned same costs I think.

Now if you add a combat suite of local AIM-7 + Azaraksh HOBS for WVR, few SDB PGMs that we have seen on its wings in the assembly line or the ECM pods then yes the cost goes up to 17 Million USD. The head of SAIRAN openly talked of installing 360 deg covering HMD (might be slaved to HOBS) and AESA radar on "Domestic fighters". His words seemed to be true considering the recently seen HMD in Dowran upgraded F-4E/D during Esfahan Gunnary exercises. So yes the cost touches 20 Million.



F-5 means nothing when a capability-wise plane comes in the category or even exceeds the likes of FCK-1 or FA-50. The problem lies in the mentality of leadership. They wanted a light CAP fighter so they tasked the HESA to put as much cheese on the top as possible but refused to cover the cost when the plane was ready so is Reza correct in saying that this much extensive modernization was not needed when simple Brazilian F-5M like program could have been more feasible? I feel he is kinda right because high tech Kowsar is now sitting on the assembly line because of20 Million USD tag while a lower-grade F-5M like program costing 5-8 million USD per airframe could have been much more feasible.

Comparing Kowsar with SU-35S is like comparing Dezful missile with Sejjil. Different roles and duties so cant be compared. But for the sake of argument, just the airframe of SU-35S costs 45 Million USD, one that comes with depot spares, WVR, PGMS, Khibiny, R73/77/37, KH-31/58 will cost around 85 million USD easily. Indian SU-30MKI costs 65 million USD and is much downgraded than SU-35S so one can assume what Iran is paying.

https://bulgarianmilitary.com/2024/...-expanding-su-35-sales-on-global-arms-market/



20 Million price tag is not bad for this much capability considering this is a 100 % domestic program so you can build as many with local parts, and armaments as possible. The point Reza is raising, was this much modernisation even needed. Are IRIAF officials stupid or they were expecting leadership to increase the IRIAF budget by 5 folds in coming years?

Kowsar-page-0003.jpg


My concern is that considering IRIAF is the weakest force among Iranian branches, is the decision-making even rational among its big wigs?
Maybe 20 millions is a lot of money at first. But if IRIAF buys two squadrons for secondary bases like Konarak or Masshad you have a digital light multirole fighter capable of CAS and CAP with literally thousands of flyable hours, two engines and with a lot of communality with F5, from hangars to electric starters, ladders, tools and procedures. Kowsar can replace easily chinese F7M and Mirage F1.

IMO IRIAF would be very well served with 48 Kowsar and 48 Su-35.

Many countries are retiring from service F5 not for being obsolete they do It because the end of the life of their airframe.

The problem it is when someone give them a paper that it is not suitable for (like air superiority). But for CAS in Sistan Baluchestan and CAP for any renegade civil aircraft or drone it is more than good. And finally keeps national autonomy in aerospace industry and perfect school for companies, engineers and cadets of the IRIAF.
 
Maybe 20 millions is a lot of money at first. But if IRIAF buys two squadrons for secondary bases like Konarak or Masshad you have a digital light multirole fighter capable of CAS and CAP with literally thousands of flyable hours, two engines and with a lot of communality with F5, from hangars to electric starters, ladders, tools and procedures. Kowsar can replace easily chinese F7M and Mirage F1.

Offcourse, if you consider the plane's capabilities for a light fighter, it's highly advanced, like I said its FA-50, FCK-1 C/D and even exceeds them in certain aspects. If IRIAF was serious they could have dismantled the entire F-5A/E/F/R fleet to create a repository of parts, spares and re-build a 120 x airframe strong fleet of Kowsars to fly within the IADS for CAP and motherships for drones. They could have ended the logistics nightmare that are MF-1 and F-7N.

The question is, was it a wise decision to make this fighter this much modernized that upsetted its cost ?

IMO IRIAF would be very well served with 48 Kowsar and 48 Su-35.

68 SU-35S + 12 SU-30SM
22 MIG-29 SMT
42 F-14A/AM
70 Kowsar-I
12 YAK-130

Thats a good package but it seems F-14A/AM fleet will be gone because of high operating costs.

Many countries are retiring from service F5 not for being obsolete they do It because the end of the life of their airframe.

Iran probably has the worlds largest F-5 ecosystem for brand new to extensive rebuilding facilities including new turbojets and avionics etc. If they keep the plane upgraded/modernized to a point that it's effectively playing its role in IADS then whats the harm in keeping it? Re-inventing the wheel with new aerodynamics or relying upon other countries for engines, radars, missiles, PGMs is a strategic suicide in modern times.

