I'm confused. First and foremost Iranian 'MALE' are cheap relative to their counterparts which you skirted. Secondly, who and where is applying them where they are currently susceptible?MALE drones have a higher cost and higher operating cost per hour than low endurance and low altitude drones. Their use on a modern battlefield anywhere near contested territory is dropping.
Iranian MALE drones are just as susceptible (if not more so) than American/Israeli/Chinese MALE drones to being shot down. If HZ/Houthi’s can use a 358 loitering missile to knock these prized possessions out of the air, then imagine a western army with heavy air defense capability. Hopefully it explains why Gaza, Fotros, and Kaman-22 aren’t being produced in any meaningful numbers. Fotros in particular might not even exist outside of less than <10 drones number could be as low <5.
Either go low observable (LO) @ HALE or go cheap and suicide like (S-136 class) the middle class is vulnerable and borderline impotent against hot conflicts, much like today’s Bomber aircraft (B-52/B-1) are useless in hot conflicts.
At the end there is a need for surveillance and if they do get shot down by expensive systems so be it. You may want to discuss that with Hezbollah, BTW who's sending these against the depleted opponent. You're thinking far too 1980s and conventionally.









