JF-17 - Updates, News & Discussion

Sir, there is a difference in posturing. If I understand correctly then F-16s fired missiles on Indian planes only in defense of other PAF planes participating in the fight.
Indians tried even that to complain with the US saying it was a violation of the terms set between the US and Pak.
The F16 was the fighter with the longest engagement range PAF had at the time. It makes logical sense that it would be the fighter the PAF used to give air cover to retreating strike packages. If your enemy is chasing your strike package, you want to see and engage the enemy from the further distance possible, not when it gets closer to your border or friendly aircraft.

The PAFs offensive mission was purely A2G based, if they wanted to go and hunt for Indian fighters they’d deploy an entirely different package. With the missions goal there was no need to send your longest range BVR A2A fighter deep into enemy territory and risk losing it.

Your strike package and its escorts will never actively engage an enemy aircraft unless they absolutely have to for self defense, shooting a missile gives away your position and draws a lot of attention to you.


India can make all the noise it wants. If the US didn’t want Pakistan to use F16s against India, they wouldn’t have given Pakistan 500 AMRAAMs. There is no restriction on PAFs use of F16s against India during a conflict.
 
I think the more apt way to understand if what we're "producing" means anything is to judge based on valuation, i.e., how much of the value of said program do we source locally?

So, for the JF-17, the engine is from abroad, the electronics are sourced from abroad, part of the airframe comes from China, the aluminium is mostly imported, and so on.

We're obviously not generating 58% of the JF-17's actual value locally. OTOH, Indians source like 60%+ value of the SU-30MKI locally, e.g., key parts of the engine are manufactured from scratch in India, aerostructures are manufactured locally with locally forged aluminium and fabricated composites, etc.

The problem with the JF-17 is that we never quite transitioned it from being a PAF project to an aerospace industry program whereby the local industry gets to engage in sourcing more valuable inputs.
**sighs**
At their height, the F6 rebuild factory, the F7 rebuilt factory, and the Mirage rebuild factory were able to make almost all components for those aircraft locally and could probably, if asked, have made new aircraft just from spares they were making. In fact, there was a serious proposal to make a next-generation Mirage by building a ROSE airframe and put tech developed for JF17 in it.
These dam factories were able to revive our Cobra gun ships from the dead in the last few years.
The actual on-the-ground difference between licensed production and joint production can be hard to ascertain, but FFS, the Jeff was designed by a joint team of CAC and PAC (PAC made mockups) and the contract specified that CAC would produce (with PAC input) the initial prototypes, both would be involved in testing, both in China and Pakistan, the CAC would lead and assist CAC in designing and fabricating tooling, and setting up propduction fasciities in Pakistan. PAC to this day has the capability to make the full jet, and there has been serious talk about making it fully in Pakistan, it would take 1-3 years to set it up.
The avionics are all made in Pakistan, the radars have been developed in China, and are manufactured in Pakistan.
 
Sweden: won’t sell any “offensive” system. Everything available for indian.
Sweden because they are squeamish about governments , they didnt sold us because of our politics and alleged human rights abuses
 
PAF is looking at a mix of Chinese and Western solutions for SHORAD. Each one can solve a specific piece of the puzzle. China will probably brought into helping complete FAAZ-SL and LoMADS, while a Western SAM will be sought for point-def coverage in tandem with the short-and-medium-range FAAZ-SL and LoMADS. So, basically, LoMADS for 100 km, FAAZ SL for 20-25 km, and a Western SAM like IRIS-T SL for 10-15 km. I mean, IRIS-T SL and CAMM-ER are the big brands, don't discount smaller players too, like Turkey's HISAR or even, by some miracle, we grab whatever's left of the Umkhonto.

What would be interesting to watch tho is how much of a relationship LoMADS has with the DK-10 because, interestingly, the latter can be worked into a VLS. So, one could look at potentially updating the Type 054A/Ps with the LoMADS.
I believe so both the LOMADS & FAAZ-SL are PAAD Projects not intended for the PAF.
 