The problem it is when someone give them a paper that it is not suitable for (like air superiority).

Stupid posters with ZERO knowledge of aviation do that comparing it with SU-35S, F-14AM, MIG-29SMT and what not lol, its a light CAP fighter with more inclination towards being a dedicated e-warfare platform. Its role is to allow the IADS to breathe while heavier fighters can look after the periphery of the IADS.

But for CAS in Sistan Baluchestan and CAP for any renegade civil aircraft or drone it is more than good. And finally keeps national autonomy in aerospace industry and perfect school for companies, engineers and cadets of the IRIAF.

good points, also keep in mind the arming of allies in the future. Let's say Iran provides (Syria? Yemen? Iraq?) a joint deal of the following weapons to create FABs against joint ememies:

- 4 x Bavar-373 HIMAD batteries
- 4 x Majid HOBS SHORAD
- 48 x Kowsar-I
- 100 x jet powered Karrar armed with HOBS, IRST
- 40 x MALE KAMAN-22/Shahed-171 Flying wings
- 30 each of Fattah HGVs, Paveh LACM, Ghader AShCM.

Suddenly the airspace is secured and the area becomes highly armed to the point that now enemy will think twice about entering this zone or have to increase the budget. Smart leadership will see this aspect of future wars in the region.
 
I have indeed read his analysis. And if your figure of $20M per Kowsar is correct it is no wonder that this poject is DOA.

Why would Iran’s decision makers (in Tehran) spend $20M per plane on an upgraded F-5 when according to estimates an SU-35 costs between 15-20M and is a tested plane in service all around the world.

$20M is way too expensive for a domestic project given the capabilities of Kowsar is mostly internal and not design related.
Incorrect as always. Shallow and dim take.
 
Babak Taghvaee said that brand new built from scratch Kowsar without armaments or depot spares costs around 10 Million USD which makes sense, its composite built airframe with FBW and is extensively heavier on the avionics side. One that is rebuilt like Mirage "KFIR" program, costs 7.5 million USD with new OWJ engines, FBW, new wings, tails, radomes etc. The slides that showed its specs mentioned same costs I think.

Now if you add a combat suite of local AIM-7 + Azaraksh HOBS for WVR, few SDB PGMs that we have seen on its wings in the assembly line or the ECM pods then yes the cost goes up to 17 Million USD. The head of SAIRAN openly talked of installing 360 deg covering HMD (might be slaved to HOBS) and AESA radar on "Domestic fighters". His words seemed to be true considering the recently seen HMD in Dowran upgraded F-4E/D during Esfahan Gunnary exercises. So yes the cost touches 20 Million.



F-5 means nothing when a capability-wise plane comes in the category or even exceeds the likes of FCK-1 or FA-50. The problem lies in the mentality of leadership. They wanted a light CAP fighter so they tasked the HESA to put as much cheese on the top as possible but refused to cover the cost when the plane was ready so is Reza correct in saying that this much extensive modernization was not needed when simple Brazilian F-5M like program could have been more feasible? I feel he is kinda right because high tech Kowsar is now sitting on the assembly line because of20 Million USD tag while a lower-grade F-5M like program costing 5-8 million USD per airframe could have been much more feasible.

Comparing Kowsar with SU-35S is like comparing Dezful missile with Sejjil. Different roles and duties so cant be compared. But for the sake of argument, just the airframe of SU-35S costs 45 Million USD, one that comes with depot spares, WVR, PGMS, Khibiny, R73/77/37, KH-31/58 will cost around 85 million USD easily. Indian SU-30MKI costs 65 million USD and is much downgraded than SU-35S so one can assume what Iran is paying.

https://bulgarianmilitary.com/2024/...-expanding-su-35-sales-on-global-arms-market/



20 Million price tag is not bad for this much capability considering this is a 100 % domestic program so you can build as many with local parts, and armaments as possible. The point Reza is raising, was this much modernisation even needed. Are IRIAF officials stupid or they were expecting leadership to increase the IRIAF budget by 5 folds in coming years?

Kowsar-page-0003.jpg


My concern is that considering IRIAF is the weakest force among Iranian branches, is the decision-making even rational among its big wigs?
Emirzad, where did you see the HMD in Dowran? New Helmet similar to HGU-55/P yes... but HMD?
 
