JF-17 PFX program

The graphic that was posted on here depicting the PFX as an incremental stage of up gradation of the JF-17B3 into JF17P to the Alpha or whatever and then to PFX. Now what I gather from it is that it always was meant to be a completely localised JF17. The name also suggests that in contrast to being a Joint Fighter 17 Block 3 (JF17-B3), it is now the Pakistan Fighter X (PFX). It’s right there if you look at it.
I don’t think it’s going beyond the JF-17 Alpha or whatever they had before the confused design they called PFX.

The objective is to counter what they will face - J-10 caters to Rafale/meteor combo and JF-17blk3 will add to that counter.

JF-17(constantly upgraded) and F-16s are still sufficient for MKIs and whenever Tejas does pose an actual threat or they add more Rafale PAF will beef up the Jf-17 further and add more J-10s.

Then in 5-6 years they’ll have J-31s landing in to further up the ante - unless India rushes a su-57(unlikely) or F-35(very possible in a short time under Trump).

The bumbling by PAF is matched by even more ridiculous bumbling in the east - it all balances out
 
I don’t think it’s going beyond the JF-17 Alpha or whatever they had before the confused design they called PFX.

The objective is to counter what they will face - J-10 caters to Rafale/meteor combo and JF-17blk3 will add to that counter.

JF-17(constantly upgraded) and F-16s are still sufficient for MKIs and whenever Tejas does pose an actual threat or they add more Rafale PAF will beef up the Jf-17 further and add more J-10s.

Then in 5-6 years they’ll have J-31s landing in to further up the ante - unless India rushes a su-57(unlikely) or F-35(very possible in a short time under Trump).

The bumbling by PAF is matched by even more ridiculous bumbling in the east - it all balances out
I do wonder why Typhoon was not seriously pursued. The entire consortium is struggling. The British prod line is basically dormant. The German one is at threat of going dormant, while the other two are in similar states.

Yes it would be a costly outlay, but there is some serious benefit to this i think. Look at the SK procurement, they were offered 60 typhoons for around $7bn in the end, however, this number included domestic production of 48 airframes alongside a $2bn investment into the KFX and also technical assistance.

The Europeans are desperate to keep the lines warm as its a serious loss in terms of their national capabilities, the Indians made it clear that Typhoon was not of interest, it is literally not selling anywhere, i seriously believe the PAF could have negotiated a serious deal, which would have included investment and technical assistance/collaboration into a PFX style project.

I dont even think support is an issue, the biggest ballache in Typhoon deals is Germany, who seems to be strangely warm with us, they are more than happy to arm and support us, the rest we are on good or great terms with. I think the J-10 buy was somewhat of a mistake even, typhoons, plus a package including investment into our programs and technical assistance could have been the way, heck, we could have negotiated a local production agreement to gain experience working with composites and advanced production techniques, such a buy would have been a way to bring PAC into the modern era, gain investment and assistance into a modernized/upgraded JF-17/PFX, while also giving the PAF the offensive edge which it tries to seek via the J-10
 
Agree with most of what you’ve said but don’t agree with your view that China won’t help Pakistan due to fear of the PFX competing for exports with Chinese Birds. If this was the case why would China have helped Pakistan develop and export the JF-17 Block 3? Is that product not a cheaper competitor to the J10CE??
China doesn’t strike me as desperate to export its fighters. If a country wants them and if providing them suits China’s strategic interests, then yes of course they would welcome any such orders, but their main focus is their own domestic needs. Second comes their Strategic interests and Pakistan is still important to these. Exporting fighters to the global market comes much lower on their priority list.
The J-10CE is a medium fighter and the JF-17 is a light fighter. Their target customers in the foreign trade market do not overlap, so there is no competition between them.

Due to the rapid development of China's fighter industry, the PLAAF heavily opted for heavy fighters it preferred, leaving the J-10 series in a rather awkward position. Since the JF-17's foreign export business has not been able to meet AVIC's expectations, AVIC plans to make the J-10CE a star product in the foreign trade market. We can tell by observing AVIC's recent moves.
1, J-20 and J-16 series are undergoing mass production, and, this mass production behavior has been going on for a long time. It will be a very huge number.
2, CAC is setting up a new J-10 production line in Guizhou. there is not much demand for J-10 in PLAAF. Obviously, this is a preparation for mass export of J-10CE.

