Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

[Snake]

And how many regime changes have we had despite having nukes supposedly under our control?

Brother, don't shift goal posts. We can do that to infinity. Iraq, Libya have been in chaos since invasion.

 

[vmro]

What oppurtunities? Azeri Turks quite literally ruled Iran for more or less a millennia give or take, and basically created the modern state of Iran.

Azeri Turks as term is bit confusing... Yes, they shared same language officially in their states, Persian, but that was more because factual reality...For majority of state`s apparatus officials in w.Asia, Persian was their primary language, documents were on their language, for all those empires...But sharing same language is not main determination, because language implementation can be achieved on different ways... Azeris never saw themselves as part of Turkish(Ottoman) state..

 

[tsunset]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[925boy]

The U.S. Empire may be straining, but history shows predicting when an empire will “collapse” is a fools errand. US Empire could collapse in 10 years or 100 years or 1000 years. No one knows.

But it will still collapse right? And yes, we can't predict when it will collapse, but from the indications we are getting, it will be sooner rather than later, doesn't seem it will take more than 10-20 years, because the US empire is in trouble NOW.

And it’s only mighty challenger: China has a rapidly aging population, lack of babies being born, lack of immigration, its bond yields are rapidly falling due to deflationary concerns, its population is hoarding cash, and it has a huge real estate debt that it’s working thru. The Yuan is becoming more volatile. China looks more like Japan in 1990 than a mighty power poised to dethrone the U.S.

Why can't it be a coalition of multi-polar believing countries to take down the US hegemon? It could be a China-Russia-Iran-NK alliance that takes down the US empire, not necessarily only China.

But the issues you highlight that China has- aging population, lack of babies being born, bond yield etc, US has ALL THOSE SAME problems- US's economic fundamentals and future doesnt seem as solid as China's today-focusing on foreign adversaries issues wont make US's issues improve or go away.

So Plus explain how BRICS can position alternative currency? Russia and Brazil currencies are doing awful. China has strict capital controls and has a peg on its currency which stops any BRICS currency dead in its waters. India and China are major rivals and India would never use a floating Yuan as its reserve currency.

Simply by not using the dollar as much- USD is backed by nothing, US is low productivity for a developed nation, it exports inflation to other countries, and is a global financial bully- the USD is already struggling as fewer countries use it for international trade.
Can you show me some stats proving the Ruble is doing awful? USD is also doing awful despite looking like its "strengthening"- its just hidden in the ever increasing and unsustainable US national debt- which will still have to be paid or reconciled somehow- that will HURT (and US is the one that will take 90% of that beating, no one else knows what that will feel like cuz no other country is in that MUCH debt relative to their GDP).

So the idea BRICS can position an alternative currency is from people who don’t understand basic economics. Trump being one of those people.

Doesn't matter- Trump threatened BRICS already, just like Gaddafi threatened US (Hilary emails) with the idea of a unified African currency backed by Gold- you dont realize how powerful ideas are? Every game changing situation or currency or technology starts with an idea, but once its takes off, its hard to stop- look at crypto currency today- its definitely mainstreaming more and more. If the future US president/Trump is making threats, that says alot about the confidence and strength(lack of) of the dollar .

The best BRICS can currently do is trade in their local Currencies for major deals, maybe crypto as well, and hoard gold to prop up their fiat currencies if one day EURO/Dollar go into the toilet.

and this local currency trading is already damaging the USD, thats why US has experienced never-seen-before inflation and debt over the past few years like its never seen before. US GOvt NEEDS the world to trade and trade more IN USD for the USD to stay afloat, simple as that, and that is under threat.

If the USD was that strong, these local currency trading, and crypto use wouldn't be perceived as threats by the US govt.

 

[925boy]

Pakistan is too far from US interests in West Asia and Israel, and does not interfere in that area. so they mostly leave you alone

False- US interfered in Pakistan by paying $300M to Pakistan's parliament to remove IK and install a puppet favorable to it, so wtf you mean???? Israel isn't US's only interest, US has interests all over the world, for different purposes obviously, but Pakistan is definitely a US "interest"

. if you start to sell weapons to groups that fight Israel, that will change very quickly

Or if Pakistan starts doing trade with sanctioned Iran like IPI gas pipeline, or local currency trading, or joint military maneuvers, OR oil and gas deals with Russia etc. - there are so many things US does not want Pakistan doing, and Pakistan, while under a US puppet, doesn't do them.

