Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

Hack-Hook said:
interesting , where was the target that the engine fall in Gorgan
Click to expand...
I think it was testing a new cluster warhead configuration but failed horribly

remember US leaks about Iran testing cluster munitions on 700km missile with only 2/7 of the warheads hitting their targets
 
I think it was testing a new cluster warhead configuration but failed horribly remember US leaks about Iran testing cluster munitions on 700km missile with only 2/7 of the warheads hitting their targets You mean MIRV warhead , a cluster warhead usually don't target individually. They disperse bomb let when warhead reach destination . By the way do each reentry vehicle in a MIRV warhead had its own engine ?
They usually target Dasht-e-kavir or Kavir-e-lut the missile was off by hundreds of km if they used their usual target.
 
Hack-Hook said:
I think it was testing a new cluster warhead configuration but failed horribly remember US leaks about Iran testing cluster munitions on 700km missile with only 2/7 of the warheads hitting their targets You mean MIRV warhead , a cluster warhead usually don't target individually. They disperse bomb let when warhead reach destination . By the way do each reentry vehicle in a MIRV warhead had its own engine ?
They usually target Dasht-e-kavir or Kavir-e-lut the missile was off by hundreds of km if they used their usual target.
Click to expand...

MRV and MIRV are two different things. And so is cluster (tiny unguided bomblets).

MRV is just separate warheads heading to the same target

MIRV is separate warheads heading to different targets

MIRVs are for nukes and don’t make sense in conventional capacity due to cost.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


counterpoint: the missiles used against US troops in the al Asad base in Iraq a few years later showed much better accuracy
 
Persian Gulf said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


counterpoint: the missiles used against US troops in the al Asad base in Iraq a few years later showed much better accuracy
Click to expand...


That’s an apple to oranges comparison.

A Fatah is a artillery rocket similar to HIMARS and others. Typically they are much lower cost because their guidance systems and shorter range.

You can’t compare the INS/GNS that goes in a Fatah to Iran’s top BMs.

Fatah like the old Zelzal series are more mass saturation attack weapon systems like GRAD.
 
Immortals said:
That’s an apple to oranges comparison.

A Fatah is a artillery rocket similar to HIMARS and others. Typically they are much lower cost because their guidance systems and shorter range.

You can’t compare the INS/GNS that goes in a Fatah to Iran’s top BMs.

Fatah like the old Zelzal series are more mass saturation attack weapon systems like GRAD.
Click to expand...
Fateh-110 to Fateh-313 is not apples to oranges

Fateh-110 is not an artillery rocket, it's a ballistic missile
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


this is not a very attractive option unless your enemy is 1000km away and has no air defences
 
Need of the hour

- Supersonic CM
- Stealth CM
- ALBMs

Rest is covered, we have modern most HGV+Skip glide MaRVs, Cluster munitioned IR/MRBMs, AShBMs, long-range AShCM/BMs etc. A force that has seen more battle action than any other missile forces.
 
500 meters underground in Iran there is another Iran...military cities with amazing arsenals of missiles and aircraft.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 1, guests: 1)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top