The J-10 series was originally PLAAF's own fighter, and it was not initially planned for export.CAC initially had high hopes for the export of the JF-17, and wanted to make it a star product. Since the JF-17 is a China-Pakistani cooperation project and it's production line is in PAC, the JF-17's foreign export business is very slow (I won't analyze the exact reasons). Obviously, CAC is very sad about this situation, but it can't take over the JF-17 completely or develop it independently, so we see the “J-10CE program”.
Currently, the J-10CE and JF-17 foreign trade markets are still staggered and not competitive. However, if the PAC does not have a better and clearer development direction for the JF-17, the J-10CE will likely maintain the same foreign trade price as the JF-17 in the future. Who is more competitive under the same price condition?

i agree , which is why i am all for creating indiginous sub systems first all of them every last one of them and create an ecosystem and start small like really small. like a jet trainer for example and them go from there any ways best of luck to Pakistan on this project.
In fact, I have always hoped that Pakistan would take more pragmatic action to complete the full indigenization of the JF-17 B3.
For example:
Try to set up a factory that can produce AESA T/R components fully indigenously. Raw materials and related technology can be imported from China. It is not necessary that excessive performance can be pursued when just starting out. From nothing to something, then to something stronger. ------- directly import T/R components to assemble their own named AESA. The practical significance of this behavior is not great.
 
JF-17 PFX won't be a twin engine jet. If it turns out to be a twin engine jet then there would be no new plane it would be J-31 being produced in Pakistan. If PFX is a separate project then there is no way in hell it would be twin engine jet. It may turn out to be a single engine stealth fighter jet with Arabs financing and Turkish help. China will have very little role to play in its development.
 
Last edited:
…China will have very later role to play in its development.

Why always this strange belive that China and pays for anything if the main intention is to scale down the CHinese content, to maybe full-indigenisise the JF-17 and add even Turkish items?

Why should China pay a penny for its development for being de facto pushed ou of the joint development?
 
Why always this strange belive that China and pays for anything if the main intention is to scale down the CHinese content, to maybe full-indigenisise the JF-17 and add even Turkish items?

Why should China pay a penny for its development for being de facto pushed ou of the joint development?
I suspect that the vast majority of Pakistanis seem to be unaware of the relationship between China and Turkey. They think that “Pakistan+China+Turkey” would be a very good partnership. Unfortunately, it was not to be.

Let me be frank. China and Turkey are just ordinary international relations now. To be more direct, Turkey has done a lot of hostile things against China, and some of those things are still going on in the shadows. China is now in a period of peaceful development and does not want to intensify external conflicts, but it does not mean that he has forgotten these things. From China's perspective, China-Turkish relations are essentially the same as China-Indian relations. The only difference is that India borders China.

So, please, Pakistani friends, give up this idea.
 
Everyone has an opinion and a bottom orifice ... you got to live with both .
 
Looking at this thread day by day, I am now hoping for whatever PAC is trying to do with PFX, they should do it fast and provide concrete data (anything!!!!), because this is getting SO confusing, that you either start believing everything or not believing everything at all.

Next we know, someone's going to share a blog from 4chan claiming PFX is going to be a automated 6th Gen fighter shooting lasers and having a FTL (Faster Than Light) engines for travelling through space.
 
I suspect that the vast majority of Pakistanis seem to be unaware of the relationship between China and Turkey. They think that “Pakistan+China+Turkey” would be a very good partnership. Unfortunately, it was not to be.

Let me be frank. China and Turkey are just ordinary international relations now. To be more direct, Turkey has done a lot of hostile things against China, and some of those things are still going on in the shadows. China is now in a period of peaceful development and does not want to intensify external conflicts, but it does not mean that he has forgotten these things. From China's perspective, China-Turkish relations are essentially the same as China-Indian relations. The only difference is that India borders China.

