JF-17 - Updates, News & Discussion

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

We can all thank this clown. US senator Larry Pressler.

Can we please end him a Thankyou email [email protected]

If it was not for his Legislative bill for sanctions against Pakistan , we wont have JF-17 today.

image_2026-01-09_224615978.png
 
Last edited:
Why does it say 3,400 kg? I thought blk 2 should be blk 3, with an external carrying capacity of 4,700 kg. Where did I go wrong?
 
Sudan, Libya, KSA, Bangladesh I mean if even 1 deal goes through, its a win for us... I don't understand how Sudan will fly the JF-17's? or unless Sudan/KSA order is same, and these 1-2 sqs are stationed in Sudan but flown by PAF pilots in some KSA operating base. But I guess only time will tell, but I will be happy if just one of these 4 listed countries buy JF-17.
 
Yeah! And when we do see it flying with them, what's to say that it can launch them? If it can launch them, do they even explode? I won't believe it until I see an unedited video starting from launch till impact. Someone reach out to the ACM pronto, we need to be convinced.

The PAF is not your childhood group of friends.
No I asked a simple question but the fact that you cannot answer it says a lot
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TF8
Ok fine...JF-17 cant carry 4x PL-15.... In fact JF-17 cannot even fly.
Actually..... the aircraft is fake and doesnt exist.
Khush?
i saw a video on 5th may or something JF17 was carrying 2 PL-15. However, I think the radar could be under powered even with AESA radar. That is why we used J10C.
P.S. I think this question must have been answered but the Search Engie sucks at pdf. So, we need some pinned posts like Oscar suggested (top of each page until it runs out)? @Mr X
 
I still can’t believe that so many customers are buying the JF-17 !

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


This is a bit emotional for us because for a long time no one believed in the JF-17. It was mocked, junk, lousy, and limited ...... until May 7, 2025.

Keep faith, dudes

giphy.gif
 
can anybody find JF17 video with PL15 in May?
 
Why does it say 3,400 kg? I thought blk 2 should be blk 3, with an external carrying capacity of 4,700 kg. Where did I go wrong?
same engine for both versions of JF-17 hence same PAYLOAD CAPACITY for both versions of JF-17
 
can anybody find JF17 video with PL15 in May?
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
What he is smoking will probably kill a horse. So no, you do NOT need what he is smoking. :D
Given the crap you keep posting based on butthurt Indian and exiled Burmese sources without a shred of evidence, I thought you were smoking the same stuff. If it would probably kill a horse, I sincerely hope u are.
 
That could certainly be an adequate explanation of the reported issues. After all, an aircraft is only one part in a complex system that utilizes it properly.
‘Reported issues’ - from already debunked sources🤡
 
I thought you were smoking the same stuff. If it would probably kill a horse, I sincerely hope u are.

Please send your wish for my death directly to Malk-ul-Maut for due consideration. Thanks! :D

In the meantime, if you wish to pretend that the JF-17s are perfect, please go right ahead. They will still perform only as well as they can, and no more.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top