Tijani
Registered Member
Dear Musings. It seems you're being a bit hard on Jauk. His post was more humorous than insulting. I hope you and others who feels it was directed towards them takes it as such.
Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions
- Thread starter Persian Gulf
- Start date
UKBengali
Elite Member
@Persian Gulf
Following on from my previous post, I forgot one major difference from the 2020 SRBM attack on US bases in Iraq and the recent Iranian attack on the Zionist entity.
The 2020 attack followed a pure ballistic trajectory whereas now Iran is having to employ lots of techniques like manuevring warheads and late stage boost separation of warheads.
This does help in evading ABM shield but also complicates targeting accuracy as then the warhead needs to find target again and “recorrect” its trajectory again to hit the target accurately.
If this is the case for lack of accuracy(assuming this is the case for KS2) then the solution is simple -exhaust ABM interceptors and then launch modern IRBMs on purely ballistic trajectories.
Following on from my previous post, I forgot one major difference from the 2020 SRBM attack on US bases in Iraq and the recent Iranian attack on the Zionist entity.
The 2020 attack followed a pure ballistic trajectory whereas now Iran is having to employ lots of techniques like manuevring warheads and late stage boost separation of warheads.
This does help in evading ABM shield but also complicates targeting accuracy as then the warhead needs to find target again and “recorrect” its trajectory again to hit the target accurately.
If this is the case for lack of accuracy(assuming this is the case for KS2) then the solution is simple -exhaust ABM interceptors and then launch modern IRBMs on purely ballistic trajectories.
Last edited:
Musings
Administrator
Bro
It’s a continuous attack on a specific moderator. It’s the build up and accumulation of several posts. Based on just that post I would agree but I have to look at the last couple of months - hoping you understand
Mr Iran Eye
Registered Member
We don't care about the moderator label, the important thing is the forum charter that I read and Persian Golf, Hack-Hook, and other moderators and administrators follow it even. I have a forum, page and Facebook group moderator and I still am and a charter and rule must also be followed by administrators and moderators because the abuse of power happens very quickly and big egos take their place.
Administrators worthy of the name must moderate their moderators who play the big guns and abuse their status and who do not know the rules of this forum themselves. ATTACK is a bad word, it is rather challenged to its contradictions and its abuse of authority very easy to see. Example, Hack-hook closed a topic by prejudice, it was against the rules of this forum and what did you do the administrators? NOTHING!
He could have moved the topic to another section but no, he abused his power to close a topic that bothers him. Apply the rules to everyone, even you.
3: We believe in freedom of speech and freedom of information as granted under Article 16 of the Constitution. SOPs apply as per the forum rules on our international members.
4: Pakistan Defence Forum is not responsible for the opinions or threads posted by our members. Each opinion or thread is solely the responsibility of the member. The forum reserves the right to moderate as per its guidelines.
Can you tell me where Jauk really stands here and at what level?
Individual Harassment
- Please do not spoil PDF for other members; such behavior includes following a member on PDF and replying to their posts with harassing content such as thinly veiled threats or passive aggressive behavior or making the member feel harassed. Such accusations would be investigated and result in a ban. Also, please do not share any personal information about a member on PDF. We are a public forum and do not attempt to gather such information using PDF -
Here is food for discussion and thought and names come to mind. I am very quick-witted and will prove some things in the future. A lot of contradictions among individuals here, I observe a lot and make connections and cross-checks
Propaganda
- Sometimes news sources are used to spread propaganda: weaponized information to achieve a certain political goal. This is usually to incriminate hatred between groups of people or to vilify them. PDF does not believe in aiding the spread of propaganda, which does not mean that PDF is closed to discussions on such items. When posting such information for discussion or clarification, please clearly state this in your post, otherwise it will be considered as aiding in the spread of propaganda and will result in penalty. -
Hack-Hook
INT'L MOD
Wrong the cep and distance is not linear it's a deviation in measurement of bearing of missile which is done via a gyroscope it's not a single deviation it's a failure of measurement that add to previous failures . It's measured by degree not meter . In 500kmm it may be 1 degree in 1000km it can turn to 5 degree
Tijani
Registered Member
I understand and I've had the discussion with Persian on the same matter. I for one appreciate our discussion here even if I disagree with many of you. There's a ot of knowledgeable people around. I believe Jauk and Persian to be among them. I pray we can keep the relative peace and sense of humor without people taking things personal. All good
Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
- Thread starter
- #1,162
Emad has claimed CEP < 50m
Kheibar Shekan claimed CEP < 20m
Ghadr CEP unknown
Correct! But in total contradiction to your long and repetitive posts that Iran failed in both TP1 and TP2. A single post like this does not change your long standing positions and the anti-Iranian sources you've used ("500m CEP". My foot).
Mehdipersian
Trusted Member
Western media always publish nonsense about Iran. They are not reliable sources.
First, we should see clear satellite images of the collision sites, then comment on the missiles and their number and accuracy, which they did not do published yet.
Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
- Thread starter
- #1,166
we have pretty good satellite imagery (none provided by Iran)
we have videos of 20-30 missiles used
we can make assumptions and inferences based on what we know instead of waiting for perfect information
when a reputable academic conducts a thorough analysis I do not think it should not be dismissed out of hand, although you are free to do so
Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
- Thread starter
- #1,167
try challenging the arguments posited instead of reverting to endless ad hominems for a change
the failure of TP1 and TP2 is self-evident at this point. Israel bombed Iran directly and killed 5 Iranians and we have not even responded. you will try to defend everything and turn anything into a victory, but you don't fool many people.
calling every argument you don't like 'anti-Iranian' to create an echo chamber of delusion will not help anyone
do you just want a thread ban?
Musings
Administrator
Jauk - come on bro - raise the level and stop being petty