So, please, Pakistani friends, give up this idea.
Listen Chinese friend, please pipe down.
First there is some comprehension error on your part it is maybe due the fact that your Translator isn't great, or your AI isn't able to understand the context of what is being said here.
Second point being the need to understand even what PF-X is, it is not an NGAF per se, it is simply another upgraded block for the next tranche of Jeffs with the greatest number of local parts as possible. Even from inception Jeffs Chinese subsystems (avionics/comms/controllers) were replaced/retrofitted with Western or Local parts because of it being not the best product (to put it lightly) from China sole reason why even after jeff procurement PAF was looking for JAS-39 and had rejected FC-20 due to it not bringing anything valuable, all Chinese subsystems were slightly improved Rev-Eng soviet era tech not great (but not terrible also), it had compatibility issues therefore all the source code for the embedded was mostly like designed/described locally as-well.
Lastly, PF-X is a mere block 4, with IRS-T, more composites, Local AESA, avionics, ESW, comms, composites and some Have Glass tech to lower rcs this will all come to fruition with help of Turks, as their tech is modern (and more Western which PAF likes.)
 
Listen Chinese friend, please pipe down.
First there is some comprehension error on your part it is maybe due the fact that your Translator isn't great, or your AI isn't able to understand the context of what is being said here.
Second point being the need to understand even what PF-X is, it is not an NGAF per se, it is simply another upgraded block for the next tranche of Jeffs with the greatest number of local parts as possible. Even from inception Jeffs Chinese subsystems (avionics/comms/controllers) were replaced/retrofitted with Western or Local parts because of it being not the best product (to put it lightly) from China sole reason why even after jeff procurement PAF was looking for JAS-39 and had rejected FC-20 due to it not bringing anything valuable, all Chinese subsystems were slightly improved Rev-Eng soviet era tech not great (but not terrible also), it had compatibility issues therefore all the source code for the embedded was mostly like designed/described locally as-well.
Lastly, PF-X is a mere block 4, with IRS-T, more composites, Local AESA, avionics, ESW, comms, composites and some Have Glass tech to lower rcs this will all come to fruition with help of Turks, as their tech is modern (and more Western which PAF likes.)
I knew I would be criticized by my Pakistani friends for this statement above. I will state it again.

I have no intention of judging Pakistan's foreign policy. Our traditional culture teaches us not to get involved in other people's family matters. I also know that Pakistan has very good relations with Turkey. I don't have any problem with that.
China has military cooperation with Pakistan and Pakistan has military cooperation with Turkey. It is perfectly possible for these two relationships to co-exist as long as they do not affect the interests of a third party, and they do not affect the three-way relationship. That is, China-Pakistan military cooperation does not involve Turkish interests, and Pakistan-Turkey military cooperation does not involve Chinese interests.

However, it is unrealistic for the three parties to work together on a military project.
The JF-17 is a China-Pakistani cooperative program. Based on Pakistan's actual situation, CAC will open up some technologies and interfaces to facilitate Pakistan's interface with other partners and at the same time benefit Pakistan's local production. So, we will see that some parts of JF-17 are jointly participated by Pakistan+Turkey.PLAAF does not equip JF-17, so this operation will not involve Chinese interests.

However, if this kind of cooperation between Pakistan and Turkey involves the need for CAC to provide core technology, it will meet with great resistance. At the same time, Pakistan will also encounter huge resistance when it wants to acquire more advanced technology from CAC. ------ We can install state-of-the-art radar in JF-17 but cannot allow its manufacturing technology to flow to an unfriendly country.
 
I do wonder why Typhoon was not seriously pursued. The entire consortium is struggling. The British prod line is basically dormant. The German one is at threat of going dormant, while the other two are in similar states.

Yes it would be a costly outlay, but there is some serious benefit to this i think. Look at the SK procurement, they were offered 60 typhoons for around $7bn in the end, however, this number included domestic production of 48 airframes alongside a $2bn investment into the KFX and also technical assistance.

The Europeans are desperate to keep the lines warm as its a serious loss in terms of their national capabilities, the Indians made it clear that Typhoon was not of interest, it is literally not selling anywhere, i seriously believe the PAF could have negotiated a serious deal, which would have included investment and technical assistance/collaboration into a PFX style project.