Comparing Kowsar with SU-35S is like comparing Dezful missile with Sejjil. Different roles and duties so cant be compared. But for the sake of argument, just the airframe of SU-35S costs 45 Million USD, one that comes with depot spares, WVR, PGMS, Khibiny, R73/77/37, KH-31/58 will cost around 85 million USD easily. Indian SU-30MKI costs 65 million USD and is much downgraded than SU-35S so one can assume what Iran is paying.

My comparison to SU-35 was in relation to need. For example, imagine if instead of Bavar 373, iran spent 10 years trying to replicate Pantsir or Iron Dome, what use would a SHORAD be when a country lacks LR defense system? So in that line of thinking what use would a $20M F-5 be for a country that lacks a proper interceptor?

F-5 at $20M is expensive for a country like Iran that lacks a suitable interceptor. So Iran’s focus should first be on building interceptor then moving to more speciality aircraft.

If BT is correct a $10M tag for a semi modernized F-5 is a much more digestible price tag than the $20M for the ‘fully loaded’ version. Originally the F-5 was created to sell a cheap plane to banana countries, so for Iran to make it to an semi-expensive fighter goes against its initial creation idea in 60’s

I always saw this plane as an Advanced Trainer + CAS + fighter of last resort while Iran tried to replace it as a bulk of fleet fighter jet which didn’t make sense.


My concern is that considering IRIAF is the weakest force among Iranian branches, is the decision-making even rational among its big wigs?

Well IRGC a has historically been anti Air Force and they get the Lion share of the budget and have the leader’s ear. So barring a major shift in thinking or a decision from leader himself to rebuild the force, things are looking grim in near future. But several years ago IRGC announced they were building their own fighter jet. Supposedly the thinking goes they learned lessons from Russian CAS on Syrian war and wanted to create their own CAS fighter.

Then radio silence.
 
My comparison to SU-35 was in relation to need. For example, imagine if instead of Bavar 373, iran spent 10 years trying to replicate Pantsir or Iron Dome, what use would a SHORAD be when a country lacks LR defense system? So in that line of thinking what use would a $20M F-5 be for a country that lacks a proper interceptor?

Every country on earth is purchasing or developing a modernized light CAP fighter so Kowsar fits that criteria, SU-35S is a replacement for F-14A's long interception capabilities which are not even that much-needed anymore, it has no other purpose. Comparing these two is just illogical.

Besides, calling Kowsar and F-5 is a non-technical mindset. Capability-wise, the plane rivals FCK-1 C/D or FA-50 if fully armed, we can make a head-to-head comparison. You are getting confused by only focusing on its aerodynamics, which was very important in the 1970s, but in today's world, avionics, nav-communication, weapons matter, nothing else.

F-5 at $20M is expensive for a country like Iran that lacks a suitable interceptor. So Iran’s focus should first be on building interceptor then moving to more speciality aircraft.

No country outside US, USSR has ever developed an indigenous long range interceptor plane. How many such planes even existed? F-14, MIG-25/31, then the world moved towards multirole fighters. Even if by some miracle Iran produces a long range interceptor at home, who would be doing light CAPs? So a light CAP fighter was needed but because of its heavy modernization the cost went up and the assembly line got stuck. That Reza's theory and I agree because some of the capabilities they showed were probably not needed if the role is just CAP around IADS assets. Why would they need Rear and FL-RWR ? why additional ECM when radar itself has built-in ECM ? why load the nose with 4 separate management computers including separate ones for A2A and A2G attacks? such a light airframe did not need FBW .... list goes on and on. They could have just gotten a new radar with local ARH BVR + HOBs and be done with it like Brazilian F-5M.

I think what really happened was leadership (MODAFL) at IRGC's behest fooled the airforce that they would get the money for this project, 80 such planes even at 20 Million tag would have costed like 2 BLN USD so if the budget of IRIAF was doubled then they could have afforded the plane but budget instead got halved (IRGC's budget increased) and plane is no longer affordable while IRGC is flying HGVs and MaRVs over Israeli air space for fun.