**sighs**
At their height, the F6 rebuild factory, the F7 rebuilt factory, and the Mirage rebuild factory were able to make almost all components for those aircraft locally and could probably, if asked, have made new aircraft just from spares they were making. In fact, there was a serious proposal to make a next-generation Mirage by building a ROSE airframe and put tech developed for JF17 in it.
These dam factories were able to revive our Cobra gun ships from the dead in the last few years.
The actual on-the-ground difference between licensed production and joint production can be hard to ascertain, but FFS, the Jeff was designed by a joint team of CAC and PAC (PAC made mockups) and the contract specified that CAC would produce (with PAC input) the initial prototypes, both would be involved in testing, both in China and Pakistan, the CAC would lead and assist CAC in designing and fabricating tooling, and setting up propduction fasciities in Pakistan. PAC to this day has the capability to make the full jet, and there has been serious talk about making it fully in Pakistan, it would take 1-3 years to set it up.
The avionics are all made in Pakistan, the radars have been developed in China, and are manufactured in Pakistan.
***********sigh***********

Okay, how about you and I make a plan and talk to one of the CPDs of the JF-17 program.

I'm serious.

We can talk to the folks who set up the MRO for RD-93, who've managed Block-2, who've set up the design for Block-3, etc. You name it, they're all retired now, and you can ask them to verify each and every point you have up there.

But before we do that, let's at least refer back to basic first principles:

1. Folks (I'm not attributing any of this to the PAF officers who did the work as they'll never claim such a thing) say we supported in the design of the JF-17. Yet, we don't have a single senior DESIGN expert going INTO NOR COMING OUT of the JF-17 program. NOT ONE. What does that tell you? It tells you that we didn't contribute to the core design work of the Thunder nor did we produce anyone who learned enough to carry the work without CAC's team in the flow.

2. The radar and avionics are produced locally themselves draw on imported inputs. I know as much because I personally know the men leading the main contractors, like Teresol. They designed some of the original avionics for the JF-17, but they themselves will tell you where they get the critical inputs fabbed from (i.e., China or the West). Yes, it's great that these entities can DESIGN and even INTEGRATE COTS into new solutions. This is excellent, but, the value add from this activity is marginal relative to the cost of buying all of the actual COTS inputs we need to put it together.

3. Manufacturing the whole JF-17 in Pakistan was never the issue because even if PAC did that, the value would still need to be imported from China. This is the part that all the people amongst us have trouble understanding.

BTW, it was no different with the F-7s, F-6s, or even Mirage III/5s. However, with the Mirages at least, work was happening outside of France, like in RSA, to literally manufacture new wings and other aero-structures from scratch. Atlas had the literal complete jigs for this and we even reached a point with them where we bought some surplus NEW Cheetah wings from their plants to retrofit onto our Mirages.

But the point of bringing this up isn't to say that we'd be No. 1 with RSA and not China. Rather, it is to refute the ridiculous claim that we'd be a 300 F-7 force without China or the JF-17. That's not true, we did have other routes.
 
Last edited:
I believe so both the LOMADS & FAAZ-SL are PAAD Projects not intended for the PAF.
Post May 2025 that is likely no longer the case. The answer to "how much AD" is "yes. By the way, its PA AD they get rather anal if someone writes PAAD for some weird reason.
 
**sighs**
At their height, the F6 rebuild factory, the F7 rebuilt factory, and the Mirage rebuild factory were able to make almost all components for those aircraft locally and could probably, if asked, have made new aircraft just from spares they were making. In fact, there was a serious proposal to make a next-generation Mirage by building a ROSE airframe and put tech developed for JF17 in it.
These dam factories were able to revive our Cobra gun ships from the dead in the last few years.
The actual on-the-ground difference between licensed production and joint production can be hard to ascertain, but FFS, the Jeff was designed by a joint team of CAC and PAC (PAC made mockups) and the contract specified that CAC would produce (with PAC input) the initial prototypes, both would be involved in testing, both in China and Pakistan, the CAC would lead and assist CAC in designing and fabricating tooling, and setting up propduction fasciities in Pakistan. PAC to this day has the capability to make the full jet, and there has been serious talk about making it fully in Pakistan, it would take 1-3 years to set it up.
The avionics are all made in Pakistan, the radars have been developed in China, and are manufactured in Pakistan.
Ah, all this is in stark contrast with 'MKI is more Indian than Thunder being Pakistani' narrative.

To some gentlemen, making plastic and aluminum in Pakistan is a prerequisite to making Thunder a Pakistani plane even if these things are cheaply available from multiple sources.