I dont even think support is an issue, the biggest ballache in Typhoon deals is Germany, who seems to be strangely warm with us, they are more than happy to arm and support us, the rest we are on good or great terms with. I think the J-10 buy was somewhat of a mistake even, typhoons, plus a package including investment into our programs and technical assistance could have been the way, heck, we could have negotiated a local production agreement to gain experience working with composites and advanced production techniques, such a buy would have been a way to bring PAC into the modern era, gain investment and assistance into a modernized/upgraded JF-17/PFX, while also giving the PAF the offensive edge which it tries to seek via the J-10
In a nutshell it was - but approvals were not guaranteed and then the 2005 earthquake hit.
 
I knew I would be criticized by my Pakistani friends for this statement above. I will state it again.

I have no intention of judging Pakistan's foreign policy. Our traditional culture teaches us not to get involved in other people's family matters. I also know that Pakistan has very good relations with Turkey. I don't have any problem with that.
China has military cooperation with Pakistan and Pakistan has military cooperation with Turkey. It is perfectly possible for these two relationships to co-exist as long as they do not affect the interests of a third party, and they do not affect the three-way relationship. That is, China-Pakistan military cooperation does not involve Turkish interests, and Pakistan-Turkey military cooperation does not involve Chinese interests.

However, it is unrealistic for the three parties to work together on a military project.
The JF-17 is a China-Pakistani cooperative program. Based on Pakistan's actual situation, CAC will open up some technologies and interfaces to facilitate Pakistan's interface with other partners and at the same time benefit Pakistan's local production. So, we will see that some parts of JF-17 are jointly participated by Pakistan+Turkey.PLAAF does not equip JF-17, so this operation will not involve Chinese interests.

However, if this kind of cooperation between Pakistan and Turkey involves the need for CAC to provide core technology, it will meet with great resistance. At the same time, Pakistan will also encounter huge resistance when it wants to acquire more advanced technology from CAC. ------ We can install state-of-the-art radar in JF-17 but cannot allow its manufacturing technology to flow to an unfriendly country.
There is no need for CAC involvement -

Pakistan did not involve CAC per se when it installed custom avionics such as radios and ancillary EW systems - Turkish ASELPOD - Local weapons and so on.
For JF-17 the dependence on CAC is structural - nothing to do with avionics or wiring.
 
In a nutshell it was - but approvals were not guaranteed and then the 2005 earthquake hit.
now more than ever the likelihood is high, theyre desperate to save jobs
 
Listen Chinese friend, please pipe down.
First there is some comprehension error on your part it is maybe due the fact that your Translator isn't great, or your AI isn't able to understand the context of what is being said here.
Second point being the need to understand even what PF-X is, it is not an NGAF per se, it is simply another upgraded block for the next tranche of Jeffs with the greatest number of local parts as possible. Even from inception Jeffs Chinese subsystems (avionics/comms/controllers) were replaced/retrofitted with Western or Local parts because of it being not the best product (to put it lightly) from China sole reason why even after jeff procurement PAF was looking for JAS-39 and had rejected FC-20 due to it not bringing anything valuable, all Chinese subsystems were slightly improved Rev-Eng soviet era tech not great (but not terrible also), it had compatibility issues therefore all the source code for the embedded was mostly like designed/described locally as-well.
Lastly, PF-X is a mere block 4, with IRS-T, more composites, Local AESA, avionics, ESW, comms, composites and some Have Glass tech to lower rcs this will all come to fruition with help of Turks, as their tech is modern (and more Western which PAF likes.)
The PAF JAS-39 and J-10(FC-20) saga are unrelated for the most part.

PAF needed a strike fighter - not an interceptor air superiority buy post 2001.

It was already committed to its original wish of 115 F-16s and pursuant of it - it asked French for M2k which they denied to push Rafale that was unaffordable.

Gripen was pushed alongside Saab-2000 but the PAF showed little interest since it already had interceptor plans in JF-17 - for strike Gripen brought nothing new vs F-16 and PAF showed interest in J-10 as a Mirage+ + option but did see all the deficiencies in it you described but just as with other Chinese purchases provided a list of improvements and until 2010(Thanks to 2008 market crash and massive PPP mismanagement and corruption) it was still focused on the J-10A(FC-20)
 
now more than ever the likelihood is high, theyre desperate to save jobs
Turkey will help them -
But they made a big miss by not investing in more multirole capabilities and lost to Rafale in key markets.

Either way - not in scope of discussion her
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top