If BT is correct a $10M tag for a semi modernized F-5 is a much more digestible price tag than the $20M for the ‘fully loaded’ version. Originally the F-5 was created to sell a cheap plane to banana countries, so for Iran to make it to an semi-expensive fighter goes against its initial creation idea in 60’s

You are making the same mistake again because you are too caught up in aerodynamics, which is obsolete thinking. Extensive upgrades/modernizations change roles of planes. MIG-25 was built as a high altitutde interceptor to stop XB-70 but its upgraded form MIG-31 (same aerodynamics, size etc) is now launching hypersonic ALBM. Kowsar because of its strong modern avionics or combat suite can perform the job of IADS-integrated-CAP which F-5E/F with their APQ-153/159 (32 KM track range) could not even think of. Its a different plane with different capabilities. If IRIAF is smart, they could have created integrated localized CAP battle groups of 5 x Kowsars with 10 x Karrars and KAMAN-22/Shahed-171 providing Jamming/ELINT role, flying under the umbrella provided by Bavar/S-300 at ground and F-14,SU35, MIG-29 providing higher altitude coverage. Just because you see an F-5 aerodynamics does not mean its an F-5 just like MIG-31BM launching R-33/37 and Khinzal in 2024 is not MIG-25 of 1972 launching R-23 from 20 KM away. Tech changes roles.

I always saw this plane as an Advanced Trainer + CAS + fighter of last resort while Iran tried to replace it as a bulk of fleet fighter jet which didn’t make sense.

Which advanced trainer in the entire world has datalinking with IADS, 3 axis FBW, 4 management weapons computers, 6 MFDS, TWS Radar tracking an F-16 at 100+ KM with ECCM, can cruise at 0.9 Mach, touch 1.6 M, climb at 35K ft/min?

Its a light CAP fighter that can stop an intruder from within IADS, that's its role. It does not have energy because of its small thrust to do the job of F-14AM, SU-35S or MIG-29SMT. For that it needs 38K lbs thrust to come out and return to the periphery of IADS like what a MIG-29 can do right now but without that, its just a light CAP, advanced one though.

Well IRGC a has historically been anti Air Force and they get the Lion share of the budget and have the leader’s ear. So barring a major shift in thinking or a decision from leader himself to rebuild the force, things are looking grim in near future. But several years ago IRGC announced they were building their own fighter jet. Supposedly the thinking goes they learned lessons from Russian CAS on Syrian war and wanted to create their own CAS fighter.

Then radio silence.

IRGC has lost interest in combat aviation IMO. SU-22M3/M4 upgradation was a marvel, the plan can launch 1000+ KM ranging CM, all types of modern PGMs, ALBMs, can datalink with drones etc but only 1 squadron was built when you have 44 airframes just lying around? I think they see no utility in having fighters because Iranian missile muscle has gone too big, Israeli air force can't reach Iran, and Persian Gulf Arabs will get their airbases turned into dust if they decide to go head-on against Iran so IRGC sees no use of combat aviation anymore. Mind you IRGC is run by battle-hardened ground soldiers like Salami, Ghani, Bagheri etc these people are inherently anti-AF all over the world, they want Airdefence batteries and missiles for offense while the rest is all HUMINT-based operations.

All in all I see IRIAF's funding even decreased to the point that they would one day be operating only few squadrons of SU-35S (may be 3-4) on QRA duties with Yak-130 as trainers, all this local eco system, capabilities that aviation sector built over the time will be gone because Reza's theory of Overly ambitious programs of converting F-5E into F-16 Block 40, converting F-4E/D into F-15C etc which having no budget approved and thats my point as well. IRIAF is stupid, IRGC is not.
 
For those interested, this is what Kowsar Fighter is. It was built to replace F-5, F-7, Mirage F1 in IRIAF as a light CAP or some may say as a highly capable LIFT/AT. The plane's cost has gone out of control (~20 Million USD) because of overly ambitious "Not needed" modernizations so IRIAF were either dumb from the beginning or they were fooled by leadership that they will get money but they did not.

Kowsar-page-0003.jpg


Kowsar_page-0001.jpg

Kowsar_page-0002.jpg

Kowsar_page-0004.jpg

Kowsar_page-0012.jpg

Kowsar_page-0007.jpg

Kowsar_page-0010.jpg
 
For those interested, this is what Kowsar Fighter is. It was built to replace F-5, F-7, Mirage F1 in IRIAF as a light CAP or some may say as a highly capable LIFT/AT. The plane's cost has gone out of control (~20 Million USD) because of overly ambitious "Not needed" modernizations so IRIAF were either dumb from the beginning or they were fooled by leadership that they will get money but they did not.

Kowsar-page-0003.jpg


View attachment 71046

View attachment 71048

View attachment 71049

View attachment 71050

View attachment 71051

View attachment 71052
Very nice post.

I liked in particular the idea of 2 x newly built OWJ turbofans - 7 000 - 10 000lbf.
This means that production means for the legacy engine already exist in Iran.

Regardless of how many components are sourced from outside.

From there, in time, it will be a smaller step to upgrade to what ... a JF-17C Thunder (Block 3), and perhaps Tejas Mk1A analogue Kowsar.