 

[925boy]

What's happening in Afghanistan is big cause of concern, it seems like international agencies are at work.

Agreed.

Iran Taliban having water issues, Pakistan Taliban having border/terrorism issues, the rise of ISIS is a threat to all neighbours,

yea

wonder who funds and trains ISIS.

US and NATO (and Turkey is one of the designated partners/hubs for managing ISIS for NATO and US).

To me this all seems either Iran or Pakistan is next,

Lol- lets see the military buildup for this happen- the military logistics (soldiers, weapons and ammunition) are daunting, expensive and demanding, and NATO and US don't have the right logistics in places, primarily because they've over-invested in the Ukraine war and that's not going well for them now.

i would assume its Iran since Iran big influence in middleeast harming Israeli interests but it's possible to hit 2 birds with 1 stone.

Then lets see NATO and US "work " Iran- we see US and NATO banding up together with Israel but still struggling against Houthis.

US is the most afraid today despite what you all think- because it is afraid to put boots on the ground- its afraid to put serious ground soldier boots (i mean at least 10s of thousands and up, not a few hundred) on the ground today in Israel, Ukraine, Russia, Lebanon, Iran and Yemen, which means, it is aware it is not prepared to fight those countries in full blown conflicts.

These comments above are based on my observations and not based on intentional bias.

 

[Persian Gulf]

False- US interfered in Pakistan by paying $300M to Pakistan's parliament to remove IK and install a puppet favorable to it, so wtf you mean???? Israel isn't US's only interest, US has interests all over the world, for different purposes obviously, but Pakistan is definitely a US "interest"

Pakistan does not interfere with the US' interests. I didn't say the US doesn't interfere with Pakistan's interests.

In any event, this discussion is off topic.

 

[Mr Iran Eye]

Commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Hossein Salami:

○ “Our defensive capabilities are strong and we are ready to confront any threat and our hand is on the trigger.”

○ “The Israelis are killers, not fighters, and they are weaker politically and economically than last year.”

○ “Yemen’s missiles hit their targets in Israel despite the buildup of air defense systems in that country.”

○ “Our people demand that we carry out Operation True Promise 3 and we will not let their passion for seeking justice fade.”

○ “After we left Syria, the Zionist entity destroyed its defensive infrastructure.”

○ “We will reveal the cities of missiles and drones to show the hidden side of our country’s strength and greatness.” »

○ “Israel is a stain on the world and depends on direct support from the United States.”

○ “The United States and Britain have been unable to confront Yemeni armed forces in the Red Sea.”

 

[PakAl]

Lol- lets see the military buildup for this happen- the military logistics (soldiers, weapons and ammunition) are daunting, expensive and demanding, and NATO and US don't have the right logistics in places, primarily because they've over-invested in the Ukraine war and that's not going well for them now.

Then lets see NATO and US "work " Iran- we see US and NATO banding up together with Israel but still struggling against Houthis.

US is the most afraid today despite what you all think- because it is afraid to put boots on the ground- its afraid to put serious ground soldier boots (i mean at least 10s of thousands and up, not a few hundred) on the ground today in Israel, Ukraine, Russia, Lebanon, Iran and Yemen, which means, it is aware it is not prepared to fight those countries in full blown conflicts.

These comments above are based on my observations and not based on intentional bias.

Lol- lets see the military buildup for this happen- the military logistics (soldiers, weapons and ammunition) are daunting, expensive and demanding, and NATO and US don't have the right logistics in places, primarily because they've over-invested in the Ukraine war and that's not going well for them now.

Then lets see NATO and US "work " Iran- we see US and NATO banding up together with Israel but still struggling against Houthis.

US is the most afraid today despite what you all think- because it is afraid to put boots on the ground- its afraid to put serious ground soldier boots (i mean at least 10s of thousands and up, not a few hundred) on the ground today in Israel, Ukraine, Russia, Lebanon, Iran and Yemen, which means, it is aware it is not prepared to fight those countries in full blown conflicts.

