Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

[Awwad]

Israel's ideal scenario is that Iran backs away OR even if Iran fires some missiles then all of which are all intercepted and do no damage.

What Iran wants is to do an attack which goes non-intercepted and do some damage, but not too much that would pressure Israel to re-attack. Something like what Iran did after assassination of Qasim Solemani. It was not escalated any further.

 

[Immortals]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Immortals]

My two cents

Iran will not retaliate now, they are right now putting Israel on high alert with some kind of trolling "it's imminent"

Iran will retaliate at the best moment possible on a rainy day, but definitely Israel cannot bomb consulates and get away with it

Right now there is $14B aid bill for Israel stuck in Congress. An Iranian strike would get that approved immediately.

So either way Israel will be happy with an Iranian strike. They get $14B and they know Iran has to pick it’s target extremely carefully. So for Israel it’s a win win situation.

At this point it’s clear Iran boxed itself into a corner that it doesn’t want to be in. All these leaks and bravado statements warning of the Revenge attack does is increase hype for what undoubtedly will be a underwhelming Iranian response.

 

[Fasbre2]

I believe a retaliatory strike in the same vein would be an appropriate response without too much escalation. Hit Israeli embassy in UAE / Dubai.. Iran would receive overwhelming support from Muslims all over the world.. maybe not the corrupt rulers though..

 

[jauk]

Right now there is $14B aid bill for Israel stuck in Congress. An Iranian strike would get that approved immediately.

So either way Israel will be happy with an Iranian strike. They get $14B and they know Iran has to pick it’s target extremely carefully. So for Israel it’s a win win situation.

At this point it’s clear Iran boxed itself into a corner that it doesn’t want to be in. All these leaks and bravado statements warning of the Revenge attack does is increase hype for what undoubtedly will be a underwhelming Iranian response.

Hmmm. So if Iran doesn’t attack it won’t be approved? Meaningful precedent?

 

[tsunset]

I believe a retaliatory strike in the same vein would be an appropriate response without too much escalation. Hit Israeli embassy in UAE / Dubai.. Iran would receive overwhelming support from Muslims all over the world.. maybe not the corrupt rulers though..

It is completely unmoral, unethical, in violation of every possible laws to do this, Iran wants good ties with the UAE and Saudis

This would put us at the same level of Zionists, but they will have a massive PR advantage to paint that as an "unga bunga Iran agression outlaw" in the west

Emiratis or Indian workers are not the targets, hangars are

 

[jauk]

Frankly, the retaliatory scenarios envisioned here are childish and lacking creativity.

The creativity and dare Iranians displayed and executed during the Holy Defense were epic.

That still exists. I hope.

 

[Mehdipersian]

Frankly, the retaliatory scenarios envisioned here are childish and lacking creativity.

The creativity and dare Iranians displayed and executed during the Holy Defense were epic.

That still exists. I hope.

Today is the time for our generation to shine.

War, war until victory
جنگ ، جنگ، تا پیروزی

 

[Nuffle]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Iranian Foreign Minister Abdullahian wrote on X media:

"In response to telephone calls from German Foreign Minister Baerbock, British Foreign Minister Cameron and Australian Foreign Minister Wong as they exchanged views on some bilateral issues, I emphasized that when the Zionist regime violates international law and the Conventions of Vienna violates the immunity of diplomatic persons and places, and the Security Council is unable to issue a statement condemning the terrorist attack on the Iranian embassy in Damascus, legitimate defense with the aim of punishing the aggressor is a necessity.

Next, I emphasized the need to declare a clear position of the three countries mentioned in condemning this terrorist crime of the Israeli regime.

I have stated that Iran does not intend to expand the scope of the war, but the return of stable security in the sensitive region of West Asia is linked to the containment of the warlike and unbalanced leaders of the Zionist regime and the permanent cessation of war crimes. by this regime against Gaza and the West Bank."

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

From the exercises carried out yesterday, Iran shows the power of the Iranian kamikaze drone.

 

[Nuffle]

Hmmm. So if Iran doesn’t attack it won’t be approved? Meaningful precedent?

How do you think Iran will respond and when? Any imagination here?

 

[Fasbre2]

It is completely unmoral, unethical, in violation of every possible laws to do this, Iran wants good ties with the UAE and Saudis

This would put us at the same level of Zionists, but they will have a massive PR advantage to paint that as an "unga bunga Iran agression outlaw" in the west

Emiratis or Indian workers are not the targets, hangars are

Attack on israeli interests in UAE would not be an attack on UAE. You are attacking Zionist interests embassy not UAE.. and would be retaliation in kind as it western countries are asking Iran not to attack Israel but have said nothing about attacking Israeli embassies etc. elsewhere..

 

[tsunset]

How do you think Iran will respond and when? Any imagination here?

We are not military experts or tacticians and politicians with decades of experience on the field, most of us and this forum don't have any diploms in engineering or in the army as tacticians and decision making

All we know is that the settings for retaliating here is a hard one, and this is certainly not us that will think of the right one

 

[Persian Gulf]

Do you know how many satellites, listening devices, drone/surveillance flights and god knows what else governments have built in the years since that are monitoring Iran and Iranian communications 24/7?

No one will be Suprised. Israel and America have been preparing. All that is happening the longer Iran take’s is the other side get their assets and coordination efforts aligned. Maybe one can argue that Iran is doing the same, it is unifying it’s military structure and preparing its defensive forces in case things escalate after Iranian response.

this exact topic came up in an interview with Hajizadeh after operation martyr Soleimani

Hajizadeh said only a very small circle of Iranians (up to 8 in total) knew about Iran's plans to retaliate and the plans even changed the day before the strike

so they can think of likely options and detect some hints but I don't think any Israeli or American knows what the precise strike will consist of

 

[Immortals]

Hmmm. So if Iran doesn’t attack it won’t be approved? Meaningful precedent?

It will eventually be approved in some fashion (maybe with changes). However, due to Israeli genocide in Gaza and bad press, US has image issue approving it. Plus it’s the only card US has left as leverage against Bibi.

However an attack by Iran will force a “rally around Israel” and Bibi will get his $14B instantly.

So you can see why he is more than happy to have Iran do a “measured” response on Israeli soil. Bibi gets free reign to strike Iran (if he wants), draws in more US military support, gets $14B dollars in aid, and has Iran distract from the ongoing genocide.

 

[RescueRanger]

Just now - Heavy Lift around Israel -

---

US restricts travel for staff in Israel​

The United States has restricted its employees in Israel and their family members from personal travel outside the greater Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and Beersheba areas amid Iran’s threats to retaliate over Israel’s April 1 air strike on its embassy compound in Damascus.

The Israeli attack killed seven members of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), including two generals.

Asked about the security alert at a press briefing, US Department of State spokesperson Matthew Miller said, “We conduct ongoing assessments all the time about the situation on the ground.”

“I’m not going to speak to the specific assessments that led to us to restrict our employees’ and family members’ personal travel,” Miller said, “but clearly we are monitoring the threat environment in the Middle East and specifically in Israel.”

---

---