FuturePAF
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Ideally yes, if the mission is side by side support, but there is a thing for a semi-stealthy design flying ahead as a picket force, drawing fire and using electronic warfare to survive long enough to make the enemy reveal its positions and/or expend its air defense munitions.Loyal wingman of 5 generation fighter should be stealthy, I believe it is more suitable with stealth looking drone than 4 generation design plane.
Better use the money to develop stealth drone from clean sheet design.
The reason a JF-17 sized plane should be used and not a more basic drone is the drone based on the JF-17 can be large enough to have long range, carry heavier EW equipment and/or its own SEAD munitions, and its maneuverability to pop-up upon the enemy and draw a response from what appears to be a manned attack profile. Similar to the Boeing MQ-28 Ghost Bat. Due to its size, and efficient engine, it can have a long loiter time and could also function as an unmanned fighter escort to tankers and ISR/EW aircraft like AEW, and be controlled by crew on board these aircraft, to protect them or draw fire away from these aircraft. The other mission could be maintaining a continuous CAP over major bases and strategic sites, freeing up manned fighters for offensive missions.
Either way, China will probably need hundreds if not over a thousand fighter sized drones, so securing a design that could be build at existing factories not building 5th Gen fighters as well as in Pakistan could help give those factories years of contracts to keep their staff busy and up to date on their skill set. Pakistan could build a few of these $20-25 million planes and sell 2-3 to China for each J-31 it procures from them.
But your right, It would end up becoming basically a clean sheet design, basically of approx. the same size as the JF-17 being its only shared characteristics.
Last edited:




