"It Is Ours Too": Pakistan Brings Back Sanskrit, Plans Gita, Mahabharata Studies

There is nothing wrong in studying Sanskirt as an academic discipline.

To understand the old Hindu texts. Hindus makes 15% of humanity, so it is necessary to understand the Hindu religion and their culture.
 
...It is those who earned Allah’s condemnation and displeasure—some being reduced to apes* and pigs and worshippers of false gods (5:60)

Ramayana
is a must to understand the mindset of the Ram Rajya of Hindutva Bharat.......

By the by, the greatest epic of Bangla literature is Meghnad Badh Kabya by Michael Madushudan Datta (a Hindu converted into Christianity), one of the greatest poets of the subcontinent in the 19th century. And, it dealt with the backstabbing by Ram via employing traitors in Ravana regime to kill Meghnad (also known as Indrajit), their top-most warrior who couldn't be defeated in a face-to-face battle. Call it the Hindutva SOP....

Two immediate take-aways:
  • Turning the Taliban into Hanuman* (large-sized monkeys whose numbers are inexhaustible) to do the heavy but mindless work against Pak to be the foremost line of offense
  • Employing as many traitors as possible to eliminate the "Indrajits" of Pakistan via treachery, backstabbing, conspiracy etc.
I love it!
No evolution but men turning into apes and pigs now that's what I call a revelation!!!

And as for the meghnad part
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Since you're a Bengali same goes for you
 
The creation of a nation state called "India" by Pandit Jawarlal Nehru on 15th August 1947, while knowing full well that the River Indus and its legacy civilisation was not the substantive part of this new nation state, is the PRECISE DEFINITION of the bolded text in your comment.

Your nation should have been called Bharat or Hindustan or anything else on its inception, yet Nehru chose deliberately to appropriate a neighbouring nation's ancient history and birthright.

The appropriation continues to this day, and Pakistan, the true inheritors of the IVC, will reject your assertions. You will remain confused until we sort this mess out - understandable.

@Foinikas for your interest, I have often drawn a similarity between Pakistan's objection to India even calling itself "India" in the above context, with FYROM using "Macedonia" in its identity politics, when the true historical Macedonia of Philip and Alexander actually has nothing to do with 🇲🇰.

It is partly our own fault in Pakistan that this has happened, but now we are pushing back against false projections of pseudo-history from neighbouring nations.
annajet.gif
 
Your assertion that Pakistanis and Indians are routinely mistaken for one another is flawed and patently incorrect, except among those westerners who are perhaps uneducated.

The Persian and Greek scholars knew about differences between the different tribes thousands of years ago. Those differences have persisted throughout history under various guises and manifestations. Some have been willing to become civilised and organised, while others have not.

Indeed, Herodotus wrote specifically on the distinct differences between the different ancient tribes of the Indian subcontinent (post the collapse of the IVC and the arrival of the Aryans).

Those who lay in the Indus Valley and to its west (I.e. modern day Pakistan and Afghanistan) were variably described as war like, gold miners, and the most financially productive satrapies of the Achaemenid empire.

Those who lay further to the east were known for the following observations in Herodotus' works:

"Other Indians, to the east of these, are nomads and eat raw flesh. They are called Padaians (Padaioi). It is said to be their custom that, when anyone of them (whether man or woman) is sick, a man’s closest friends kill him saying that he will be lost to them as meat if he is wasted by disease. Though he denies that he is sick, they will not believe him, but kill and eat him. (2) When a woman is sick, she is put to death (like the men) by the women who are her close acquaintances. They sacrifice anyone who reaches old age and feast on his flesh. But not many of them reach old age, for the Padaians kill everyone who gets sick before that time."

"Other Indians have the following different custom: they neither kill anything that has life, nor sow anything, nor are they wont to have houses, but they live upon herbs, and they have a grain the size of millet in a pod, which springs spontaneously from the earth. This they gather, and boil it and eat it with the pod. When any one of them falls into any disorder, he goes and lies down in the desert, and no one takes any thought about him, whether dead or sick [Herodotus is probably talking here about Brahmins, ancient Hindu ascetics, who were strict vegetarians]."

"These Indians whom I have described have intercourse openly like cattle. They are all black-skinned, like the Ethiopians. (2) Their semen too, which they ejaculate into the women, is not white like other men’s, but black like their skin and resembles in this respect that of the Ethiopians. These Indians dwell far away from the Persians southwards, and were not subjects of king Darius."


hq720.jpg
What the hell did I just read!!!
 
Pakistan has been honored and elevated as Civilzation but they wanna regress again and go back in Jahiliyaa
 
Pakistan has been honored and elevated as Civilzation but they wanna regress again and go back in Jahiliyaa
Perhaps the motivation, by the university lecturers and academics, is to re-claim the history of the region, link the people living there to the people that have come before, and build a counter narrative to the Indian narrative of claiming the current Muslims in Pakistan are mostly descendants of outsiders (forgetting Hinduism itself, in one form or another, entered the region only some 1000-1500 years before Islam, and that the IVC is even older and long lived than their exclusivity of majority culture; their culture is just a cultural layer not the foundation of the local populace).

But if we see these academics, as building a cadre of subject matter experts, as I had hoped, we can have experts that can guide our military’s officer class to better understand the mindset of fervent Hindu rulers in the Indian polity and officer class, who may be or one day maybe in charge, as India is reaching its demographic moment. With a lot of excess males, India is in a dangerous moment in its existence, and may start wars, like op Sindoor by sending hordes of its men as cannon fodder, especially if they can not show enough economic improvements to the common person.

We need a division within the Pakistan army that can replicate an Indian army division, to better help train against, especially in the realm of information warfare. We need only look at how off the Indian sides assumptions are about the motivation of the Muslims in the officer core of Pakistan, and think of what gaps we have in understand the “true believers” who rose through the ranks of the RSS/BJP and into the Indian political and officer class. We need to understand the nuance of their thinking and the justifications they could employ upon their populations.

On the issue you raised, in many ways, especially, amongst the privileged, there is already many behaviors of jahiliya. One need only look at some of the videos coming out of these universities. I doubt most would want to revert to Hinduism and much rather become “la deen”, except in Islamic rituals.

P.s. in university, I had the Gita as an assigned text as an introduction to Hinduism and one of its guiding philosophical texts.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top