These comments above are based on my observations and not based on intentional bias.

I respect your observations but some people underestimate the Usa, it has EU, GCC and quad as allies. Usa will not place boots in Afghanistan but they are trying to create a rebel force which can harm Iran and Pakistan, destabilise the region for decades. People thought the same about Syria and look how they played a bigger game. I am not saying it will be successful but the threat is there.

 

[925boy]

Pakistan and Iran need to align their interests first. NRF is no threat to Iran but hates Pakistan, Taliban is 50 50 with Pakistan but not really good with Iran Tajikistan and others. If Pakistan Iran China and other neighbours agree to finish NRF and the Taliban, bring new Leadership and movement for a united Afghanistan movement but also friendly towards all neighbours, who recognise the border and sort all issues on table.

Hmm...this is a nice plan on paper,but until we see alternative evidence, there is no Afghanistan leadership/govt without the Taliban or a Taliban-like movement, so that renders this plan impractical. This is what US and NATO foolishly and naively spent 20years worth of blood, time and resources to achieve, and they failed, so its not really possible (based on current realities).

This will work but all neighbours have own interests. Taliban looks powerful on paper but in reality it has different factions, the Kandhar faction, Haqqani Network, support of many different powers in Afghanistan, the Taliban allows them regional autonomousy with loyalty to central government and they all fine with it.

yes Taliban has different factions, but when invaders enter Afghanistan, those factions consolidate together to kick the invaders out, so that division isn't present or relevant where it matters (when foreign interests and agenda enter Afghanistan)

 

[Tijani]

no

but if anyone should be laughed at it's Trump wanting to conquer Greenland and Canada

I don't believe it's a laughing matter. The Americans will eventually take whatever the want from any of their vassalstates and no one will say or do anything substantial about it.

 

[Flotilla]

I don't believe it's a laughing matter. The Americans will eventually take whatever the want from any of their vassalstates and no one will say or do anything substantial about it.

Don't worry that much.

US lost from Corea to Afghanistan. Taking by force Greenland or even Panamá channel would align EU with even China and boost a military alliance between europeans countries at least. US needs EU even if It is just for projecting their power trough the net of US bases around.

 

[OakTree23]

And how many regime changes have we had despite having nukes supposedly under our control?

That’s because the Pakistan army is a foreign funded entity ruling Pakistan. They’re bred to do the bidding of foreigners whether A-Rabs or Westerners. The wily Indian has discovered a way to neutralize Pakistan by using UAE to influence the Crypto-Hindus ruling Pakistan.

 

[Tijani]

Don't worry that much.

US lost from Corea to Afghanistan. Taking by force Greenland or even Panamá channel would align EU with even China and boost a military alliance between europeans countries at least. US needs EU even if It is just for projecting their power trough the net of US bases around.

I hope you're right! I've been living among these so called Europeans forever and their leadership is the most coward and corrupted I've come across. They're subservient to the death! The elites are all zioinfested to the core.

 

[PakAl]

Hmm...this is a nice plan on paper,but until we see alternative evidence, there is no Afghanistan leadership/govt without the Taliban or a Taliban-like movement, so that renders this plan impractical. This is what US and NATO foolishly and naively spent 20years worth of blood, time and resources to achieve, and they failed, so its not really possible (based on current realities).

yes Taliban has different factions, but when invaders enter Afghanistan, those factions consolidate together to kick the invaders out, so that division isn't present or relevant where it matters (when foreign interests and agenda enter Afghanistan)

Usa nato failed because they were occupiers and planned to completely change the regime in Afghanistan, they wanted replace Taliban n allies with Northern Alliance puppet government. The Afghans want a religious government in place which is IEA. Another reason was Taliban used Pakistan as a sanctuary and the attacks continued for 20 years, without this Taliban is isolated.

Alternative leadership to Taliban can come from peace deal between Haqqani Network, Hizb Islami, the Northern Alliance but minus the fundamentalists of Kandahar Taliban section (if it exists as noone can confirm which section of Taliban is causing these issues ie is it the extremist elements, moderate ones or foreign pressure).