Just depends on the $$$ of course.

Piet.
 
Very nice post.

I liked in particular the idea of 2 x newly built OWJ turbofans - 7 000 - 10 000lbf.
This means that production means for the legacy engine already exist in Iran.

Regardless of how many components are sourced from outside.

From there, in time, it will be a smaller step to upgrade to what ... a JF-17C Thunder (Block 3), and perhaps Tejas Mk1A analogue Kowsar.

Just depends on the $$$ of course.

Piet.

Yes, but the approach is totally different, in modern times of wars and conflicts Iran can't afford to rely upon any foriegn provider for its domestic programs. This is how our missile or air defense, drones muscle got built because of "Absolute Indigenousization".

I mean we can make a build-a-bear fighter jet by begging Russia/China/EU for engines, radars, avionics, missiles, etc to assemble them from imported CKD at home and then suddenly find ourselves not getting those parts because someone put sanctions on supply or we find that entire patents of every component are owned by someone else so Iran is basically paying 20 Million USD a unit to companies abroad for a Light CAP while presenting it as a "Local fighter".

Sometimes I think leadership is right, manned combat aviation is an obsolete doctrine anyways atleast for Iran because of our large terrain and no actual enemy at the gate. This is why 3rd world client states with shit debted economies keep on getting fighters, tanks, and ships from the Western world while strategic armaments are kept far from their reach because the West knows these conventional weapons make no difference in warfare and these poor countries will keep on running western industrial complex with their debted GDPs.

"Absolute Indigenousization" of every strategic weapon is the key to break this cycle, zero dependency on outside world. We were fooled by Russia in MIg-29 and MIG-31 deal in 1990s when payments were already made for 72 + 24 (96) fighters and we got 20 MIG-29 out of them, same story repeated in S-300PMU2/S-400 saga. If we do not learn from past then we deserve to be beaten back to stone age.
 
Babak Taghvaee said that brand new built from scratch Kowsar without armaments or depot spares costs around 10 Million USD which makes sense, its composite built airframe with FBW and is extensively heavier on the avionics side. One that is rebuilt like Mirage "KFIR" program, costs 7.5 million USD with new OWJ engines, FBW, new wings, tails, radomes etc. The slides that showed its specs mentioned same costs I think.

Now if you add a combat suite of local AIM-7 + Azaraksh HOBS for WVR, few SDB PGMs that we have seen on its wings in the assembly line or the ECM pods then yes the cost goes up to 17 Million USD. The head of SAIRAN openly talked of installing 360 deg covering HMD (might be slaved to HOBS) and AESA radar on "Domestic fighters". His words seemed to be true considering the recently seen HMD in Dowran upgraded F-4E/D during Esfahan Gunnary exercises. So yes the cost touches 20 Million.
Noting the Mirage "Kfir" program, compare the early Mirage 111CZ's to the much later Cheetah C. Although this is of course not a universal applicable standard, it shows what can be done given the right commitment and of course the necessary funds.
F-5 means nothing when a capability-wise plane comes in the category or even exceeds the likes of FCK-1 or FA-50. The problem lies in the mentality of leadership. They wanted a light CAP fighter so they tasked the HESA to put as much cheese on the top as possible but refused to cover the cost when the plane was ready so is Reza correct in saying that this much extensive modernization was not needed when simple Brazilian F-5M like program could have been more feasible? I feel he is kinda right because high tech Kowsar is now sitting on the assembly line because of20 Million USD tag while a lower-grade F-5M like program costing 5-8 million USD per airframe could have been much more feasible.

Comparing Kowsar with SU-35S is like comparing Dezful missile with Sejjil. Different roles and duties so cant be compared. But for the sake of argument, just the airframe of SU-35S costs 45 Million USD, one that comes with depot spares, WVR, PGMS, Khibiny, R73/77/37, KH-31/58 will cost around 85 million USD easily. Indian SU-30MKI costs 65 million USD and is much downgraded than SU-35S so one can assume what Iran is paying.

https://bulgarianmilitary.com/2024/...-expanding-su-35-sales-on-global-arms-market/



20 Million price tag is not bad for this much capability considering this is a 100 % domestic program so you can build as many with local parts, and armaments as possible. The point Reza is raising, was this much modernisation even needed. Are IRIAF officials stupid or they were expecting leadership to increase the IRIAF budget by 5 folds in coming years?

Kowsar-page-0003.jpg


My concern is that considering IRIAF is the weakest force among Iranian branches, is the decision-making even rational among its big wigs?
 
Noting the Mirage "Kfir" program, compare the early Mirage 111CZ's to the much later Cheetah C. Although this is of course not a universal applicable standard, it shows what can be done given the right commitment and of course the necessary funds.

Offcourse, such upgradations change the capabilities and roles of combat platforms so drastically that the entire force's doctrines can be changed.

Imagine someone gets brand new 250 x Kfir block 60/NG with its marketed Elta-AESA, HOTAS, INS/SAT/D-Links, HMD Slaved Pythons, Derby etc. Simpletons will say oh its a Mirage III but in reality, it can probably even beat a Mirage-2000-9 to shreds in a fight.

Upgradations/modernisations change everything.

I dont know much about cheetah program except that SAAF experimented with Mirage airframes lots. I think MirageF1C was even fitted with RD-33 at one point.
 
I mean we can make a build-a-bear fighter jet by begging Russia/China/EU for engines, radars, avionics, missiles, etc to assemble them from imported CKD at home and then suddenly find ourselves not getting those parts because someone put sanctions on supply or we find that entire patents of every component are owned by someone else so Iran is basically paying 20 Million USD a unit to companies abroad for a Light CAP while presenting it as a "Local fighter".
Yes. The only positive here is to stay away from foreign suppliers. Such as Russia and China even. This of course excludes off-the shelf items. Such as the AMD processors for one of Iran's early High Performance Computers for instance... .

Sometimes I think leadership is right, manned combat aviation is an obsolete doctrine anyways atleast for Iran because of our large terrain and no actual enemy at the gate. This is why 3rd world client states with shit debted economies keep on getting fighters, tanks, and ships from the Western world while strategic armaments are kept far from their reach because the West knows these conventional weapons make no difference in warfare and these poor countries will keep on running western industrial complex with their debted GDPs.
While selling hot-cake items such as F-16 and -35, Rafale, Gripen and Typhoon,

"Absolute Indigenousization" of every strategic weapon is the key to break this cycle, zero dependency on outside world. We were fooled by Russia in MIg-29 and MIG-31 deal in 1990s when payments were already made for 72 + 24 (96) fighters and we got 20 MIG-29 out of them, same story repeated in S-300PMU2/S-400 saga. If we do not learn from past then we deserve to be beaten back to stone age.
Frankly, one can only hope that Iran's executive and military top echelons have learned from this, and does not repeat history again.
 
Yes. The only positive here is to stay away from foreign suppliers. Such as Russia and China even. This of course excludes off-the shelf items. Such as the AMD processors for one of Iran's early High Performance Computers for instance... .

Everyone looks for their own in the end. In foriegn policy there are no friends esp the ones that are drastically different from you in culture and origin.

While selling hot-cake items such as F-16 and -35, Rafale, Gripen and Typhoon,

What would make a difference to a country's defense doctrine?

100 tyfoons+300 Abrams or completely local industry manufacturing HGVs, MRBMS, HIMADS, MALE UCAVs?

Frankly, one can only hope that Iran's executive and military top echelons have learned from this, and does not repeat history again.

Our problem is that our entire military top brass is built of ground soldiers turned Generals who started their careers in 80s decade-long war. These people do not believe in "tech" in conflict that much. Moreover, they are highly result-oriented.

Look at the Iran-Israel overall conflict, Israel has tech and $$$ at its disposal yet despite all of this its now the most hated/despised entity in the region while Iran has deeply entrenched clenches in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, Palestine, so in bigger picture all those F-15, F-35s lost to ground soldiers of Iran. With every single airstrike in Syria etc, the public and the country gets more hateful of Israel and comes closer to Iran. This is something that people usually do not understand. 500 Kowsars and 300 F-14 will not give Iran what IRGC is doing on ground in these countries. Now even tech-wise they are being beaten where Iran is violating their "sacred" airspace at will with its assets. So may be somewhere, the leadership of Iran is wiser than all of us here counting KMs on radar antennas.
 

Kuwaiti F18 fighter jet crashes during training mission, pilot killed​

download.webp

I didn't know that Kuwait had F-18 in their inventory. The threat of Growler version of this fighter jet is one of the most dangerous and serious threats to our AD and fighter jets that always concerns me, esp given its outstanding EW capabilities.

Glad to see that its already present in our neghbouring country as small as Kuwait which is easy to study its radar features.

Even if its old version of F-18 family, what matters is, we have already studied its aerodynamic features beside its weapon systems and their appearance on radar scope.

RIP to the pilot.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top