Making 100% of a plane from raw material in home makes no sense in these times for even advanced countries (with a few exceptions of US, China, and Russia). It is still a Pakistani plane even if you source many sub-systems from abroad as long as you have the ability to mix and match these system with the end result of a working and reliable fighter plane. A plane that not only you use bit also win the confidence of other nations and export it to them
 
even if you source many sub-systems from abroad as long as you have the ability to mix and match these system with the end result of a working and reliable fighter plane.
The problem is... Pakistan cant, without oem assistance.

dont believe me, no problem, im willing to bet both @Oscar and @puttputt will tell you the same.

PAF is wholly dependant on China for anything to do with jf-17's, including modifications.
 
Ah, all this is in stark contrast with 'MKI is more Indian than Thunder being Pakistani' narrative.

To some gentlemen, making plastic and aluminum in Pakistan is a prerequisite to making Thunder a Pakistani plane even if these things are cheaply available from multiple sources.

Making 100% of a plane from raw material in home makes no sense in these times for even advanced countries (with a few exceptions of US, China, and Russia). It is still a Pakistani plane even if you source many sub-systems from abroad as long as you have the ability to mix and match these system with the end result of a working and reliable fighter plane. A plane that not only you use bit also win the confidence of other nations and export it to them
rofl... 'narratives' ... the favourite 5G hybrid battleground of the losers in our ranks (and sadly, leading our affairs).

The issue wasn't whether the JF-17 was made in Pakistan or not made in Pakistan.

The issue for some of us was that China didn't do anything special for us. Rather, the Chinese, to their credit of course, signed a contract and fulfilled it. That is it. This wasn't a favour for us, nor was it a favour to them. They honoured a deal, and, as in all commercial endeavours, we thank them for their business and they thank us. Maybe the standards for us have fallen so low that to see a deal honoured is a big deal, sure, but outside of that, the Chinese did their usual thing (be reliable business partners).

We got into the mess of discussing Pakistan's input in the JF-17 because some seem to think the Chinese went out of their way for us and we should be eternally grateful to them for it and if not for them we'd be lost. They didn't. In reality, we are still reliant on them for the JF-17 and they benefit from that relationship. It's not an inherently bad thing, but instead of having a weak mentality about it, maybe we should wise up to the fact that we have perhaps some leverage with a few of their vendors.
 
***********sigh***********

Okay, how about you and I make a plan and talk to one of the CPDs of the JF-17 program.
Sure. Love to. Security guys might make a fucking hue and cry though.
I'm serious.

We can talk to the folks who set up the MRO for RD-93, who've managed Block-2, who've set up the design for Block-3, etc. You name it, they're all retired now, and you can ask them to verify each and every point you have up there.
And I know several of them personally and a fair few professionally. And most of them speak in generalities. You will never get more than a basic overview of capabilities and talks about challenges will be in the broadest way. Not aerospace related, but defence related, until 2022, no one knew we had a parallel laser enrichment program. People knew work was being done on lasers but this was never suspected.
 
India can make all the noise it wants. If the US didn’t want Pakistan to use F16s against India, they wouldn’t have given Pakistan 500 AMRAAMs. There is no restriction on PAFs use of F16s against India during a conflict.
This is absurd that some think that 500 BVR was only for defence? How can USA ensure the BVR we are giving when time come we will stop them from using in offence? There is no restrictions on AMRAAMS even on offence
 
Sweden: won’t sell any “offensive” system. Everything available for indian.

Korea: won’t sell us anything anymore in effort to gain indian orders.

France: same. Plus blocked Subs/ mirages under upgrade during escalations.

US: on and off sanctions.

The truth is somewhere in between. None of them would provide emergency supplies of systems like we got post 2019.

Italy and Spain have been reliable though. Specially, Italy.
If you carefully look at Pak's interaction in last seven decades with major European countries in terms of tech transfer to Pakistan, you cannot miss a declining trend in that cooperation with the passage of time. That is not just a coincidence.

There has been a sustained Indian campaign for making every possible effort to block any meaningful military aid/business/cooperation with Pakistan by other countries targeting especially those ones traditionally known to have military links or business with Pakistan. Indians used every possible leverage, including blackmail, economic clout, offering bigger purchases, playing victim of Pak terrorism, etc. to somehow snap those links.

What people don't understand is the reality no one cares for a weaker country unless geostrategic calculations dictate for the opposite. China-Pakistan relation should be seen in that context.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top